Cargando…

Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification

BACKGROUND: The ability to cryopreserve mammalian embryos has become an integral part of assisted reproduction, both in human and veterinary medicine. Despite differences in the size and physiological characteristics of embryos from various species, the embryos have been frozen by either of two proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somoskoi, Bence, Martino, Nicola A, Cardone, Rosa A, Lacalandra, Giovanni M, Dell’Aquila, Maria E, Cseh, Sandor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0018-z
_version_ 1782369603432742912
author Somoskoi, Bence
Martino, Nicola A
Cardone, Rosa A
Lacalandra, Giovanni M
Dell’Aquila, Maria E
Cseh, Sandor
author_facet Somoskoi, Bence
Martino, Nicola A
Cardone, Rosa A
Lacalandra, Giovanni M
Dell’Aquila, Maria E
Cseh, Sandor
author_sort Somoskoi, Bence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ability to cryopreserve mammalian embryos has become an integral part of assisted reproduction, both in human and veterinary medicine. Despite differences in the size and physiological characteristics of embryos from various species, the embryos have been frozen by either of two procedures: slow freezing or vitrification. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of slow freezing and vitrification to the chromatin structure, energy status and reactive oxygen species production of mouse morulae and blastocysts. METHODS: Mouse morulae and blastocysts were randomly allocated into vitrification, slow freezing and control groups. For slow freezing, Dulbecco phosphate buffered saline based 10% glicerol solution was used. For vitrification, G-MOPS™ based solution supplemented with 16% ethylene glycol, 16% propylene glycol, Ficoll (10 mg/ml) and sucrose (0.65 mol/l) was used. After warming, the chromatin integrity, mitochondrial distribution pattern and energy/oxidative status were compared among groups. RESULTS: Cryopreservation affected chromatin integrity at a greater extent at the morula than the blastocyst stage. Chromatin damage induced by slow freezing was more relevant compared to vitrification. Slow freezing and vitrification similarly affected mitochondrial distribution pattern. Greater damage was observed at the morula stage and it was associated with embryo grade. Cryopreservation altered the quantitative bioenergy/redox parameters at a greater extent in the morulae than in the blastocysts. Effects induced by slow freezing were not related to embryo grade or mitochondrial pattern, as affected embryos were of all grades and with both mitochondrial patterns. However, effects induced by vitrification were related to mitochondrial pattern, as only embryos with homogeneous mitochondrial pattern in small aggregates had reduced energy status. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time the joint assessment of chromatin damage and mitochondrial energy/redox potential in fresh and frozen mouse embryos at the morula and blastocyst stage, allowing the comparison of the effects of the two most commonly used cryopreservation procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4419566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44195662015-05-06 Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification Somoskoi, Bence Martino, Nicola A Cardone, Rosa A Lacalandra, Giovanni M Dell’Aquila, Maria E Cseh, Sandor Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: The ability to cryopreserve mammalian embryos has become an integral part of assisted reproduction, both in human and veterinary medicine. Despite differences in the size and physiological characteristics of embryos from various species, the embryos have been frozen by either of two procedures: slow freezing or vitrification. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of slow freezing and vitrification to the chromatin structure, energy status and reactive oxygen species production of mouse morulae and blastocysts. METHODS: Mouse morulae and blastocysts were randomly allocated into vitrification, slow freezing and control groups. For slow freezing, Dulbecco phosphate buffered saline based 10% glicerol solution was used. For vitrification, G-MOPS™ based solution supplemented with 16% ethylene glycol, 16% propylene glycol, Ficoll (10 mg/ml) and sucrose (0.65 mol/l) was used. After warming, the chromatin integrity, mitochondrial distribution pattern and energy/oxidative status were compared among groups. RESULTS: Cryopreservation affected chromatin integrity at a greater extent at the morula than the blastocyst stage. Chromatin damage induced by slow freezing was more relevant compared to vitrification. Slow freezing and vitrification similarly affected mitochondrial distribution pattern. Greater damage was observed at the morula stage and it was associated with embryo grade. Cryopreservation altered the quantitative bioenergy/redox parameters at a greater extent in the morulae than in the blastocysts. Effects induced by slow freezing were not related to embryo grade or mitochondrial pattern, as affected embryos were of all grades and with both mitochondrial patterns. However, effects induced by vitrification were related to mitochondrial pattern, as only embryos with homogeneous mitochondrial pattern in small aggregates had reduced energy status. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time the joint assessment of chromatin damage and mitochondrial energy/redox potential in fresh and frozen mouse embryos at the morula and blastocyst stage, allowing the comparison of the effects of the two most commonly used cryopreservation procedures. BioMed Central 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4419566/ /pubmed/25889099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0018-z Text en © Somoskoi et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Somoskoi, Bence
Martino, Nicola A
Cardone, Rosa A
Lacalandra, Giovanni M
Dell’Aquila, Maria E
Cseh, Sandor
Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification
title Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification
title_full Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification
title_fullStr Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification
title_full_unstemmed Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification
title_short Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification
title_sort different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4419566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0018-z
work_keys_str_mv AT somoskoibence differentchromatinandenergyredoxresponsesofmousemorulaeandblastocyststoslowfreezingandvitrification
AT martinonicolaa differentchromatinandenergyredoxresponsesofmousemorulaeandblastocyststoslowfreezingandvitrification
AT cardonerosaa differentchromatinandenergyredoxresponsesofmousemorulaeandblastocyststoslowfreezingandvitrification
AT lacalandragiovannim differentchromatinandenergyredoxresponsesofmousemorulaeandblastocyststoslowfreezingandvitrification
AT dellaquilamariae differentchromatinandenergyredoxresponsesofmousemorulaeandblastocyststoslowfreezingandvitrification
AT csehsandor differentchromatinandenergyredoxresponsesofmousemorulaeandblastocyststoslowfreezingandvitrification