Cargando…

Renoprotective effects of atorvastatin compared with pravastatin on progression of early diabetic nephropathy

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that statins suppress the progression of diabetic nephropathy. However, few reports have directly compared the renoprotective effects between potent and conventional statins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with diabetic nephropathy, selected as those with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takazakura, Akiko, Sakurai, Masaru, Bando, Yukihiro, Misu, Hirofumi, Takeshita, Yumie, Kita, Yuki, Shimizu, Akiko, Hayakawa, Tetsuo, Kato, Ken-ichiro, Kaneko, Shuichi, Takamura, Toshinari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25969721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12296
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that statins suppress the progression of diabetic nephropathy. However, few reports have directly compared the renoprotective effects between potent and conventional statins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with diabetic nephropathy, selected as those with a serum creatinine level of 0.9–1.5 mg/dL and simultaneously having either microalbuminuria or positive proteinuria, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a conventional diet therapy group, a group given 10 mg of pravastatin and a group given 10 mg of atorvastatin. Renal function was evaluated before and after a 12-month period of therapy. RESULTS: The atorvastatin group had a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 3 months and thereafter compared with the other groups. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio significantly decreased in the atorvastatin group; the degree of this decrease was significantly greater than that in the diet therapy group. The kidney function estimated with cystatin C (CysC) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated from CysC were significantly preserved in the atorvastatin group compared with the pravastatin group. In a multivariate regression analysis, the use of atorvastatin was the only explanatory variable for the changes in CysC; this was independent of changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin is more effective than pravastatin for the prevention of increase in CysC, and this renoprotective effect was considered to a result of the pleiotropic effect of atorvastatin independent of its lipid-lowering effect. This study was registered with UMIN (no. UMIN 000001774).