Cargando…

Differentiation of malignant tumours from granulomas by using dynamic [(18)F]-fluoro-L-α-methyltyrosine positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies have revealed the potential of [(18)F]-fluoro-L-α-methyltyrosine ((18)F-FAMT) for the differential diagnosis of malignant tumours from sarcoidosis. However, one concern regarding the differential diagnosis with (18)F-FAMT is the possibility of false negatives gi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamaguchi, Aiko, Hanaoka, Hirofumi, Fujisawa, Yutaka, Zhao, Songji, Suzue, Kazutomo, Morita, Akihiro, Tominaga, Hideyuki, Higuchi, Tetsuya, Hisaeda, Hajime, Tsushima, Yoshito, Kuge, Yuji, Iida, Yasuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0109-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies have revealed the potential of [(18)F]-fluoro-L-α-methyltyrosine ((18)F-FAMT) for the differential diagnosis of malignant tumours from sarcoidosis. However, one concern regarding the differential diagnosis with (18)F-FAMT is the possibility of false negatives given the small absolute uptake of (18)F-FAMT that has been observed in some malignant tumours. The aim of this study was to evaluate a usefulness of dynamic (18)F-FAMT positron emission tomography (PET) for differentiating malignant tumours from granulomas. METHODS: Rats bearing both granulomas (Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-induced) and tumours (C6 glioma cell-induced) underwent dynamic 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) PET and (18)F-FAMT PET for 120 min on consecutive days. Time-activity curves, static images, mean standardized uptake values (SUVs) and the SUV ratios (SUVRs; calculated by dividing SUV at each time point by that of 2 min after injection) were assessed. RESULTS: In tumours, (18)F-FAMT showed a shoulder peak immediately after the initial distribution followed by gradual clearance compared with granulomas. Although the mean SUV in the tumours (1.00 ± 0.10) was significantly higher than that in the granulomas (0.88 ± 0.12), a large overlap was observed. In contrast, the SUVR was markedly higher in tumours than in granulomas (50 min/2 min, 0.72 ± 0.06 and 0.56 ± 0.05, respectively) with no overlap. The dynamic patterns, SUVR, and mean SUV of (18)F-FDG in the granulomas were comparable to those in the tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic (18)F-FAMT and SUVR analysis might compensate for the current limitations and help in improving the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FAMT.