Cargando…

Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing active from inactive compounds is one of the crucial problems of molecular docking, especially in the context of virtual screening experiments. The randomization of poses and the natural flexibility of the protein make this discrimination even harder. Some of the recent ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mordalski, Stefan, Witek, Jagna, Smusz, Sabina, Rataj, Krzysztof, Bojarski, Andrzej J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0062-x
_version_ 1782369766309101568
author Mordalski, Stefan
Witek, Jagna
Smusz, Sabina
Rataj, Krzysztof
Bojarski, Andrzej J
author_facet Mordalski, Stefan
Witek, Jagna
Smusz, Sabina
Rataj, Krzysztof
Bojarski, Andrzej J
author_sort Mordalski, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distinguishing active from inactive compounds is one of the crucial problems of molecular docking, especially in the context of virtual screening experiments. The randomization of poses and the natural flexibility of the protein make this discrimination even harder. Some of the recent approaches to post-docking analysis use an ensemble of receptor models to mimic this naturally occurring conformational diversity. However, the optimal number of receptor conformations is yet to be determined. In this study, we compare the results of a retrospective screening of beta-2 adrenergic receptor ligands performed on both the ensemble of receptor conformations extracted from ten available crystal structures and an equal number of homology models. Additional analysis was also performed for homology models with up to 20 receptor conformations considered. RESULTS: The docking results were encoded into the Structural Interaction Fingerprints and were automatically analyzed by support vector machine. The use of homology models in such virtual screening application was proved to be superior in comparison to crystal structures. Additionally, increasing the number of receptor conformational states led to enhanced effectiveness of active vs. inactive compounds discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: For virtual screening purposes, the use of homology models was found to be most beneficial, even in the presence of crystallographic data regarding the conformational space of the receptor. The results also showed that increasing the number of receptors considered improves the effectiveness of identifying active compounds by machine learning methods. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13321-015-0062-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4420846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44208462015-05-07 Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study Mordalski, Stefan Witek, Jagna Smusz, Sabina Rataj, Krzysztof Bojarski, Andrzej J J Cheminform Research Article BACKGROUND: Distinguishing active from inactive compounds is one of the crucial problems of molecular docking, especially in the context of virtual screening experiments. The randomization of poses and the natural flexibility of the protein make this discrimination even harder. Some of the recent approaches to post-docking analysis use an ensemble of receptor models to mimic this naturally occurring conformational diversity. However, the optimal number of receptor conformations is yet to be determined. In this study, we compare the results of a retrospective screening of beta-2 adrenergic receptor ligands performed on both the ensemble of receptor conformations extracted from ten available crystal structures and an equal number of homology models. Additional analysis was also performed for homology models with up to 20 receptor conformations considered. RESULTS: The docking results were encoded into the Structural Interaction Fingerprints and were automatically analyzed by support vector machine. The use of homology models in such virtual screening application was proved to be superior in comparison to crystal structures. Additionally, increasing the number of receptor conformational states led to enhanced effectiveness of active vs. inactive compounds discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: For virtual screening purposes, the use of homology models was found to be most beneficial, even in the presence of crystallographic data regarding the conformational space of the receptor. The results also showed that increasing the number of receptors considered improves the effectiveness of identifying active compounds by machine learning methods. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13321-015-0062-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4420846/ /pubmed/25949744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0062-x Text en © Mordalski et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mordalski, Stefan
Witek, Jagna
Smusz, Sabina
Rataj, Krzysztof
Bojarski, Andrzej J
Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study
title Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study
title_full Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study
title_fullStr Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study
title_full_unstemmed Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study
title_short Multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study
title_sort multiple conformational states in retrospective virtual screening – homology models vs. crystal structures: beta-2 adrenergic receptor case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0062-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mordalskistefan multipleconformationalstatesinretrospectivevirtualscreeninghomologymodelsvscrystalstructuresbeta2adrenergicreceptorcasestudy
AT witekjagna multipleconformationalstatesinretrospectivevirtualscreeninghomologymodelsvscrystalstructuresbeta2adrenergicreceptorcasestudy
AT smuszsabina multipleconformationalstatesinretrospectivevirtualscreeninghomologymodelsvscrystalstructuresbeta2adrenergicreceptorcasestudy
AT ratajkrzysztof multipleconformationalstatesinretrospectivevirtualscreeninghomologymodelsvscrystalstructuresbeta2adrenergicreceptorcasestudy
AT bojarskiandrzejj multipleconformationalstatesinretrospectivevirtualscreeninghomologymodelsvscrystalstructuresbeta2adrenergicreceptorcasestudy