Cargando…

3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability

OBJECTIVES: To assess the communication potential of three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific models of congenital heart defects and their acceptability in clinical practice for cardiology consultations. DESIGN: This was a questionnaire-based study in which participants were randomised into two group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biglino, Giovanni, Capelli, Claudio, Wray, Jo, Schievano, Silvia, Leaver, Lindsay-Kay, Khambadkone, Sachin, Giardini, Alessandro, Derrick, Graham, Jones, Alexander, Taylor, Andrew M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25933810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007165
_version_ 1782369777775280128
author Biglino, Giovanni
Capelli, Claudio
Wray, Jo
Schievano, Silvia
Leaver, Lindsay-Kay
Khambadkone, Sachin
Giardini, Alessandro
Derrick, Graham
Jones, Alexander
Taylor, Andrew M
author_facet Biglino, Giovanni
Capelli, Claudio
Wray, Jo
Schievano, Silvia
Leaver, Lindsay-Kay
Khambadkone, Sachin
Giardini, Alessandro
Derrick, Graham
Jones, Alexander
Taylor, Andrew M
author_sort Biglino, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the communication potential of three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific models of congenital heart defects and their acceptability in clinical practice for cardiology consultations. DESIGN: This was a questionnaire-based study in which participants were randomised into two groups: the ‘model group’ received a 3D model of the cardiac lesion(s) being discussed during their appointment, while the ‘control group’ had a routine visit. SETTING: Outpatient clinic, cardiology follow-up visits. PARTICIPANTS: 103 parents of children with congenital heart disease were recruited (parental age: 43±8 years; patient age: 12±6 years). In order to have a 3D model made, patients needed to have a recent cardiac MRI examination; this was the crucial inclusion criterion. INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaires were administered to the participants before and after the visits and an additional questionnaire was administered to the attending cardiologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rating (1–10) for the liking of the 3D model, its usefulness and the clarity of the explanation received were recorded, as well as rating (1–10) of the parental understanding and their engagement according to the cardiologist. Furthermore, parental knowledge was assessed by asking them to mark diagrams, tick keywords and provide free text answers. The duration of consultations was recorded and parent feedback collected. RESULTS: Parents and cardiologists both found the models to be very useful and helpful in engaging the parents in discussing congenital heart defects. Parental knowledge was not associated with their level of education (p=0.2) and did not improve following their visit. Consultations involving 3D models lasted on average 5 min longer (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific models can enhance engagement with parents and improve communication between cardiologists and parents, potentially impacting on parent and patient psychological adjustment following treatment. However, in the short-term, parental understanding of their child's condition did not improve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4420970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44209702015-05-13 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability Biglino, Giovanni Capelli, Claudio Wray, Jo Schievano, Silvia Leaver, Lindsay-Kay Khambadkone, Sachin Giardini, Alessandro Derrick, Graham Jones, Alexander Taylor, Andrew M BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVES: To assess the communication potential of three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific models of congenital heart defects and their acceptability in clinical practice for cardiology consultations. DESIGN: This was a questionnaire-based study in which participants were randomised into two groups: the ‘model group’ received a 3D model of the cardiac lesion(s) being discussed during their appointment, while the ‘control group’ had a routine visit. SETTING: Outpatient clinic, cardiology follow-up visits. PARTICIPANTS: 103 parents of children with congenital heart disease were recruited (parental age: 43±8 years; patient age: 12±6 years). In order to have a 3D model made, patients needed to have a recent cardiac MRI examination; this was the crucial inclusion criterion. INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaires were administered to the participants before and after the visits and an additional questionnaire was administered to the attending cardiologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rating (1–10) for the liking of the 3D model, its usefulness and the clarity of the explanation received were recorded, as well as rating (1–10) of the parental understanding and their engagement according to the cardiologist. Furthermore, parental knowledge was assessed by asking them to mark diagrams, tick keywords and provide free text answers. The duration of consultations was recorded and parent feedback collected. RESULTS: Parents and cardiologists both found the models to be very useful and helpful in engaging the parents in discussing congenital heart defects. Parental knowledge was not associated with their level of education (p=0.2) and did not improve following their visit. Consultations involving 3D models lasted on average 5 min longer (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific models can enhance engagement with parents and improve communication between cardiologists and parents, potentially impacting on parent and patient psychological adjustment following treatment. However, in the short-term, parental understanding of their child's condition did not improve. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4420970/ /pubmed/25933810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007165 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Communication
Biglino, Giovanni
Capelli, Claudio
Wray, Jo
Schievano, Silvia
Leaver, Lindsay-Kay
Khambadkone, Sachin
Giardini, Alessandro
Derrick, Graham
Jones, Alexander
Taylor, Andrew M
3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability
title 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability
title_full 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability
title_fullStr 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability
title_full_unstemmed 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability
title_short 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability
title_sort 3d-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25933810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007165
work_keys_str_mv AT biglinogiovanni 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT capelliclaudio 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT wrayjo 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT schievanosilvia 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT leaverlindsaykay 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT khambadkonesachin 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT giardinialessandro 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT derrickgraham 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT jonesalexander 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability
AT taylorandrewm 3dmanufacturedpatientspecificmodelsofcongenitalheartdefectsforcommunicationinclinicalpracticefeasibilityandacceptability