Cargando…

A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks. SETTING: 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. PARTIC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacIntyre, C Raina, Seale, Holly, Dung, Tham Chi, Hien, Nguyen Tran, Nga, Phan Thi, Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad, Rahman, Bayzidur, Dwyer, Dominic E, Wang, Quanyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577
_version_ 1782369778031132672
author MacIntyre, C Raina
Seale, Holly
Dung, Tham Chi
Hien, Nguyen Tran
Nga, Phan Thi
Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
Rahman, Bayzidur
Dwyer, Dominic E
Wang, Quanyi
author_facet MacIntyre, C Raina
Seale, Holly
Dung, Tham Chi
Hien, Nguyen Tran
Nga, Phan Thi
Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
Rahman, Bayzidur
Dwyer, Dominic E
Wang, Quanyi
author_sort MacIntyre, C Raina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks. SETTING: 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. PARTICIPANTS: 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in selected high-risk wards. INTERVENTION: Hospital wards were randomised to: medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which included mask wearing). Participants used the mask on every shift for 4 consecutive weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection. RESULTS: The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12610000887077.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4420971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44209712015-05-13 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers MacIntyre, C Raina Seale, Holly Dung, Tham Chi Hien, Nguyen Tran Nga, Phan Thi Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad Rahman, Bayzidur Dwyer, Dominic E Wang, Quanyi BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks. SETTING: 14 secondary-level/tertiary-level hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. PARTICIPANTS: 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in selected high-risk wards. INTERVENTION: Hospital wards were randomised to: medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which included mask wearing). Participants used the mask on every shift for 4 consecutive weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection. RESULTS: The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12610000887077. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4420971/ /pubmed/25903751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
MacIntyre, C Raina
Seale, Holly
Dung, Tham Chi
Hien, Nguyen Tran
Nga, Phan Thi
Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
Rahman, Bayzidur
Dwyer, Dominic E
Wang, Quanyi
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
title A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
title_full A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
title_fullStr A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
title_full_unstemmed A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
title_short A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
title_sort cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577
work_keys_str_mv AT macintyrecraina aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT sealeholly aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT dungthamchi aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT hiennguyentran aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT ngaphanthi aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT chughtaiabrarahmad aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT rahmanbayzidur aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT dwyerdominice aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT wangquanyi aclusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT macintyrecraina clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT sealeholly clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT dungthamchi clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT hiennguyentran clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT ngaphanthi clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT chughtaiabrarahmad clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT rahmanbayzidur clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT dwyerdominice clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers
AT wangquanyi clusterrandomisedtrialofclothmaskscomparedwithmedicalmasksinhealthcareworkers