Cargando…
A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
Background. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as epoetin alfa and beta, and darbepoetin alfa have improved the management of anaemia secondary to chronic kidney disease. Numerous studies have reported a dose reduction when patients receiving dialysis were converted from epoetin to darbep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4421401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfp097 |
_version_ | 1782369860783702016 |
---|---|
author | Bonafont, Xavier Bock, Andreas Carter, Dave Brunkhorst, Reinhard Carrera, Fernando Iskedjian, Michael Molemans, Bart Dehmel, Bastian Robbins, Sean |
author_facet | Bonafont, Xavier Bock, Andreas Carter, Dave Brunkhorst, Reinhard Carrera, Fernando Iskedjian, Michael Molemans, Bart Dehmel, Bastian Robbins, Sean |
author_sort | Bonafont, Xavier |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as epoetin alfa and beta, and darbepoetin alfa have improved the management of anaemia secondary to chronic kidney disease. Numerous studies have reported a dose reduction when patients receiving dialysis were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa using the starting dose conversion of 200:1 as indicated on the prescribing label by the European Medicines Agency. The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the existing body of scientific evidence to evaluate the potential dose savings when comparing epoetin alfa or beta to darbepoetin alfa. Method. Medline and EmBase were searched to identify all published trials investigating ESA treatment in anaemic patients receiving dialysis and converted from epoetins to darbepoetin alfa. We selected prospective randomized controlled, non-randomized and observational studies involving patients on dialysis that compared epoetin and darbepoetin alfa dosing. Results. Of 573 articles identified, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. The overall percentage dose savings attained when dialysis patients were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa was 30% (range: 4%–44%). Greater dose savings were noted with intravenous administration (33%) compared with subcutaneous (27%) and between switch-over studies (31%) and RCTs (27%). In all studies, target haemoglobin levels were maintained before and after conversion. Conclusion. This meta-analysis demonstrates that when using an initial 200:1 conversion ratio, as indicated on the European label, from epoetin to darbepoetin, a subsequent reduction in dose was observed and an average 30% dose savings could be achieved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4421401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44214012015-05-06 A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis Bonafont, Xavier Bock, Andreas Carter, Dave Brunkhorst, Reinhard Carrera, Fernando Iskedjian, Michael Molemans, Bart Dehmel, Bastian Robbins, Sean NDT Plus In-Depth Clinical Review Background. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as epoetin alfa and beta, and darbepoetin alfa have improved the management of anaemia secondary to chronic kidney disease. Numerous studies have reported a dose reduction when patients receiving dialysis were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa using the starting dose conversion of 200:1 as indicated on the prescribing label by the European Medicines Agency. The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the existing body of scientific evidence to evaluate the potential dose savings when comparing epoetin alfa or beta to darbepoetin alfa. Method. Medline and EmBase were searched to identify all published trials investigating ESA treatment in anaemic patients receiving dialysis and converted from epoetins to darbepoetin alfa. We selected prospective randomized controlled, non-randomized and observational studies involving patients on dialysis that compared epoetin and darbepoetin alfa dosing. Results. Of 573 articles identified, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. The overall percentage dose savings attained when dialysis patients were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa was 30% (range: 4%–44%). Greater dose savings were noted with intravenous administration (33%) compared with subcutaneous (27%) and between switch-over studies (31%) and RCTs (27%). In all studies, target haemoglobin levels were maintained before and after conversion. Conclusion. This meta-analysis demonstrates that when using an initial 200:1 conversion ratio, as indicated on the European label, from epoetin to darbepoetin, a subsequent reduction in dose was observed and an average 30% dose savings could be achieved. Oxford University Press 2009-10 2009-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4421401/ /pubmed/25949339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfp097 Text en © The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | In-Depth Clinical Review Bonafont, Xavier Bock, Andreas Carter, Dave Brunkhorst, Reinhard Carrera, Fernando Iskedjian, Michael Molemans, Bart Dehmel, Bastian Robbins, Sean A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis |
title | A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis |
title_full | A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis |
title_short | A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis |
title_sort | meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis |
topic | In-Depth Clinical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4421401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfp097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonafontxavier ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT bockandreas ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT carterdave ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT brunkhorstreinhard ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT carrerafernando ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT iskedjianmichael ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT molemansbart ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT dehmelbastian ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT robbinssean ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT bonafontxavier metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT bockandreas metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT carterdave metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT brunkhorstreinhard metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT carrerafernando metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT iskedjianmichael metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT molemansbart metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT dehmelbastian metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis AT robbinssean metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis |