Cargando…

A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis

Background. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as epoetin alfa and beta, and darbepoetin alfa have improved the management of anaemia secondary to chronic kidney disease. Numerous studies have reported a dose reduction when patients receiving dialysis were converted from epoetin to darbep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonafont, Xavier, Bock, Andreas, Carter, Dave, Brunkhorst, Reinhard, Carrera, Fernando, Iskedjian, Michael, Molemans, Bart, Dehmel, Bastian, Robbins, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4421401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfp097
_version_ 1782369860783702016
author Bonafont, Xavier
Bock, Andreas
Carter, Dave
Brunkhorst, Reinhard
Carrera, Fernando
Iskedjian, Michael
Molemans, Bart
Dehmel, Bastian
Robbins, Sean
author_facet Bonafont, Xavier
Bock, Andreas
Carter, Dave
Brunkhorst, Reinhard
Carrera, Fernando
Iskedjian, Michael
Molemans, Bart
Dehmel, Bastian
Robbins, Sean
author_sort Bonafont, Xavier
collection PubMed
description Background. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as epoetin alfa and beta, and darbepoetin alfa have improved the management of anaemia secondary to chronic kidney disease. Numerous studies have reported a dose reduction when patients receiving dialysis were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa using the starting dose conversion of 200:1 as indicated on the prescribing label by the European Medicines Agency. The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the existing body of scientific evidence to evaluate the potential dose savings when comparing epoetin alfa or beta to darbepoetin alfa. Method. Medline and EmBase were searched to identify all published trials investigating ESA treatment in anaemic patients receiving dialysis and converted from epoetins to darbepoetin alfa. We selected prospective randomized controlled, non-randomized and observational studies involving patients on dialysis that compared epoetin and darbepoetin alfa dosing. Results. Of 573 articles identified, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. The overall percentage dose savings attained when dialysis patients were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa was 30% (range: 4%–44%). Greater dose savings were noted with intravenous administration (33%) compared with subcutaneous (27%) and between switch-over studies (31%) and RCTs (27%). In all studies, target haemoglobin levels were maintained before and after conversion. Conclusion. This meta-analysis demonstrates that when using an initial 200:1 conversion ratio, as indicated on the European label, from epoetin to darbepoetin, a subsequent reduction in dose was observed and an average 30% dose savings could be achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4421401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44214012015-05-06 A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis Bonafont, Xavier Bock, Andreas Carter, Dave Brunkhorst, Reinhard Carrera, Fernando Iskedjian, Michael Molemans, Bart Dehmel, Bastian Robbins, Sean NDT Plus In-Depth Clinical Review Background. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as epoetin alfa and beta, and darbepoetin alfa have improved the management of anaemia secondary to chronic kidney disease. Numerous studies have reported a dose reduction when patients receiving dialysis were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa using the starting dose conversion of 200:1 as indicated on the prescribing label by the European Medicines Agency. The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the existing body of scientific evidence to evaluate the potential dose savings when comparing epoetin alfa or beta to darbepoetin alfa. Method. Medline and EmBase were searched to identify all published trials investigating ESA treatment in anaemic patients receiving dialysis and converted from epoetins to darbepoetin alfa. We selected prospective randomized controlled, non-randomized and observational studies involving patients on dialysis that compared epoetin and darbepoetin alfa dosing. Results. Of 573 articles identified, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. The overall percentage dose savings attained when dialysis patients were converted from epoetin to darbepoetin alfa was 30% (range: 4%–44%). Greater dose savings were noted with intravenous administration (33%) compared with subcutaneous (27%) and between switch-over studies (31%) and RCTs (27%). In all studies, target haemoglobin levels were maintained before and after conversion. Conclusion. This meta-analysis demonstrates that when using an initial 200:1 conversion ratio, as indicated on the European label, from epoetin to darbepoetin, a subsequent reduction in dose was observed and an average 30% dose savings could be achieved. Oxford University Press 2009-10 2009-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4421401/ /pubmed/25949339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfp097 Text en © The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle In-Depth Clinical Review
Bonafont, Xavier
Bock, Andreas
Carter, Dave
Brunkhorst, Reinhard
Carrera, Fernando
Iskedjian, Michael
Molemans, Bart
Dehmel, Bastian
Robbins, Sean
A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
title A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
title_full A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
title_short A meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
title_sort meta-analysis of the relative doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis
topic In-Depth Clinical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4421401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfp097
work_keys_str_mv AT bonafontxavier ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT bockandreas ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT carterdave ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT brunkhorstreinhard ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT carrerafernando ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT iskedjianmichael ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT molemansbart ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT dehmelbastian ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT robbinssean ametaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT bonafontxavier metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT bockandreas metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT carterdave metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT brunkhorstreinhard metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT carrerafernando metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT iskedjianmichael metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT molemansbart metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT dehmelbastian metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis
AT robbinssean metaanalysisoftherelativedosesoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsinpatientsundergoingdialysis