Cargando…
Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events
BACKGROUND: When summary results from studies of counts of events in time contain zeros, the study-specific incidence rate ratio (IRR) and its standard error cannot be calculated because the log of zero is undefined. This poses problems for the widely used inverse-variance method that weights the st...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0031-0 |
_version_ | 1782370001231020032 |
---|---|
author | Spittal, Matthew J Pirkis, Jane Gurrin, Lyle C |
author_facet | Spittal, Matthew J Pirkis, Jane Gurrin, Lyle C |
author_sort | Spittal, Matthew J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When summary results from studies of counts of events in time contain zeros, the study-specific incidence rate ratio (IRR) and its standard error cannot be calculated because the log of zero is undefined. This poses problems for the widely used inverse-variance method that weights the study-specific IRRs to generate a pooled estimate. METHODS: We conducted a simulation study to compare the inverse-variance method of conducting a meta-analysis (with and without the continuity correction) with alternative methods based on either Poisson regression with fixed interventions effects or Poisson regression with random intervention effects. We manipulated the percentage of zeros in the intervention group (from no zeros to approximately 80 percent zeros), the levels of baseline variability and heterogeneity in the intervention effect, and the number of studies that comprise each meta-analysis. We applied these methods to an example from our own work in suicide prevention and to a recent meta-analysis of the effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. RESULTS: As the percentage of zeros in the data increased, the inverse-variance method of pooling data shows increased bias and reduced coverage. Estimates from Poisson regression with fixed interventions effects also display evidence of bias and poor coverage, due to their inability to account for heterogeneity. Pooled IRRs from Poisson regression with random intervention effects were unaffected by the percentage of zeros in the data or the amount of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Inverse-variance methods perform poorly when the data contains zeros in either the control or intervention arms. Methods based on Poisson regression with random effect terms for the variance components are very flexible offer substantial improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0031-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4422043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44220432015-05-07 Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events Spittal, Matthew J Pirkis, Jane Gurrin, Lyle C BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: When summary results from studies of counts of events in time contain zeros, the study-specific incidence rate ratio (IRR) and its standard error cannot be calculated because the log of zero is undefined. This poses problems for the widely used inverse-variance method that weights the study-specific IRRs to generate a pooled estimate. METHODS: We conducted a simulation study to compare the inverse-variance method of conducting a meta-analysis (with and without the continuity correction) with alternative methods based on either Poisson regression with fixed interventions effects or Poisson regression with random intervention effects. We manipulated the percentage of zeros in the intervention group (from no zeros to approximately 80 percent zeros), the levels of baseline variability and heterogeneity in the intervention effect, and the number of studies that comprise each meta-analysis. We applied these methods to an example from our own work in suicide prevention and to a recent meta-analysis of the effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. RESULTS: As the percentage of zeros in the data increased, the inverse-variance method of pooling data shows increased bias and reduced coverage. Estimates from Poisson regression with fixed interventions effects also display evidence of bias and poor coverage, due to their inability to account for heterogeneity. Pooled IRRs from Poisson regression with random intervention effects were unaffected by the percentage of zeros in the data or the amount of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Inverse-variance methods perform poorly when the data contains zeros in either the control or intervention arms. Methods based on Poisson regression with random effect terms for the variance components are very flexible offer substantial improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0031-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4422043/ /pubmed/25925169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0031-0 Text en © Spittal et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Spittal, Matthew J Pirkis, Jane Gurrin, Lyle C Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events |
title | Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events |
title_full | Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events |
title_fullStr | Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events |
title_short | Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events |
title_sort | meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0031-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spittalmatthewj metaanalysisofincidenceratedatainthepresenceofzeroevents AT pirkisjane metaanalysisofincidenceratedatainthepresenceofzeroevents AT gurrinlylec metaanalysisofincidenceratedatainthepresenceofzeroevents |