Cargando…

Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk

As with most kinds of inner experience, it is difficult to assess actual self-talk frequency beyond self-reports, given the often hidden and subjective nature of the phenomenon. The Self-Talk Scale (STS; Brinthaupt et al., 2009) is a self-report measure of self-talk frequency that has been shown to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinthaupt, Thomas M., Benson, Scott A., Kang, Minsoo, Moore, Zaver D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999887
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570
_version_ 1782370004371505152
author Brinthaupt, Thomas M.
Benson, Scott A.
Kang, Minsoo
Moore, Zaver D.
author_facet Brinthaupt, Thomas M.
Benson, Scott A.
Kang, Minsoo
Moore, Zaver D.
author_sort Brinthaupt, Thomas M.
collection PubMed
description As with most kinds of inner experience, it is difficult to assess actual self-talk frequency beyond self-reports, given the often hidden and subjective nature of the phenomenon. The Self-Talk Scale (STS; Brinthaupt et al., 2009) is a self-report measure of self-talk frequency that has been shown to possess acceptable reliability and validity. However, no research using the STS has examined the accuracy of respondents’ self-reports. In the present paper, we report a series of studies directly examining the measurement of self-talk frequency and functions using the STS. The studies examine ways to validate self-reported self-talk by (1) comparing STS responses from 6 weeks earlier to recent experiences that might precipitate self-talk, (2) using experience sampling methods to determine whether STS scores are related to recent reports of self-talk over a period of a week, and (3) comparing self-reported STS scores to those provided by a significant other who rated the target on the STS. Results showed that (1) overall self-talk scores, particularly self-critical and self-reinforcing self-talk, were significantly related to reports of context-specific self-talk; (2) high STS scorers reported talking to themselves significantly more often during recent events compared to low STS scorers, and, contrary to expectations, (3) friends reported less agreement than strangers in their self-other self-talk ratings. Implications of the results for the validity of the STS and for measuring self-talk are presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4422081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44220812015-05-21 Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk Brinthaupt, Thomas M. Benson, Scott A. Kang, Minsoo Moore, Zaver D. Front Psychol Psychology As with most kinds of inner experience, it is difficult to assess actual self-talk frequency beyond self-reports, given the often hidden and subjective nature of the phenomenon. The Self-Talk Scale (STS; Brinthaupt et al., 2009) is a self-report measure of self-talk frequency that has been shown to possess acceptable reliability and validity. However, no research using the STS has examined the accuracy of respondents’ self-reports. In the present paper, we report a series of studies directly examining the measurement of self-talk frequency and functions using the STS. The studies examine ways to validate self-reported self-talk by (1) comparing STS responses from 6 weeks earlier to recent experiences that might precipitate self-talk, (2) using experience sampling methods to determine whether STS scores are related to recent reports of self-talk over a period of a week, and (3) comparing self-reported STS scores to those provided by a significant other who rated the target on the STS. Results showed that (1) overall self-talk scores, particularly self-critical and self-reinforcing self-talk, were significantly related to reports of context-specific self-talk; (2) high STS scorers reported talking to themselves significantly more often during recent events compared to low STS scorers, and, contrary to expectations, (3) friends reported less agreement than strangers in their self-other self-talk ratings. Implications of the results for the validity of the STS and for measuring self-talk are presented. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4422081/ /pubmed/25999887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570 Text en Copyright © 2015 Brinthaupt, Benson, Kang and Moore. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Brinthaupt, Thomas M.
Benson, Scott A.
Kang, Minsoo
Moore, Zaver D.
Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
title Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
title_full Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
title_fullStr Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
title_short Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
title_sort assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999887
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570
work_keys_str_mv AT brinthauptthomasm assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk
AT bensonscotta assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk
AT kangminsoo assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk
AT moorezaverd assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk