Cargando…
Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk
As with most kinds of inner experience, it is difficult to assess actual self-talk frequency beyond self-reports, given the often hidden and subjective nature of the phenomenon. The Self-Talk Scale (STS; Brinthaupt et al., 2009) is a self-report measure of self-talk frequency that has been shown to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570 |
_version_ | 1782370004371505152 |
---|---|
author | Brinthaupt, Thomas M. Benson, Scott A. Kang, Minsoo Moore, Zaver D. |
author_facet | Brinthaupt, Thomas M. Benson, Scott A. Kang, Minsoo Moore, Zaver D. |
author_sort | Brinthaupt, Thomas M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | As with most kinds of inner experience, it is difficult to assess actual self-talk frequency beyond self-reports, given the often hidden and subjective nature of the phenomenon. The Self-Talk Scale (STS; Brinthaupt et al., 2009) is a self-report measure of self-talk frequency that has been shown to possess acceptable reliability and validity. However, no research using the STS has examined the accuracy of respondents’ self-reports. In the present paper, we report a series of studies directly examining the measurement of self-talk frequency and functions using the STS. The studies examine ways to validate self-reported self-talk by (1) comparing STS responses from 6 weeks earlier to recent experiences that might precipitate self-talk, (2) using experience sampling methods to determine whether STS scores are related to recent reports of self-talk over a period of a week, and (3) comparing self-reported STS scores to those provided by a significant other who rated the target on the STS. Results showed that (1) overall self-talk scores, particularly self-critical and self-reinforcing self-talk, were significantly related to reports of context-specific self-talk; (2) high STS scorers reported talking to themselves significantly more often during recent events compared to low STS scorers, and, contrary to expectations, (3) friends reported less agreement than strangers in their self-other self-talk ratings. Implications of the results for the validity of the STS and for measuring self-talk are presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4422081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44220812015-05-21 Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk Brinthaupt, Thomas M. Benson, Scott A. Kang, Minsoo Moore, Zaver D. Front Psychol Psychology As with most kinds of inner experience, it is difficult to assess actual self-talk frequency beyond self-reports, given the often hidden and subjective nature of the phenomenon. The Self-Talk Scale (STS; Brinthaupt et al., 2009) is a self-report measure of self-talk frequency that has been shown to possess acceptable reliability and validity. However, no research using the STS has examined the accuracy of respondents’ self-reports. In the present paper, we report a series of studies directly examining the measurement of self-talk frequency and functions using the STS. The studies examine ways to validate self-reported self-talk by (1) comparing STS responses from 6 weeks earlier to recent experiences that might precipitate self-talk, (2) using experience sampling methods to determine whether STS scores are related to recent reports of self-talk over a period of a week, and (3) comparing self-reported STS scores to those provided by a significant other who rated the target on the STS. Results showed that (1) overall self-talk scores, particularly self-critical and self-reinforcing self-talk, were significantly related to reports of context-specific self-talk; (2) high STS scorers reported talking to themselves significantly more often during recent events compared to low STS scorers, and, contrary to expectations, (3) friends reported less agreement than strangers in their self-other self-talk ratings. Implications of the results for the validity of the STS and for measuring self-talk are presented. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4422081/ /pubmed/25999887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570 Text en Copyright © 2015 Brinthaupt, Benson, Kang and Moore. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Brinthaupt, Thomas M. Benson, Scott A. Kang, Minsoo Moore, Zaver D. Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk |
title | Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk |
title_full | Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk |
title_fullStr | Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk |
title_short | Assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk |
title_sort | assessing the accuracy of self-reported self-talk |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brinthauptthomasm assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk AT bensonscotta assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk AT kangminsoo assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk AT moorezaverd assessingtheaccuracyofselfreportedselftalk |