Cargando…

Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: While constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is one of the most promising techniques for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, it requires high residual function to start with. Robotic device, on the other hand, can provide intention-driven assistance and is proven capable to compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Susanto, Evan A, Tong, Raymond KY, Ockenfeld, Corinna, Ho, Newmen SK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25906983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0033-5
_version_ 1782370066802671616
author Susanto, Evan A
Tong, Raymond KY
Ockenfeld, Corinna
Ho, Newmen SK
author_facet Susanto, Evan A
Tong, Raymond KY
Ockenfeld, Corinna
Ho, Newmen SK
author_sort Susanto, Evan A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is one of the most promising techniques for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, it requires high residual function to start with. Robotic device, on the other hand, can provide intention-driven assistance and is proven capable to complement conventional therapy. However, with many robotic devices focus on more proximal joints like shoulder and elbow, recovery of hand and fingers functions have become a challenge. Here we propose the use of robotic device to assist hand and fingers functions training and we aim to evaluate the potential efficacy of intention-driven robot-assisted fingers training. METHODS: Participants (6 to 24 months post-stroke) were randomly assigned into two groups: robot-assisted (robot) and non-assisted (control) fingers training groups. Each participant underwent 20-session training. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) was used as the primary outcome measure, while, Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) score, its functional tasks (WMFT-FT) sub-score, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), its shoulder and elbow (FMA-SE) sub-score, and finger individuation index (FII) served as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Nineteen patients completed the 20-session training (Trial Registration: HKClinicalTrials.com HKCTR-1554); eighteen of them came back for a 6-month follow-up. Significant improvements (p < 0.05) were found in the clinical scores for both robot and control group after training. However, only robot group maintained the significant difference in the ARAT and FMA-SE six months after the training. The WMFT-FT score and time post-training improvements of robot group were significantly better than those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the potential efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training for hand and fingers rehabilitation and its feasibility to facilitate early rehabilitation for a wider population of stroke survivors; and hence, can be used to complement CIMT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4422529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44225292015-05-07 Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial Susanto, Evan A Tong, Raymond KY Ockenfeld, Corinna Ho, Newmen SK J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: While constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is one of the most promising techniques for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, it requires high residual function to start with. Robotic device, on the other hand, can provide intention-driven assistance and is proven capable to complement conventional therapy. However, with many robotic devices focus on more proximal joints like shoulder and elbow, recovery of hand and fingers functions have become a challenge. Here we propose the use of robotic device to assist hand and fingers functions training and we aim to evaluate the potential efficacy of intention-driven robot-assisted fingers training. METHODS: Participants (6 to 24 months post-stroke) were randomly assigned into two groups: robot-assisted (robot) and non-assisted (control) fingers training groups. Each participant underwent 20-session training. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) was used as the primary outcome measure, while, Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) score, its functional tasks (WMFT-FT) sub-score, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), its shoulder and elbow (FMA-SE) sub-score, and finger individuation index (FII) served as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Nineteen patients completed the 20-session training (Trial Registration: HKClinicalTrials.com HKCTR-1554); eighteen of them came back for a 6-month follow-up. Significant improvements (p < 0.05) were found in the clinical scores for both robot and control group after training. However, only robot group maintained the significant difference in the ARAT and FMA-SE six months after the training. The WMFT-FT score and time post-training improvements of robot group were significantly better than those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the potential efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training for hand and fingers rehabilitation and its feasibility to facilitate early rehabilitation for a wider population of stroke survivors; and hence, can be used to complement CIMT. BioMed Central 2015-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4422529/ /pubmed/25906983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0033-5 Text en © Susanto et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Susanto, Evan A
Tong, Raymond KY
Ockenfeld, Corinna
Ho, Newmen SK
Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
title Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25906983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0033-5
work_keys_str_mv AT susantoevana efficacyofrobotassistedfingerstraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tongraymondky efficacyofrobotassistedfingerstraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ockenfeldcorinna efficacyofrobotassistedfingerstraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT honewmensk efficacyofrobotassistedfingerstraininginchronicstrokesurvivorsapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial