Cargando…

Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?

BACKGROUND: Individual and area socio-economic status (SES) are significant predictors of morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries. However, the span in health from poorest to richest, that is, the socio-economic gradient, appears steeper for men than women. OBJECTIVE: Our aim i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Susan P., Hamberg, Katarina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25947541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27259
_version_ 1782370117471961088
author Phillips, Susan P.
Hamberg, Katarina
author_facet Phillips, Susan P.
Hamberg, Katarina
author_sort Phillips, Susan P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individual and area socio-economic status (SES) are significant predictors of morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries. However, the span in health from poorest to richest, that is, the socio-economic gradient, appears steeper for men than women. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to understand women's apparent immunity to the health harms of the SES gradient. DESIGN: Findings from a non-systematic search of Medline for population-based, SES gradient studies reporting results for both men and women and with health outcomes of morbidity, mortality or self-rated health (SRH) were reflectively analyzed. RESULTS: The 36 papers reviewed generally showed women to be relatively immune to the SES gradient for all but cardiovascular health outcomes. However, addressing the interconnected nature of socio-economic circumstances, exploring whether some measures of SES had ambiguous meanings for either women or men, including modifiers of SES such as household circumstances, social capital or area gender equity, or using indicators of area SES that were contextual rather than aggregates of individual, compositional measures increased the SES gradient for women. Outcome measures that combined mental and physical health, accounted for gender differences in SRH and adjusted for sex-specific differences in causes of mortality also explained some of the observed amelioration of the SES gradient among women. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic circumstances have a real and sustained impact on individual health. The SES gradient appears stronger for men than for women for all health outcomes other than heart disease. However, some of the observed variability between men and women may be an artifact of biased methodology. Considering webs of causation rather than individual markers of SES along with other sources of gender bias can explain much of women's blunted socio-economic gradient and deepen understanding of the pathways from SES to morbidity and mortality overall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4422842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44228422015-05-15 Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real? Phillips, Susan P. Hamberg, Katarina Glob Health Action Special Issue: Gender and Health BACKGROUND: Individual and area socio-economic status (SES) are significant predictors of morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries. However, the span in health from poorest to richest, that is, the socio-economic gradient, appears steeper for men than women. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to understand women's apparent immunity to the health harms of the SES gradient. DESIGN: Findings from a non-systematic search of Medline for population-based, SES gradient studies reporting results for both men and women and with health outcomes of morbidity, mortality or self-rated health (SRH) were reflectively analyzed. RESULTS: The 36 papers reviewed generally showed women to be relatively immune to the SES gradient for all but cardiovascular health outcomes. However, addressing the interconnected nature of socio-economic circumstances, exploring whether some measures of SES had ambiguous meanings for either women or men, including modifiers of SES such as household circumstances, social capital or area gender equity, or using indicators of area SES that were contextual rather than aggregates of individual, compositional measures increased the SES gradient for women. Outcome measures that combined mental and physical health, accounted for gender differences in SRH and adjusted for sex-specific differences in causes of mortality also explained some of the observed amelioration of the SES gradient among women. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic circumstances have a real and sustained impact on individual health. The SES gradient appears stronger for men than for women for all health outcomes other than heart disease. However, some of the observed variability between men and women may be an artifact of biased methodology. Considering webs of causation rather than individual markers of SES along with other sources of gender bias can explain much of women's blunted socio-economic gradient and deepen understanding of the pathways from SES to morbidity and mortality overall. Co-Action Publishing 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4422842/ /pubmed/25947541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27259 Text en © 2015 Susan P. Phillips and Katarina Hamberg http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Special Issue: Gender and Health
Phillips, Susan P.
Hamberg, Katarina
Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
title Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
title_full Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
title_fullStr Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
title_full_unstemmed Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
title_short Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
title_sort women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?
topic Special Issue: Gender and Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25947541
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27259
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipssusanp womensrelativeimmunitytothesocioeconomichealthgradientartifactorreal
AT hambergkatarina womensrelativeimmunitytothesocioeconomichealthgradientartifactorreal