Cargando…

Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Although recent trends in laparoscopic procedures have been toward minimizing the number of incisions, four or five ports are normally required to complete laparoscopic gastrectomy because of the complexity of this procedure. Multi-channel ports, such as the SILS port (Covidien, JAPAN),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashiwagi, Hiroyuki, Kumagai, Kenta, Monma, Eiji, Nozue, Mutsumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3827-9
_version_ 1782370119267123200
author Kashiwagi, Hiroyuki
Kumagai, Kenta
Monma, Eiji
Nozue, Mutsumi
author_facet Kashiwagi, Hiroyuki
Kumagai, Kenta
Monma, Eiji
Nozue, Mutsumi
author_sort Kashiwagi, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although recent trends in laparoscopic procedures have been toward minimizing the number of incisions, four or five ports are normally required to complete laparoscopic gastrectomy because of the complexity of this procedure. Multi-channel ports, such as the SILS port (Covidien, JAPAN), are now available and are crucial for performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) or reduced port surgery (RPS). We carried out reduced port distal gastrectomy (RPDG) using a dual-port method with a SILS port. METHODS: Ten patients who were diagnosed as early stage gastric cancer were offered the RPDG. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 68.1 and 21.4, respectively. No distant metastasis or regional lymph node swelling was seen in any case. A 5-mm flexible scope (Olympus, JAPAN) and SILS port were used and a nylon ligature with a straight needle, instead of a surgical instrument, was available to raise the gastric wall. RESULTS: The average operative time was 266.9 ± 38.3 min and blood loss was 37.8 ± 56.8 ml. Patients recovered well and experienced no complications after surgery. All patients could tolerate soft meals on the first day after surgery and the average hospital stay was 8.1 days. Past conventional LAG cases were evaluated to compare the short-term outcome and no difference was seen in the mean operative time or operative blood loss. The length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter for the RPDG group than the conventional operation group (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the trend of serum CRP elevation after surgery was lower in the RPDG group than the conventional LAG group (p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Although the benefits of RPS have not been established, this type of surgery may be expected to have some advantages. Cosmetic benefits and shorter hospital stays are clear advantages. Less invasiveness can be expected according to the trend of serum CRP elevation after RPDG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4422851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44228512015-05-13 Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer Kashiwagi, Hiroyuki Kumagai, Kenta Monma, Eiji Nozue, Mutsumi Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Although recent trends in laparoscopic procedures have been toward minimizing the number of incisions, four or five ports are normally required to complete laparoscopic gastrectomy because of the complexity of this procedure. Multi-channel ports, such as the SILS port (Covidien, JAPAN), are now available and are crucial for performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) or reduced port surgery (RPS). We carried out reduced port distal gastrectomy (RPDG) using a dual-port method with a SILS port. METHODS: Ten patients who were diagnosed as early stage gastric cancer were offered the RPDG. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 68.1 and 21.4, respectively. No distant metastasis or regional lymph node swelling was seen in any case. A 5-mm flexible scope (Olympus, JAPAN) and SILS port were used and a nylon ligature with a straight needle, instead of a surgical instrument, was available to raise the gastric wall. RESULTS: The average operative time was 266.9 ± 38.3 min and blood loss was 37.8 ± 56.8 ml. Patients recovered well and experienced no complications after surgery. All patients could tolerate soft meals on the first day after surgery and the average hospital stay was 8.1 days. Past conventional LAG cases were evaluated to compare the short-term outcome and no difference was seen in the mean operative time or operative blood loss. The length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter for the RPDG group than the conventional operation group (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the trend of serum CRP elevation after surgery was lower in the RPDG group than the conventional LAG group (p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Although the benefits of RPS have not been established, this type of surgery may be expected to have some advantages. Cosmetic benefits and shorter hospital stays are clear advantages. Less invasiveness can be expected according to the trend of serum CRP elevation after RPDG. Springer US 2014-08-27 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4422851/ /pubmed/25159658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3827-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Kashiwagi, Hiroyuki
Kumagai, Kenta
Monma, Eiji
Nozue, Mutsumi
Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer
title Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer
title_full Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer
title_fullStr Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer
title_short Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer
title_sort dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4422851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3827-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kashiwagihiroyuki dualportdistalgastrectomyfortheearlygastriccancer
AT kumagaikenta dualportdistalgastrectomyfortheearlygastriccancer
AT monmaeiji dualportdistalgastrectomyfortheearlygastriccancer
AT nozuemutsumi dualportdistalgastrectomyfortheearlygastriccancer