Cargando…

Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods

BACKGROUND: Genetic selection has been successful in achieving increased production in dairy cattle; however, corresponding declines in fitness traits have been documented. Selection for fitness traits is more difficult, since they have low heritabilities and are influenced by various non-genetic fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parker Gaddis, Kristen L, Tiezzi, Francesco, Cole, John B, Clay, John S, Maltecca, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25951822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0093-9
_version_ 1782370154509762560
author Parker Gaddis, Kristen L
Tiezzi, Francesco
Cole, John B
Clay, John S
Maltecca, Christian
author_facet Parker Gaddis, Kristen L
Tiezzi, Francesco
Cole, John B
Clay, John S
Maltecca, Christian
author_sort Parker Gaddis, Kristen L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetic selection has been successful in achieving increased production in dairy cattle; however, corresponding declines in fitness traits have been documented. Selection for fitness traits is more difficult, since they have low heritabilities and are influenced by various non-genetic factors. The objective of this paper was to investigate the predictive ability of two-stage and single-step genomic selection methods applied to health data collected from on-farm computer systems in the U.S. METHODS: Implementation of single-trait and two-trait sire models was investigated using BayesA and single-step methods for mastitis and somatic cell score. Variance components were estimated. The complete dataset was divided into training and validation sets to perform model comparison. Estimated sire breeding values were used to estimate the number of daughters expected to develop mastitis. Predictive ability of each model was assessed by the sum of χ(2) values that compared predicted and observed numbers of daughters with mastitis and the proportion of wrong predictions. RESULTS: According to the model applied, estimated heritabilities of liability to mastitis ranged from 0.05 (SD=0.02) to 0.11 (SD=0.03) and estimated heritabilities of somatic cell score ranged from 0.08 (SD=0.01) to 0.18 (SD=0.03). Posterior mean of genetic correlation between mastitis and somatic cell score was equal to 0.63 (SD=0.17). The single-step method had the best predictive ability. Conversely, the smallest number of wrong predictions was obtained with the univariate BayesA model. The best model fit was found for single-step and pedigree-based models. Bivariate single-step analysis had a better predictive ability than bivariate BayesA; however, the latter led to the smallest number of wrong predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic data improved our ability to predict animal breeding values. Performance of genomic selection methods depends on a multitude of factors. Heritability of traits and reliability of genotyped individuals has a large impact on the performance of genomic evaluation methods. Given the current characteristics of producer-recorded health data, single-step methods have several advantages compared to two-step methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4423125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44231252015-05-08 Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods Parker Gaddis, Kristen L Tiezzi, Francesco Cole, John B Clay, John S Maltecca, Christian Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Genetic selection has been successful in achieving increased production in dairy cattle; however, corresponding declines in fitness traits have been documented. Selection for fitness traits is more difficult, since they have low heritabilities and are influenced by various non-genetic factors. The objective of this paper was to investigate the predictive ability of two-stage and single-step genomic selection methods applied to health data collected from on-farm computer systems in the U.S. METHODS: Implementation of single-trait and two-trait sire models was investigated using BayesA and single-step methods for mastitis and somatic cell score. Variance components were estimated. The complete dataset was divided into training and validation sets to perform model comparison. Estimated sire breeding values were used to estimate the number of daughters expected to develop mastitis. Predictive ability of each model was assessed by the sum of χ(2) values that compared predicted and observed numbers of daughters with mastitis and the proportion of wrong predictions. RESULTS: According to the model applied, estimated heritabilities of liability to mastitis ranged from 0.05 (SD=0.02) to 0.11 (SD=0.03) and estimated heritabilities of somatic cell score ranged from 0.08 (SD=0.01) to 0.18 (SD=0.03). Posterior mean of genetic correlation between mastitis and somatic cell score was equal to 0.63 (SD=0.17). The single-step method had the best predictive ability. Conversely, the smallest number of wrong predictions was obtained with the univariate BayesA model. The best model fit was found for single-step and pedigree-based models. Bivariate single-step analysis had a better predictive ability than bivariate BayesA; however, the latter led to the smallest number of wrong predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic data improved our ability to predict animal breeding values. Performance of genomic selection methods depends on a multitude of factors. Heritability of traits and reliability of genotyped individuals has a large impact on the performance of genomic evaluation methods. Given the current characteristics of producer-recorded health data, single-step methods have several advantages compared to two-step methods. BioMed Central 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4423125/ /pubmed/25951822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0093-9 Text en © Parker Gaddis et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Parker Gaddis, Kristen L
Tiezzi, Francesco
Cole, John B
Clay, John S
Maltecca, Christian
Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods
title Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods
title_full Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods
title_fullStr Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods
title_full_unstemmed Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods
title_short Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods
title_sort genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25951822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0093-9
work_keys_str_mv AT parkergaddiskristenl genomicpredictionofdiseaseoccurrenceusingproducerrecordedhealthdataacomparisonofmethods
AT tiezzifrancesco genomicpredictionofdiseaseoccurrenceusingproducerrecordedhealthdataacomparisonofmethods
AT colejohnb genomicpredictionofdiseaseoccurrenceusingproducerrecordedhealthdataacomparisonofmethods
AT clayjohns genomicpredictionofdiseaseoccurrenceusingproducerrecordedhealthdataacomparisonofmethods
AT malteccachristian genomicpredictionofdiseaseoccurrenceusingproducerrecordedhealthdataacomparisonofmethods