Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

AIMS: Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Searches in Embase and PubMed we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Zhi-De, Wei, Ting-Ting, Yang, Min, Ma, Ning, Tang, Qing-Qin, Qin, Bao-Dong, Fu, Hai-Tao, Zhong, Ren-Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25951060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126444
_version_ 1782370263390748672
author Hu, Zhi-De
Wei, Ting-Ting
Yang, Min
Ma, Ning
Tang, Qing-Qin
Qin, Bao-Dong
Fu, Hai-Tao
Zhong, Ren-Qian
author_facet Hu, Zhi-De
Wei, Ting-Ting
Yang, Min
Ma, Ning
Tang, Qing-Qin
Qin, Bao-Dong
Fu, Hai-Tao
Zhong, Ren-Qian
author_sort Hu, Zhi-De
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Searches in Embase and PubMed were conducted, in order to identify eligible studies on osteopontin expression and its diagnostic value in ovarian cancer. The revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to examine the quality of these studies and the overall osteopontin diagnostic accuracy in ovarian cancer was pooled using the bivariate model. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Deek’s test. This search methodology resulted in 13 studies with a total of 839 ovarian cancer patients and 1439 controls in this meta-analysis. The overall osteopontin diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ovarian cancer were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51–0.78) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78–0.93), respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves (AUC) was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.81–0.88). There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. However, a major design deficiency of the eligible studies is the issue of subject selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Osteopontin could be a useful biomarker in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Due to the design deficits of the eligible studies, a future study with a larger sample size and better design is needed to rigorously confirm the diagnostic potential of osteopontin in ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4423864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44238642015-05-13 Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Hu, Zhi-De Wei, Ting-Ting Yang, Min Ma, Ning Tang, Qing-Qin Qin, Bao-Dong Fu, Hai-Tao Zhong, Ren-Qian PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Searches in Embase and PubMed were conducted, in order to identify eligible studies on osteopontin expression and its diagnostic value in ovarian cancer. The revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to examine the quality of these studies and the overall osteopontin diagnostic accuracy in ovarian cancer was pooled using the bivariate model. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Deek’s test. This search methodology resulted in 13 studies with a total of 839 ovarian cancer patients and 1439 controls in this meta-analysis. The overall osteopontin diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ovarian cancer were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51–0.78) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78–0.93), respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves (AUC) was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.81–0.88). There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. However, a major design deficiency of the eligible studies is the issue of subject selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Osteopontin could be a useful biomarker in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Due to the design deficits of the eligible studies, a future study with a larger sample size and better design is needed to rigorously confirm the diagnostic potential of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. Public Library of Science 2015-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4423864/ /pubmed/25951060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126444 Text en © 2015 Hu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Zhi-De
Wei, Ting-Ting
Yang, Min
Ma, Ning
Tang, Qing-Qin
Qin, Bao-Dong
Fu, Hai-Tao
Zhong, Ren-Qian
Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_full Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_short Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
title_sort diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25951060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126444
work_keys_str_mv AT huzhide diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT weitingting diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT yangmin diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT maning diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT tangqingqin diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT qinbaodong diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT fuhaitao diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT zhongrenqian diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview