Cargando…
Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
AIMS: Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Searches in Embase and PubMed we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25951060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126444 |
_version_ | 1782370263390748672 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Zhi-De Wei, Ting-Ting Yang, Min Ma, Ning Tang, Qing-Qin Qin, Bao-Dong Fu, Hai-Tao Zhong, Ren-Qian |
author_facet | Hu, Zhi-De Wei, Ting-Ting Yang, Min Ma, Ning Tang, Qing-Qin Qin, Bao-Dong Fu, Hai-Tao Zhong, Ren-Qian |
author_sort | Hu, Zhi-De |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Searches in Embase and PubMed were conducted, in order to identify eligible studies on osteopontin expression and its diagnostic value in ovarian cancer. The revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to examine the quality of these studies and the overall osteopontin diagnostic accuracy in ovarian cancer was pooled using the bivariate model. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Deek’s test. This search methodology resulted in 13 studies with a total of 839 ovarian cancer patients and 1439 controls in this meta-analysis. The overall osteopontin diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ovarian cancer were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51–0.78) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78–0.93), respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves (AUC) was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.81–0.88). There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. However, a major design deficiency of the eligible studies is the issue of subject selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Osteopontin could be a useful biomarker in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Due to the design deficits of the eligible studies, a future study with a larger sample size and better design is needed to rigorously confirm the diagnostic potential of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4423864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44238642015-05-13 Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Hu, Zhi-De Wei, Ting-Ting Yang, Min Ma, Ning Tang, Qing-Qin Qin, Bao-Dong Fu, Hai-Tao Zhong, Ren-Qian PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Searches in Embase and PubMed were conducted, in order to identify eligible studies on osteopontin expression and its diagnostic value in ovarian cancer. The revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to examine the quality of these studies and the overall osteopontin diagnostic accuracy in ovarian cancer was pooled using the bivariate model. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Deek’s test. This search methodology resulted in 13 studies with a total of 839 ovarian cancer patients and 1439 controls in this meta-analysis. The overall osteopontin diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ovarian cancer were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51–0.78) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78–0.93), respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves (AUC) was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.81–0.88). There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. However, a major design deficiency of the eligible studies is the issue of subject selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Osteopontin could be a useful biomarker in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Due to the design deficits of the eligible studies, a future study with a larger sample size and better design is needed to rigorously confirm the diagnostic potential of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. Public Library of Science 2015-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4423864/ /pubmed/25951060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126444 Text en © 2015 Hu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hu, Zhi-De Wei, Ting-Ting Yang, Min Ma, Ning Tang, Qing-Qin Qin, Bao-Dong Fu, Hai-Tao Zhong, Ren-Qian Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title | Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_sort | diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25951060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huzhide diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT weitingting diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT yangmin diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT maning diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT tangqingqin diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT qinbaodong diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT fuhaitao diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT zhongrenqian diagnosticvalueofosteopontininovariancancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview |