Cargando…
DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of current influenza vaccines is limited in vulnerable populations. DNA vaccines can be produced rapidly, and may offer a potential strategy to improve vaccine immunogenicity, indicated by studies with H5 influenza DNA vaccine prime followed by inactivated vaccine boost. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25950433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125914 |
_version_ | 1782370288441229312 |
---|---|
author | Ledgerwood, Julie E. Bellamy, Abbie R. Belshe, Robert Bernstein, David I. Edupuganti, Srilatha Patel, Shital M. Renehan, Phyllis Zajdowicz, Thad Schwartz, Richard Koup, Richard Bailer, Robert T. Yamshchikov, Galina V. Enama, Mary E. Sarwar, Uzma Larkin, Brenda Graham, Barney S. |
author_facet | Ledgerwood, Julie E. Bellamy, Abbie R. Belshe, Robert Bernstein, David I. Edupuganti, Srilatha Patel, Shital M. Renehan, Phyllis Zajdowicz, Thad Schwartz, Richard Koup, Richard Bailer, Robert T. Yamshchikov, Galina V. Enama, Mary E. Sarwar, Uzma Larkin, Brenda Graham, Barney S. |
author_sort | Ledgerwood, Julie E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The efficacy of current influenza vaccines is limited in vulnerable populations. DNA vaccines can be produced rapidly, and may offer a potential strategy to improve vaccine immunogenicity, indicated by studies with H5 influenza DNA vaccine prime followed by inactivated vaccine boost. METHODS: Four sites enrolled healthy adults, randomized to receive 2011/12 seasonal influenza DNA vaccine prime (n=65) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (n=66) administered intramuscularly with Biojector. All subjects received the 2012/13 seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine, trivalent (IIV3) 36 weeks after the priming injection. Vaccine safety and tolerability was the primary objective and measurement of antibody response by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) was the secondary objective. RESULTS: The DNA vaccine prime-IIV3 boost regimen was safe and well tolerated. Significant differences in HAI responses between the DNA vaccine prime and the PBS prime groups were not detected in this study. CONCLUSION: While DNA priming significantly improved the response to a conventional monovalent H5 vaccine in a previous study, it was not effective in adults using seasonal influenza strains, possibly due to pre-existing immunity to the prime, unmatched prime and boost antigens, or the lengthy 36 week boost interval. Careful optimization of the DNA prime-IIV3 boost regimen as related to antigen matching, interval between vaccinations, and pre-existing immune responses to influenza is likely to be needed in further evaluations of this vaccine strategy. In particular, testing this concept in younger age groups with less prior exposure to seasonal influenza strains may be informative. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01498718 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4423975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44239752015-05-13 DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Ledgerwood, Julie E. Bellamy, Abbie R. Belshe, Robert Bernstein, David I. Edupuganti, Srilatha Patel, Shital M. Renehan, Phyllis Zajdowicz, Thad Schwartz, Richard Koup, Richard Bailer, Robert T. Yamshchikov, Galina V. Enama, Mary E. Sarwar, Uzma Larkin, Brenda Graham, Barney S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The efficacy of current influenza vaccines is limited in vulnerable populations. DNA vaccines can be produced rapidly, and may offer a potential strategy to improve vaccine immunogenicity, indicated by studies with H5 influenza DNA vaccine prime followed by inactivated vaccine boost. METHODS: Four sites enrolled healthy adults, randomized to receive 2011/12 seasonal influenza DNA vaccine prime (n=65) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (n=66) administered intramuscularly with Biojector. All subjects received the 2012/13 seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine, trivalent (IIV3) 36 weeks after the priming injection. Vaccine safety and tolerability was the primary objective and measurement of antibody response by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) was the secondary objective. RESULTS: The DNA vaccine prime-IIV3 boost regimen was safe and well tolerated. Significant differences in HAI responses between the DNA vaccine prime and the PBS prime groups were not detected in this study. CONCLUSION: While DNA priming significantly improved the response to a conventional monovalent H5 vaccine in a previous study, it was not effective in adults using seasonal influenza strains, possibly due to pre-existing immunity to the prime, unmatched prime and boost antigens, or the lengthy 36 week boost interval. Careful optimization of the DNA prime-IIV3 boost regimen as related to antigen matching, interval between vaccinations, and pre-existing immune responses to influenza is likely to be needed in further evaluations of this vaccine strategy. In particular, testing this concept in younger age groups with less prior exposure to seasonal influenza strains may be informative. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01498718 Public Library of Science 2015-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4423975/ /pubmed/25950433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125914 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ledgerwood, Julie E. Bellamy, Abbie R. Belshe, Robert Bernstein, David I. Edupuganti, Srilatha Patel, Shital M. Renehan, Phyllis Zajdowicz, Thad Schwartz, Richard Koup, Richard Bailer, Robert T. Yamshchikov, Galina V. Enama, Mary E. Sarwar, Uzma Larkin, Brenda Graham, Barney S. DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | DNA Priming for Seasonal Influenza Vaccine: A Phase 1b Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | dna priming for seasonal influenza vaccine: a phase 1b double-blind randomized clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4423975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25950433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125914 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ledgerwoodjuliee dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bellamyabbier dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT belsherobert dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bernsteindavidi dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT edupugantisrilatha dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT patelshitalm dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT renehanphyllis dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zajdowiczthad dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT schwartzrichard dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT kouprichard dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bailerrobertt dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT yamshchikovgalinav dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT enamamarye dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT sarwaruzma dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT larkinbrenda dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT grahambarneys dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT dnaprimingforseasonalinfluenzavaccineaphase1bdoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial |