Cargando…

Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents

Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Youn, Hyejin, Strumsky, Deborah, Bettencourt, Luis M. A., Lobo, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25904530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0272
_version_ 1782370362463354880
author Youn, Hyejin
Strumsky, Deborah
Bettencourt, Luis M. A.
Lobo, José
author_facet Youn, Hyejin
Strumsky, Deborah
Bettencourt, Luis M. A.
Lobo, José
author_sort Youn, Hyejin
collection PubMed
description Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of ‘exploitation’ (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and ‘exploration’ (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities—the building blocks to be combined—that has significantly slowed down. We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4424706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44247062015-05-20 Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents Youn, Hyejin Strumsky, Deborah Bettencourt, Luis M. A. Lobo, José J R Soc Interface Research Articles Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of ‘exploitation’ (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and ‘exploration’ (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities—the building blocks to be combined—that has significantly slowed down. We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations. The Royal Society 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4424706/ /pubmed/25904530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0272 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Youn, Hyejin
Strumsky, Deborah
Bettencourt, Luis M. A.
Lobo, José
Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents
title Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents
title_full Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents
title_fullStr Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents
title_full_unstemmed Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents
title_short Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents
title_sort invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from us patents
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25904530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0272
work_keys_str_mv AT younhyejin inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents
AT strumskydeborah inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents
AT bettencourtluisma inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents
AT lobojose inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents