Cargando…
Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents
Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatori...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25904530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0272 |
_version_ | 1782370362463354880 |
---|---|
author | Youn, Hyejin Strumsky, Deborah Bettencourt, Luis M. A. Lobo, José |
author_facet | Youn, Hyejin Strumsky, Deborah Bettencourt, Luis M. A. Lobo, José |
author_sort | Youn, Hyejin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of ‘exploitation’ (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and ‘exploration’ (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities—the building blocks to be combined—that has significantly slowed down. We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4424706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44247062015-05-20 Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents Youn, Hyejin Strumsky, Deborah Bettencourt, Luis M. A. Lobo, José J R Soc Interface Research Articles Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of ‘exploitation’ (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and ‘exploration’ (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities—the building blocks to be combined—that has significantly slowed down. We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations. The Royal Society 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4424706/ /pubmed/25904530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0272 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Youn, Hyejin Strumsky, Deborah Bettencourt, Luis M. A. Lobo, José Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents |
title | Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents |
title_full | Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents |
title_fullStr | Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents |
title_full_unstemmed | Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents |
title_short | Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents |
title_sort | invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from us patents |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25904530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT younhyejin inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents AT strumskydeborah inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents AT bettencourtluisma inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents AT lobojose inventionasacombinatorialprocessevidencefromuspatents |