Cargando…

Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)

Background: The optimal method of diminutive polypectomy (< 6 mm) is unknown. Objective: To assess the rates of incomplete resection of diminutive polyps of the colon using three standard polyp resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps). Design: Randomized, pilot study....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez, Victoria, Badillo, Raul J., Crook, Julia E., Krishna, Murli, Diehl, Nancy N., Wallace, Michael B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26134778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390789
_version_ 1782370393541050368
author Gómez, Victoria
Badillo, Raul J.
Crook, Julia E.
Krishna, Murli
Diehl, Nancy N.
Wallace, Michael B.
author_facet Gómez, Victoria
Badillo, Raul J.
Crook, Julia E.
Krishna, Murli
Diehl, Nancy N.
Wallace, Michael B.
author_sort Gómez, Victoria
collection PubMed
description Background: The optimal method of diminutive polypectomy (< 6 mm) is unknown. Objective: To assess the rates of incomplete resection of diminutive polyps of the colon using three standard polyp resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps). Design: Randomized, pilot study. Settings: Single-center endoscopy center. Patients: Patients undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies. Interventions: Polypectomy was performed using the method to which the patient was randomized. Following retrieval of the polyp, the polypectomy base was lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline and then excised using the cold snare device. If no tissue could be removed, then at least four cold biopsies using forceps of the remaining margin were obtained. Main outcome measures: Adequacy of resection of diminutive polyps, which was defined as no visible adenoma or hyperplastic tissue seen in the base tissue on histology. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled (57 % male), the mean age was 60 (range 33 – 82), and 62 polyps were randomized from 37 patients. The mean polyp size was 3.6 mm (range 2 – 5 mm) and 37 polyps (60 %) were adenomatous. Overall incomplete polyp resection rate was 9 % (95 %CI 3 – 19 %), 5 of 37 (14 %) for adenomas. By the study arm, the incomplete resection rates were 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold biopsy forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most of the endoscopists did not feel that the saline lift cold snare method was feasible or appropriate. Limitations: Small sample size; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of the polyp base tissue was not routinely performed. Conclusions: Recruiting patients to a pilot study that randomized polyps to one of three common methods of polypectomy for diminutive polyps was feasible, and approximately 1 in 10 diminutive polyps found on colonoscopy were incompletely resected by standard polypectomy methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4424867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44248672015-06-23 Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos) Gómez, Victoria Badillo, Raul J. Crook, Julia E. Krishna, Murli Diehl, Nancy N. Wallace, Michael B. Endosc Int Open Article Background: The optimal method of diminutive polypectomy (< 6 mm) is unknown. Objective: To assess the rates of incomplete resection of diminutive polyps of the colon using three standard polyp resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps). Design: Randomized, pilot study. Settings: Single-center endoscopy center. Patients: Patients undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies. Interventions: Polypectomy was performed using the method to which the patient was randomized. Following retrieval of the polyp, the polypectomy base was lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline and then excised using the cold snare device. If no tissue could be removed, then at least four cold biopsies using forceps of the remaining margin were obtained. Main outcome measures: Adequacy of resection of diminutive polyps, which was defined as no visible adenoma or hyperplastic tissue seen in the base tissue on histology. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled (57 % male), the mean age was 60 (range 33 – 82), and 62 polyps were randomized from 37 patients. The mean polyp size was 3.6 mm (range 2 – 5 mm) and 37 polyps (60 %) were adenomatous. Overall incomplete polyp resection rate was 9 % (95 %CI 3 – 19 %), 5 of 37 (14 %) for adenomas. By the study arm, the incomplete resection rates were 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold biopsy forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most of the endoscopists did not feel that the saline lift cold snare method was feasible or appropriate. Limitations: Small sample size; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of the polyp base tissue was not routinely performed. Conclusions: Recruiting patients to a pilot study that randomized polyps to one of three common methods of polypectomy for diminutive polyps was feasible, and approximately 1 in 10 diminutive polyps found on colonoscopy were incompletely resected by standard polypectomy methods. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-02 2014-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4424867/ /pubmed/26134778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390789 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Gómez, Victoria
Badillo, Raul J.
Crook, Julia E.
Krishna, Murli
Diehl, Nancy N.
Wallace, Michael B.
Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)
title Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)
title_full Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)
title_fullStr Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)
title_full_unstemmed Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)
title_short Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)
title_sort diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26134778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390789
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezvictoria diminutivecolorectalpolypresectioncomparinghotandcoldsnareandcoldbiopsyforcepspolypectomyresultsofapilotrandomizedsinglecenterstudywithvideos
AT badilloraulj diminutivecolorectalpolypresectioncomparinghotandcoldsnareandcoldbiopsyforcepspolypectomyresultsofapilotrandomizedsinglecenterstudywithvideos
AT crookjuliae diminutivecolorectalpolypresectioncomparinghotandcoldsnareandcoldbiopsyforcepspolypectomyresultsofapilotrandomizedsinglecenterstudywithvideos
AT krishnamurli diminutivecolorectalpolypresectioncomparinghotandcoldsnareandcoldbiopsyforcepspolypectomyresultsofapilotrandomizedsinglecenterstudywithvideos
AT diehlnancyn diminutivecolorectalpolypresectioncomparinghotandcoldsnareandcoldbiopsyforcepspolypectomyresultsofapilotrandomizedsinglecenterstudywithvideos
AT wallacemichaelb diminutivecolorectalpolypresectioncomparinghotandcoldsnareandcoldbiopsyforcepspolypectomyresultsofapilotrandomizedsinglecenterstudywithvideos