Cargando…

Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes

The current fossil fuel-based generation of energy has led to large-scale industrial development. However, the reliance on fossil fuels leads to the significant depletion of natural resources of buried combustible geologic deposits and to negative effects on the global climate with emissions of gree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrasekhar, Kuppam, Lee, Yong-Jik, Lee, Dong-Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874756
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms16048266
_version_ 1782370437893718016
author Chandrasekhar, Kuppam
Lee, Yong-Jik
Lee, Dong-Woo
author_facet Chandrasekhar, Kuppam
Lee, Yong-Jik
Lee, Dong-Woo
author_sort Chandrasekhar, Kuppam
collection PubMed
description The current fossil fuel-based generation of energy has led to large-scale industrial development. However, the reliance on fossil fuels leads to the significant depletion of natural resources of buried combustible geologic deposits and to negative effects on the global climate with emissions of greenhouse gases. Accordingly, enormous efforts are directed to transition from fossil fuels to nonpolluting and renewable energy sources. One potential alternative is biohydrogen (H(2)), a clean energy carrier with high-energy yields; upon the combustion of H(2), H(2)O is the only major by-product. In recent decades, the attractive and renewable characteristics of H(2) led us to develop a variety of biological routes for the production of H(2). Based on the mode of H(2) generation, the biological routes for H(2) production are categorized into four groups: photobiological fermentation, anaerobic fermentation, enzymatic and microbial electrolysis, and a combination of these processes. Thus, this review primarily focuses on the evaluation of the biological routes for the production of H(2). In particular, we assess the efficiency and feasibility of these bioprocesses with respect to the factors that affect operations, and we delineate the limitations. Additionally, alternative options such as bioaugmentation, multiple process integration, and microbial electrolysis to improve process efficiency are discussed to address industrial-level applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4425080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44250802015-05-20 Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes Chandrasekhar, Kuppam Lee, Yong-Jik Lee, Dong-Woo Int J Mol Sci Review The current fossil fuel-based generation of energy has led to large-scale industrial development. However, the reliance on fossil fuels leads to the significant depletion of natural resources of buried combustible geologic deposits and to negative effects on the global climate with emissions of greenhouse gases. Accordingly, enormous efforts are directed to transition from fossil fuels to nonpolluting and renewable energy sources. One potential alternative is biohydrogen (H(2)), a clean energy carrier with high-energy yields; upon the combustion of H(2), H(2)O is the only major by-product. In recent decades, the attractive and renewable characteristics of H(2) led us to develop a variety of biological routes for the production of H(2). Based on the mode of H(2) generation, the biological routes for H(2) production are categorized into four groups: photobiological fermentation, anaerobic fermentation, enzymatic and microbial electrolysis, and a combination of these processes. Thus, this review primarily focuses on the evaluation of the biological routes for the production of H(2). In particular, we assess the efficiency and feasibility of these bioprocesses with respect to the factors that affect operations, and we delineate the limitations. Additionally, alternative options such as bioaugmentation, multiple process integration, and microbial electrolysis to improve process efficiency are discussed to address industrial-level applications. MDPI 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4425080/ /pubmed/25874756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms16048266 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chandrasekhar, Kuppam
Lee, Yong-Jik
Lee, Dong-Woo
Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes
title Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes
title_full Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes
title_fullStr Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes
title_full_unstemmed Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes
title_short Biohydrogen Production: Strategies to Improve Process Efficiency through Microbial Routes
title_sort biohydrogen production: strategies to improve process efficiency through microbial routes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25874756
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms16048266
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrasekharkuppam biohydrogenproductionstrategiestoimproveprocessefficiencythroughmicrobialroutes
AT leeyongjik biohydrogenproductionstrategiestoimproveprocessefficiencythroughmicrobialroutes
AT leedongwoo biohydrogenproductionstrategiestoimproveprocessefficiencythroughmicrobialroutes