Cargando…
Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species
The cosmopolitan ascidian Ciona intestinalis is the most common model species of Tunicata, the sister-group of Vertebrata, and widely used in developmental biology, genomics and evolutionary studies. Recently, molecular studies suggested the presence of cryptic species hidden within the C. intestina...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122879 |
_version_ | 1782370499294134272 |
---|---|
author | Pennati, Roberta Ficetola, Gentile Francesco Brunetti, Riccardo Caicci, Federico Gasparini, Fabio Griggio, Francesca Sato, Atsuko Stach, Thomas Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina Gissi, Carmela Manni, Lucia |
author_facet | Pennati, Roberta Ficetola, Gentile Francesco Brunetti, Riccardo Caicci, Federico Gasparini, Fabio Griggio, Francesca Sato, Atsuko Stach, Thomas Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina Gissi, Carmela Manni, Lucia |
author_sort | Pennati, Roberta |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cosmopolitan ascidian Ciona intestinalis is the most common model species of Tunicata, the sister-group of Vertebrata, and widely used in developmental biology, genomics and evolutionary studies. Recently, molecular studies suggested the presence of cryptic species hidden within the C. intestinalis species, namely C. intestinalis type A and type B. So far, no substantial morphological differences have been identified between individuals belonging to the two types. Here we present morphometric, immunohistochemical, and histological analyses, as well as 3-D reconstructions, of late larvae obtained by cross-fertilization experiments of molecularly determined type A and type B adults, sampled in different seasons and in four different localities. Our data point to quantitative and qualitative differences in the trunk shape of larvae belonging to the two types. In particular, type B larvae exhibit a longer pre-oral lobe, longer and relatively narrower total body length, and a shorter ocellus-tail distance than type A larvae. All these differences were found to be statistically significant in a Discriminant Analysis. Depending on the number of analyzed parameters, the obtained discriminant function was able to correctly classify > 93% of the larvae, with the remaining misclassified larvae attributable to the existence of intra-type seasonal variability. No larval differences were observed at the level of histology and immunohistochemical localization of peripheral sensory neurons. We conclude that type A and type B are two distinct species that can be distinguished on the basis of larval morphology and molecular data. Since the identified larval differences appear to be valid diagnostic characters, we suggest to raise both types to the rank of species and to assign them distinct names. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4425531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44255312015-05-21 Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species Pennati, Roberta Ficetola, Gentile Francesco Brunetti, Riccardo Caicci, Federico Gasparini, Fabio Griggio, Francesca Sato, Atsuko Stach, Thomas Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina Gissi, Carmela Manni, Lucia PLoS One Research Article The cosmopolitan ascidian Ciona intestinalis is the most common model species of Tunicata, the sister-group of Vertebrata, and widely used in developmental biology, genomics and evolutionary studies. Recently, molecular studies suggested the presence of cryptic species hidden within the C. intestinalis species, namely C. intestinalis type A and type B. So far, no substantial morphological differences have been identified between individuals belonging to the two types. Here we present morphometric, immunohistochemical, and histological analyses, as well as 3-D reconstructions, of late larvae obtained by cross-fertilization experiments of molecularly determined type A and type B adults, sampled in different seasons and in four different localities. Our data point to quantitative and qualitative differences in the trunk shape of larvae belonging to the two types. In particular, type B larvae exhibit a longer pre-oral lobe, longer and relatively narrower total body length, and a shorter ocellus-tail distance than type A larvae. All these differences were found to be statistically significant in a Discriminant Analysis. Depending on the number of analyzed parameters, the obtained discriminant function was able to correctly classify > 93% of the larvae, with the remaining misclassified larvae attributable to the existence of intra-type seasonal variability. No larval differences were observed at the level of histology and immunohistochemical localization of peripheral sensory neurons. We conclude that type A and type B are two distinct species that can be distinguished on the basis of larval morphology and molecular data. Since the identified larval differences appear to be valid diagnostic characters, we suggest to raise both types to the rank of species and to assign them distinct names. Public Library of Science 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4425531/ /pubmed/25955391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122879 Text en © 2015 Pennati et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pennati, Roberta Ficetola, Gentile Francesco Brunetti, Riccardo Caicci, Federico Gasparini, Fabio Griggio, Francesca Sato, Atsuko Stach, Thomas Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina Gissi, Carmela Manni, Lucia Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species |
title | Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species |
title_full | Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species |
title_fullStr | Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species |
title_short | Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species |
title_sort | morphological differences between larvae of the ciona intestinalis species complex: hints for a valid taxonomic definition of distinct species |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pennatiroberta morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT ficetolagentilefrancesco morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT brunettiriccardo morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT caiccifederico morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT gasparinifabio morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT griggiofrancesca morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT satoatsuko morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT stachthomas morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT kaulstrehlowsabrina morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT gissicarmela morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies AT mannilucia morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies |