Cargando…

Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species

The cosmopolitan ascidian Ciona intestinalis is the most common model species of Tunicata, the sister-group of Vertebrata, and widely used in developmental biology, genomics and evolutionary studies. Recently, molecular studies suggested the presence of cryptic species hidden within the C. intestina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pennati, Roberta, Ficetola, Gentile Francesco, Brunetti, Riccardo, Caicci, Federico, Gasparini, Fabio, Griggio, Francesca, Sato, Atsuko, Stach, Thomas, Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina, Gissi, Carmela, Manni, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122879
_version_ 1782370499294134272
author Pennati, Roberta
Ficetola, Gentile Francesco
Brunetti, Riccardo
Caicci, Federico
Gasparini, Fabio
Griggio, Francesca
Sato, Atsuko
Stach, Thomas
Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina
Gissi, Carmela
Manni, Lucia
author_facet Pennati, Roberta
Ficetola, Gentile Francesco
Brunetti, Riccardo
Caicci, Federico
Gasparini, Fabio
Griggio, Francesca
Sato, Atsuko
Stach, Thomas
Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina
Gissi, Carmela
Manni, Lucia
author_sort Pennati, Roberta
collection PubMed
description The cosmopolitan ascidian Ciona intestinalis is the most common model species of Tunicata, the sister-group of Vertebrata, and widely used in developmental biology, genomics and evolutionary studies. Recently, molecular studies suggested the presence of cryptic species hidden within the C. intestinalis species, namely C. intestinalis type A and type B. So far, no substantial morphological differences have been identified between individuals belonging to the two types. Here we present morphometric, immunohistochemical, and histological analyses, as well as 3-D reconstructions, of late larvae obtained by cross-fertilization experiments of molecularly determined type A and type B adults, sampled in different seasons and in four different localities. Our data point to quantitative and qualitative differences in the trunk shape of larvae belonging to the two types. In particular, type B larvae exhibit a longer pre-oral lobe, longer and relatively narrower total body length, and a shorter ocellus-tail distance than type A larvae. All these differences were found to be statistically significant in a Discriminant Analysis. Depending on the number of analyzed parameters, the obtained discriminant function was able to correctly classify > 93% of the larvae, with the remaining misclassified larvae attributable to the existence of intra-type seasonal variability. No larval differences were observed at the level of histology and immunohistochemical localization of peripheral sensory neurons. We conclude that type A and type B are two distinct species that can be distinguished on the basis of larval morphology and molecular data. Since the identified larval differences appear to be valid diagnostic characters, we suggest to raise both types to the rank of species and to assign them distinct names.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4425531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44255312015-05-21 Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species Pennati, Roberta Ficetola, Gentile Francesco Brunetti, Riccardo Caicci, Federico Gasparini, Fabio Griggio, Francesca Sato, Atsuko Stach, Thomas Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina Gissi, Carmela Manni, Lucia PLoS One Research Article The cosmopolitan ascidian Ciona intestinalis is the most common model species of Tunicata, the sister-group of Vertebrata, and widely used in developmental biology, genomics and evolutionary studies. Recently, molecular studies suggested the presence of cryptic species hidden within the C. intestinalis species, namely C. intestinalis type A and type B. So far, no substantial morphological differences have been identified between individuals belonging to the two types. Here we present morphometric, immunohistochemical, and histological analyses, as well as 3-D reconstructions, of late larvae obtained by cross-fertilization experiments of molecularly determined type A and type B adults, sampled in different seasons and in four different localities. Our data point to quantitative and qualitative differences in the trunk shape of larvae belonging to the two types. In particular, type B larvae exhibit a longer pre-oral lobe, longer and relatively narrower total body length, and a shorter ocellus-tail distance than type A larvae. All these differences were found to be statistically significant in a Discriminant Analysis. Depending on the number of analyzed parameters, the obtained discriminant function was able to correctly classify > 93% of the larvae, with the remaining misclassified larvae attributable to the existence of intra-type seasonal variability. No larval differences were observed at the level of histology and immunohistochemical localization of peripheral sensory neurons. We conclude that type A and type B are two distinct species that can be distinguished on the basis of larval morphology and molecular data. Since the identified larval differences appear to be valid diagnostic characters, we suggest to raise both types to the rank of species and to assign them distinct names. Public Library of Science 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4425531/ /pubmed/25955391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122879 Text en © 2015 Pennati et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pennati, Roberta
Ficetola, Gentile Francesco
Brunetti, Riccardo
Caicci, Federico
Gasparini, Fabio
Griggio, Francesca
Sato, Atsuko
Stach, Thomas
Kaul-Strehlow, Sabrina
Gissi, Carmela
Manni, Lucia
Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species
title Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species
title_full Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species
title_fullStr Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species
title_full_unstemmed Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species
title_short Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species
title_sort morphological differences between larvae of the ciona intestinalis species complex: hints for a valid taxonomic definition of distinct species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122879
work_keys_str_mv AT pennatiroberta morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT ficetolagentilefrancesco morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT brunettiriccardo morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT caiccifederico morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT gasparinifabio morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT griggiofrancesca morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT satoatsuko morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT stachthomas morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT kaulstrehlowsabrina morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT gissicarmela morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies
AT mannilucia morphologicaldifferencesbetweenlarvaeofthecionaintestinalisspeciescomplexhintsforavalidtaxonomicdefinitionofdistinctspecies