Cargando…

“An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?

OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ concepts of stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and how they think stiffness should be measured. METHODS: Eight focus groups were held at three centres involving 50 patients with current/previous PMR. Each group had at least one facilitator and one rapporteur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackie, Sarah Louise, Hughes, Rodney, Walsh, Margaret, Day, John, Newton, Marion, Pease, Colin, Kirwan, John, Morris, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126758
_version_ 1782370499765993472
author Mackie, Sarah Louise
Hughes, Rodney
Walsh, Margaret
Day, John
Newton, Marion
Pease, Colin
Kirwan, John
Morris, Marianne
author_facet Mackie, Sarah Louise
Hughes, Rodney
Walsh, Margaret
Day, John
Newton, Marion
Pease, Colin
Kirwan, John
Morris, Marianne
author_sort Mackie, Sarah Louise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ concepts of stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and how they think stiffness should be measured. METHODS: Eight focus groups were held at three centres involving 50 patients with current/previous PMR. Each group had at least one facilitator and one rapporteur making field notes. An interview schedule was used to stimulate discussion. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Major themes identified were: symptoms: pain, stiffness and fatigue; functional impact; impact on daily schedule; and approaches to measurement. The common subtheme for the experience of stiffness was “difficulty in moving”, and usually considered as distinct from the experience of pain, albeit with a variable overlap. Some participants felt stiffness was the “overwhelming” symptom, in that it prevented them carrying out “fundamental activities” and “generally living life”. Diurnal variation in stiffness was generally described in relation to the daily schedule but was not the same as stiffness severity. Some participants suggested measuring stiffness using a numeric rating scale or a Likert scale, while others felt that it was more relevant and straightforward to measure difficulty in performing everyday activities rather than about stiffness itself. CONCLUSIONS: A conceptual model of stiffness in PMR is presented where stiffness is an important part of the patient experience and impacts on their ability to live their lives. Stiffness is closely related to function and often regarded as interchangeable with pain. From the patients’ perspective, visual analogue scales measuring pain and stiffness were not the most useful method for reporting stiffness; participants preferred numerical rating scales, or assessments of function to reflect how stiffness impacts on their daily lives. Assessing function may be a pragmatic solution to difficulties in quantifying stiffness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4425533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44255332015-05-21 “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? Mackie, Sarah Louise Hughes, Rodney Walsh, Margaret Day, John Newton, Marion Pease, Colin Kirwan, John Morris, Marianne PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ concepts of stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and how they think stiffness should be measured. METHODS: Eight focus groups were held at three centres involving 50 patients with current/previous PMR. Each group had at least one facilitator and one rapporteur making field notes. An interview schedule was used to stimulate discussion. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Major themes identified were: symptoms: pain, stiffness and fatigue; functional impact; impact on daily schedule; and approaches to measurement. The common subtheme for the experience of stiffness was “difficulty in moving”, and usually considered as distinct from the experience of pain, albeit with a variable overlap. Some participants felt stiffness was the “overwhelming” symptom, in that it prevented them carrying out “fundamental activities” and “generally living life”. Diurnal variation in stiffness was generally described in relation to the daily schedule but was not the same as stiffness severity. Some participants suggested measuring stiffness using a numeric rating scale or a Likert scale, while others felt that it was more relevant and straightforward to measure difficulty in performing everyday activities rather than about stiffness itself. CONCLUSIONS: A conceptual model of stiffness in PMR is presented where stiffness is an important part of the patient experience and impacts on their ability to live their lives. Stiffness is closely related to function and often regarded as interchangeable with pain. From the patients’ perspective, visual analogue scales measuring pain and stiffness were not the most useful method for reporting stiffness; participants preferred numerical rating scales, or assessments of function to reflect how stiffness impacts on their daily lives. Assessing function may be a pragmatic solution to difficulties in quantifying stiffness. Public Library of Science 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4425533/ /pubmed/25955770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126758 Text en © 2015 Mackie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mackie, Sarah Louise
Hughes, Rodney
Walsh, Margaret
Day, John
Newton, Marion
Pease, Colin
Kirwan, John
Morris, Marianne
“An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?
title “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?
title_full “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?
title_fullStr “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?
title_full_unstemmed “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?
title_short “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?
title_sort “an impediment to living life”: why and how should we measure stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126758
work_keys_str_mv AT mackiesarahlouise animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica
AT hughesrodney animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica
AT walshmargaret animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica
AT dayjohn animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica
AT newtonmarion animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica
AT peasecolin animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica
AT kirwanjohn animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica
AT morrismarianne animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica