Cargando…
“An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica?
OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ concepts of stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and how they think stiffness should be measured. METHODS: Eight focus groups were held at three centres involving 50 patients with current/previous PMR. Each group had at least one facilitator and one rapporteur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126758 |
_version_ | 1782370499765993472 |
---|---|
author | Mackie, Sarah Louise Hughes, Rodney Walsh, Margaret Day, John Newton, Marion Pease, Colin Kirwan, John Morris, Marianne |
author_facet | Mackie, Sarah Louise Hughes, Rodney Walsh, Margaret Day, John Newton, Marion Pease, Colin Kirwan, John Morris, Marianne |
author_sort | Mackie, Sarah Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ concepts of stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and how they think stiffness should be measured. METHODS: Eight focus groups were held at three centres involving 50 patients with current/previous PMR. Each group had at least one facilitator and one rapporteur making field notes. An interview schedule was used to stimulate discussion. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Major themes identified were: symptoms: pain, stiffness and fatigue; functional impact; impact on daily schedule; and approaches to measurement. The common subtheme for the experience of stiffness was “difficulty in moving”, and usually considered as distinct from the experience of pain, albeit with a variable overlap. Some participants felt stiffness was the “overwhelming” symptom, in that it prevented them carrying out “fundamental activities” and “generally living life”. Diurnal variation in stiffness was generally described in relation to the daily schedule but was not the same as stiffness severity. Some participants suggested measuring stiffness using a numeric rating scale or a Likert scale, while others felt that it was more relevant and straightforward to measure difficulty in performing everyday activities rather than about stiffness itself. CONCLUSIONS: A conceptual model of stiffness in PMR is presented where stiffness is an important part of the patient experience and impacts on their ability to live their lives. Stiffness is closely related to function and often regarded as interchangeable with pain. From the patients’ perspective, visual analogue scales measuring pain and stiffness were not the most useful method for reporting stiffness; participants preferred numerical rating scales, or assessments of function to reflect how stiffness impacts on their daily lives. Assessing function may be a pragmatic solution to difficulties in quantifying stiffness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4425533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44255332015-05-21 “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? Mackie, Sarah Louise Hughes, Rodney Walsh, Margaret Day, John Newton, Marion Pease, Colin Kirwan, John Morris, Marianne PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ concepts of stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and how they think stiffness should be measured. METHODS: Eight focus groups were held at three centres involving 50 patients with current/previous PMR. Each group had at least one facilitator and one rapporteur making field notes. An interview schedule was used to stimulate discussion. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Major themes identified were: symptoms: pain, stiffness and fatigue; functional impact; impact on daily schedule; and approaches to measurement. The common subtheme for the experience of stiffness was “difficulty in moving”, and usually considered as distinct from the experience of pain, albeit with a variable overlap. Some participants felt stiffness was the “overwhelming” symptom, in that it prevented them carrying out “fundamental activities” and “generally living life”. Diurnal variation in stiffness was generally described in relation to the daily schedule but was not the same as stiffness severity. Some participants suggested measuring stiffness using a numeric rating scale or a Likert scale, while others felt that it was more relevant and straightforward to measure difficulty in performing everyday activities rather than about stiffness itself. CONCLUSIONS: A conceptual model of stiffness in PMR is presented where stiffness is an important part of the patient experience and impacts on their ability to live their lives. Stiffness is closely related to function and often regarded as interchangeable with pain. From the patients’ perspective, visual analogue scales measuring pain and stiffness were not the most useful method for reporting stiffness; participants preferred numerical rating scales, or assessments of function to reflect how stiffness impacts on their daily lives. Assessing function may be a pragmatic solution to difficulties in quantifying stiffness. Public Library of Science 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4425533/ /pubmed/25955770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126758 Text en © 2015 Mackie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mackie, Sarah Louise Hughes, Rodney Walsh, Margaret Day, John Newton, Marion Pease, Colin Kirwan, John Morris, Marianne “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? |
title | “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? |
title_full | “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? |
title_fullStr | “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? |
title_full_unstemmed | “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? |
title_short | “An Impediment to Living Life”: Why and How Should We Measure Stiffness in Polymyalgia Rheumatica? |
title_sort | “an impediment to living life”: why and how should we measure stiffness in polymyalgia rheumatica? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25955770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mackiesarahlouise animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica AT hughesrodney animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica AT walshmargaret animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica AT dayjohn animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica AT newtonmarion animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica AT peasecolin animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica AT kirwanjohn animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica AT morrismarianne animpedimenttolivinglifewhyandhowshouldwemeasurestiffnessinpolymyalgiarheumatica |