Cargando…
Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk
One of the most widely applicable benefits of aggregation is a per capita reduction in predation risk. Many factors can contribute to this but, for moving groups, an increased difficulty in tracking and targeting one individual amongst many has received particular attention. This “confusion effect”...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1885-1 |
_version_ | 1782370525855612928 |
---|---|
author | Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E. Holmes, Gavin Baddeley, Roland Cuthill, Innes C. |
author_facet | Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E. Holmes, Gavin Baddeley, Roland Cuthill, Innes C. |
author_sort | Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the most widely applicable benefits of aggregation is a per capita reduction in predation risk. Many factors can contribute to this but, for moving groups, an increased difficulty in tracking and targeting one individual amongst many has received particular attention. This “confusion effect” has been proposed to result from a bottleneck in information processing, a hypothesis supported by both modelling and experiment. If the competition for limited attention is localised to the particular part of the visual field where the target is located, prey density is likely to be the key factor rather than group numbers per se. Furthermore, unpredictability of prey movement may enhance confusion, but both factors have received insufficient attention from empiricists: undoubtedly because of the difficulty of experimental manipulation in natural systems. We used a computer-based target tracking task with human subjects to manipulate effects of number and density independently, in factorial combination with motion path predictability. Density, rather than number, drove the confusion effect in our experiment and acted synergistically with the unpredictability of the direction of motion. The experimental paradigm we present offers the potential for isolating other factors affecting predation success on group-living prey, and forging links with the psychological literature on object tracking and visual search. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4425808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44258082015-05-13 Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E. Holmes, Gavin Baddeley, Roland Cuthill, Innes C. Behav Ecol Sociobiol Original Paper One of the most widely applicable benefits of aggregation is a per capita reduction in predation risk. Many factors can contribute to this but, for moving groups, an increased difficulty in tracking and targeting one individual amongst many has received particular attention. This “confusion effect” has been proposed to result from a bottleneck in information processing, a hypothesis supported by both modelling and experiment. If the competition for limited attention is localised to the particular part of the visual field where the target is located, prey density is likely to be the key factor rather than group numbers per se. Furthermore, unpredictability of prey movement may enhance confusion, but both factors have received insufficient attention from empiricists: undoubtedly because of the difficulty of experimental manipulation in natural systems. We used a computer-based target tracking task with human subjects to manipulate effects of number and density independently, in factorial combination with motion path predictability. Density, rather than number, drove the confusion effect in our experiment and acted synergistically with the unpredictability of the direction of motion. The experimental paradigm we present offers the potential for isolating other factors affecting predation success on group-living prey, and forging links with the psychological literature on object tracking and visual search. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-02-24 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4425808/ /pubmed/25983380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1885-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E. Holmes, Gavin Baddeley, Roland Cuthill, Innes C. Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk |
title | Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk |
title_full | Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk |
title_fullStr | Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk |
title_short | Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk |
title_sort | moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1885-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottsamuelnicholase movingingroupshowdensityandunpredictablemotionaffectpredationrisk AT holmesgavin movingingroupshowdensityandunpredictablemotionaffectpredationrisk AT baddeleyroland movingingroupshowdensityandunpredictablemotionaffectpredationrisk AT cuthillinnesc movingingroupshowdensityandunpredictablemotionaffectpredationrisk |