Cargando…

Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors

INTRODUCTION: Advances in tendon engineering with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are hindered by a need for cues to direct tenogenesis, and markers to assess tenogenic state. We examined the effects of factors involved in embryonic tendon development on adult MSCs, and compared MSC responses to that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Jeffrey P, Galassi, Thomas V, Stoppato, Matteo, Schiele, Nathan R, Kuo, Catherine K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0043-z
_version_ 1782370545348640768
author Brown, Jeffrey P
Galassi, Thomas V
Stoppato, Matteo
Schiele, Nathan R
Kuo, Catherine K
author_facet Brown, Jeffrey P
Galassi, Thomas V
Stoppato, Matteo
Schiele, Nathan R
Kuo, Catherine K
author_sort Brown, Jeffrey P
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Advances in tendon engineering with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are hindered by a need for cues to direct tenogenesis, and markers to assess tenogenic state. We examined the effects of factors involved in embryonic tendon development on adult MSCs, and compared MSC responses to that of embryonic tendon progenitor cells (TPCs), a model system of tenogenically differentiating cells. METHODS: Murine MSCs and TPCs subjected to cyclic tensile loading, transforming growth factor-β2 (TGFβ2), and fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF4) in vitro were assessed for proliferation and mRNA levels of scleraxis, TGFβ2, tenomodulin, collagen type I and elastin. RESULTS: Before treatment, scleraxis and elastin levels in MSCs were lower than in TPCs, while other tendon markers expressed at similar levels in MSCs as TPCs. TGFβ2 alone and combined with loading were tenogenic based on increased scleraxis levels in both MSCs and TPCs. Loading alone had minimal effect. FGF4 downregulated tendon marker levels in MSCs but not in TPCs. Select tendon markers were not consistently upregulated with scleraxis, demonstrating the importance of characterizing a profile of markers. CONCLUSIONS: Similar responses as TPCs to specific treatments suggest MSCs have tenogenic potential. Potentially shared mechanisms of cell function between MSCs and TPCs should be investigated in longer term studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4425922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44259222015-05-10 Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors Brown, Jeffrey P Galassi, Thomas V Stoppato, Matteo Schiele, Nathan R Kuo, Catherine K Stem Cell Res Ther Research INTRODUCTION: Advances in tendon engineering with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are hindered by a need for cues to direct tenogenesis, and markers to assess tenogenic state. We examined the effects of factors involved in embryonic tendon development on adult MSCs, and compared MSC responses to that of embryonic tendon progenitor cells (TPCs), a model system of tenogenically differentiating cells. METHODS: Murine MSCs and TPCs subjected to cyclic tensile loading, transforming growth factor-β2 (TGFβ2), and fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF4) in vitro were assessed for proliferation and mRNA levels of scleraxis, TGFβ2, tenomodulin, collagen type I and elastin. RESULTS: Before treatment, scleraxis and elastin levels in MSCs were lower than in TPCs, while other tendon markers expressed at similar levels in MSCs as TPCs. TGFβ2 alone and combined with loading were tenogenic based on increased scleraxis levels in both MSCs and TPCs. Loading alone had minimal effect. FGF4 downregulated tendon marker levels in MSCs but not in TPCs. Select tendon markers were not consistently upregulated with scleraxis, demonstrating the importance of characterizing a profile of markers. CONCLUSIONS: Similar responses as TPCs to specific treatments suggest MSCs have tenogenic potential. Potentially shared mechanisms of cell function between MSCs and TPCs should be investigated in longer term studies. BioMed Central 2015-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4425922/ /pubmed/25956970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0043-z Text en © Brown et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Brown, Jeffrey P
Galassi, Thomas V
Stoppato, Matteo
Schiele, Nathan R
Kuo, Catherine K
Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors
title Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors
title_full Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors
title_short Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors
title_sort comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell and embryonic tendon progenitor cell response to embryonic tendon biochemical and mechanical factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4425922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0043-z
work_keys_str_mv AT brownjeffreyp comparativeanalysisofmesenchymalstemcellandembryonictendonprogenitorcellresponsetoembryonictendonbiochemicalandmechanicalfactors
AT galassithomasv comparativeanalysisofmesenchymalstemcellandembryonictendonprogenitorcellresponsetoembryonictendonbiochemicalandmechanicalfactors
AT stoppatomatteo comparativeanalysisofmesenchymalstemcellandembryonictendonprogenitorcellresponsetoembryonictendonbiochemicalandmechanicalfactors
AT schielenathanr comparativeanalysisofmesenchymalstemcellandembryonictendonprogenitorcellresponsetoembryonictendonbiochemicalandmechanicalfactors
AT kuocatherinek comparativeanalysisofmesenchymalstemcellandembryonictendonprogenitorcellresponsetoembryonictendonbiochemicalandmechanicalfactors