Cargando…

Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the aims, methods, donor and recipient cohort characteristics, and potential impact of the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS). METHODS: The CPTS is a randomized clinical trial conducted at 40 clinical sites (70 surgeons) designed to assess the effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lass, Jonathan H., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Ayala, Allison R., Benetz, Beth A., Gal, Robin L., Aldave, Anthony J., Corrigan, Michelle M., Dunn, Steven P., McCall, Ty L., Pramanik, Sudeep, Rosenwasser, George O., Ross, Kevin W., Terry, Mark A., Verdier, David D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cornea 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25850706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000417
_version_ 1782370558620467200
author Lass, Jonathan H.
Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B.
Ayala, Allison R.
Benetz, Beth A.
Gal, Robin L.
Aldave, Anthony J.
Corrigan, Michelle M.
Dunn, Steven P.
McCall, Ty L.
Pramanik, Sudeep
Rosenwasser, George O.
Ross, Kevin W.
Terry, Mark A.
Verdier, David D.
author_facet Lass, Jonathan H.
Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B.
Ayala, Allison R.
Benetz, Beth A.
Gal, Robin L.
Aldave, Anthony J.
Corrigan, Michelle M.
Dunn, Steven P.
McCall, Ty L.
Pramanik, Sudeep
Rosenwasser, George O.
Ross, Kevin W.
Terry, Mark A.
Verdier, David D.
author_sort Lass, Jonathan H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the aims, methods, donor and recipient cohort characteristics, and potential impact of the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS). METHODS: The CPTS is a randomized clinical trial conducted at 40 clinical sites (70 surgeons) designed to assess the effect of donor cornea preservation time (PT) on graft survival 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Eyes undergoing surgery for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema were randomized to receive donor corneas stored ≤7 days or 8 to 14 days. Donor and patient characteristics, tissue preparation and surgical parameters, recipient and donor corneal stroma clarity, central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, complications, and a reading center-determined central endothelial cell density were collected. Surveys were conducted to evaluate pre-CPTS PT practices. RESULTS: The 1330 CPTS donors were: 49% >60 years old, 27% diabetic, had a median eye bank–determined screening endothelial cell density of 2688 cells/mm(2), and 74% eye bank prepared for DSAEK. A total of 1090 recipients (1330 eyes including 240 bilateral cases) had: median age of 70 years, were 60% female, 90% white, 18% diabetic, 52% phakic, and 94% had Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Before the CPTS, 19 eye banks provided PT data on 20,852 corneas domestically placed for DSAEK in 2010 to 2011; 96% were preserved ≤7 days. Of 305 American Academy of Ophthalmology members responding to a pre-CPTS survey, 233 (76%) set their maximum PT preference at 8 days or less. CONCLUSIONS: The CPTS will increase understanding of factors related to DSAEK success and, if noninferiority of longer PT is shown, will have great potential to extend the available pool of endothelial keratoplasty donors. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01537393.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4426012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cornea
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44260122015-05-15 Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States Lass, Jonathan H. Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B. Ayala, Allison R. Benetz, Beth A. Gal, Robin L. Aldave, Anthony J. Corrigan, Michelle M. Dunn, Steven P. McCall, Ty L. Pramanik, Sudeep Rosenwasser, George O. Ross, Kevin W. Terry, Mark A. Verdier, David D. Cornea Clinical Science PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the aims, methods, donor and recipient cohort characteristics, and potential impact of the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS). METHODS: The CPTS is a randomized clinical trial conducted at 40 clinical sites (70 surgeons) designed to assess the effect of donor cornea preservation time (PT) on graft survival 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Eyes undergoing surgery for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema were randomized to receive donor corneas stored ≤7 days or 8 to 14 days. Donor and patient characteristics, tissue preparation and surgical parameters, recipient and donor corneal stroma clarity, central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, complications, and a reading center-determined central endothelial cell density were collected. Surveys were conducted to evaluate pre-CPTS PT practices. RESULTS: The 1330 CPTS donors were: 49% >60 years old, 27% diabetic, had a median eye bank–determined screening endothelial cell density of 2688 cells/mm(2), and 74% eye bank prepared for DSAEK. A total of 1090 recipients (1330 eyes including 240 bilateral cases) had: median age of 70 years, were 60% female, 90% white, 18% diabetic, 52% phakic, and 94% had Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Before the CPTS, 19 eye banks provided PT data on 20,852 corneas domestically placed for DSAEK in 2010 to 2011; 96% were preserved ≤7 days. Of 305 American Academy of Ophthalmology members responding to a pre-CPTS survey, 233 (76%) set their maximum PT preference at 8 days or less. CONCLUSIONS: The CPTS will increase understanding of factors related to DSAEK success and, if noninferiority of longer PT is shown, will have great potential to extend the available pool of endothelial keratoplasty donors. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01537393. Cornea 2015-04-07 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4426012/ /pubmed/25850706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000417 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Lass, Jonathan H.
Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B.
Ayala, Allison R.
Benetz, Beth A.
Gal, Robin L.
Aldave, Anthony J.
Corrigan, Michelle M.
Dunn, Steven P.
McCall, Ty L.
Pramanik, Sudeep
Rosenwasser, George O.
Ross, Kevin W.
Terry, Mark A.
Verdier, David D.
Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States
title Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States
title_full Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States
title_fullStr Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States
title_short Cornea Preservation Time Study: Methods and Potential Impact on the Cornea Donor Pool in the United States
title_sort cornea preservation time study: methods and potential impact on the cornea donor pool in the united states
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25850706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000417
work_keys_str_mv AT lassjonathanh corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT szczotkaflynnlorettab corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT ayalaallisonr corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT benetzbetha corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT galrobinl corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT aldaveanthonyj corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT corriganmichellem corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT dunnstevenp corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT mccalltyl corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT pramaniksudeep corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT rosenwassergeorgeo corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT rosskevinw corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT terrymarka corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT verdierdavidd corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates
AT corneapreservationtimestudymethodsandpotentialimpactonthecorneadonorpoolintheunitedstates