Cargando…

IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens

BACKGROUND: As sharing and secondary research use of biospecimens increases, IRBs and researchers face the challenge of protecting and respecting donors without comprehensive regulations addressing the human subject protection issues posed by biobanking. Variation in IRB biobanking policies about th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Goldenberg, Aaron J, Maschke, Karen J, Joffe, Steven, Botkin, Jeffrey R, Rothwell, Erin, Murray, Thomas H, Anderson, Rebecca, Deming, Nicole, Rosenthal, Beth F, Rivera, Suzanne M
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2015
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0020-1

Ejemplares similares

How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2011)

The SMART IRB platform: A national resource for IRB review for multisite studies
por: Cobb, Nichelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

4186 Single IRB and the CTSI: Liaison Model for the IRB Reliance Process
por: Caldwell, Christine Sego, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using single IRB consultations to meet the educational needs of investigative teams
por: Johnson, Ann R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Dairis Rihards Irbe
por: Irbe, Dairis Rihards
Publicado: (2023)

Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers’ experiences and perceptions
por: Liu, Xing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of SmartIRB Does Not Reduce IRB Review Time in a Non-federally Funded, Multi-Site Malnutrition Study
por: Lamers-Johnson, Erin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Secondary research uses of residual newborn screening dried bloodspots: a scoping review
por: Rothwell, Erin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Principal Investigator Views of the IRB System
por: Whitney, Simon N., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The IRB Reliance Exchange (IREx): A national web-based platform for operationalizing single IRB review
por: Serdoz, Emily Sheffer, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens
por: Beskow, Laura M.
Publicado: (2016)

The IRB structure and medical research reform
por: Babyar, Julie
Publicado: (2018)

Secondary consent to biospecimen use in a prostate cancer biorepository
por: Drake, Bettina F., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The Ethics Police?: IRBs' Views Concerning Their Power
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2011)

IRB Process Improvements: A Machine Learning Analysis
por: Shoenbill, Kimberly, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A snapshot of U.S. IRB review of COVID-19 research in the early pandemic
por: Taylor, Holly A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Journalists, district attorneys and researchers: why IRBs should get in the middle
por: Chodos, Anna H, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research
por: Kim, Won Oak
Publicado: (2012)

From anonymity to “open doors”: IRB responses to tensions with researchers
por: Klitzman, Robert
Publicado: (2012)

Using Central IRBs for Multicenter Clinical Trials in the United States
por: Flynn, Kathryn E., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

2030: “Understandable to the subject”: Plain language IRB informed consents
por: Moore, Tina, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
por: Moodley, Keymanthri, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Increasing health equity through biospecimen research: Identification of factors that influence willingness of Native Americans to donate biospecimens
por: Sinclair, Ka'imi A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Protocol for Biospecimen Collection and Analysis Within the BACPAC Research Program
por: Fields, Aaron J, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
por: Green, Jonathan M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The biorepository portal toolkit: an honest brokered, modular service oriented software tool set for biospecimen-driven translational research
por: Felmeister, Alex S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Research Ethics Boards: No Data on Quality of For-Profit or Non-Profit IRBs
por: Shamoo, Adil E, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants
por: Gliwa, Catherine, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The impact of central IRB's on informed consent readability and trial adherence in SPRINT
por: Tamariz, Leonardo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Big Data, Biomedical Research, and Ethics Review: New Challenges for IRBs
por: Ferretti, Agata, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cross-cultural validation of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool: Chinese Version
por: Liu, Xing, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Key lessons and strategies for implementing single IRB review in the Trial Innovation Network
por: Johnson, Ann R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Do-it-yourself biospecimens: the benefits of home collection.
por: Barrett, Julia R
Publicado: (2004)

Biospecimens, biobanking and global cancer research collaborations
por: Ragin, Camille, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection
por: Dominianni, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Legal & ethical compliance when sharing biospecimen
por: Klingstrom, Tomas, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Availability of Human Biospecimens to Support Biomarker Research
por: Tarling, Tamsin E., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Opportunities and Challenges in Understanding Atherosclerosis by Human Biospecimen Studies
por: Elishaev, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of a single, independent IRB: Case study of an NIH funded consortium
por: Stoffel, Brandy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Resources to assist in the transition to a single IRB model for multisite clinical trials
por: Hahn, Cynthia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_nu77no0um7pvpbsrubii0b6th3