Cargando…

A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials

BACKGROUND: In early diagnostic trials, particularly in biomarker studies, the aim is often to select diagnostic tests among several methods. In case of metric, discrete, or even ordered categorical data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (denoted by AUC) is an appropr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapf, Antonia, Brunner, Edgar, Konietschke, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0025-y
_version_ 1782370572260343808
author Zapf, Antonia
Brunner, Edgar
Konietschke, Frank
author_facet Zapf, Antonia
Brunner, Edgar
Konietschke, Frank
author_sort Zapf, Antonia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In early diagnostic trials, particularly in biomarker studies, the aim is often to select diagnostic tests among several methods. In case of metric, discrete, or even ordered categorical data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (denoted by AUC) is an appropriate overall accuracy measure for the selection, because the AUC is independent of cut-off points. METHODS: For selection of biomarkers the individual AUC’s are compared with a pre-defined threshold. To keep the overall coverage probability or the multiple type-I error rate, simultaneous confidence intervals and multiple contrast tests are considered. We propose a purely nonparametric approach for the estimation of the AUC’s with the corresponding confidence intervals and statistical tests. This approach uses the correlation among the statistics to account for multiplicity. For small sample sizes, a Wild-Bootstrap approach is presented. It is shown that the corresponding intervals and tests are asymptotically exact. RESULTS: Extensive simulation studies indicate that the derived Wild-Bootstrap approach keeps and exploits the nominal type-I error at best, even for high accuracies and in case of small samples sizes. The strength of the correlation, the type of covariance structure, a skewed distribution, and also a moderate imbalanced case-control ratio do not have any impact on the behavior of the approach. A real data set illustrates the application of the proposed methods. CONCLUSION: We recommend the new Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials, especially for high accuracies and small samples sizes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0025-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4426186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44261862015-05-11 A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials Zapf, Antonia Brunner, Edgar Konietschke, Frank BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In early diagnostic trials, particularly in biomarker studies, the aim is often to select diagnostic tests among several methods. In case of metric, discrete, or even ordered categorical data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (denoted by AUC) is an appropriate overall accuracy measure for the selection, because the AUC is independent of cut-off points. METHODS: For selection of biomarkers the individual AUC’s are compared with a pre-defined threshold. To keep the overall coverage probability or the multiple type-I error rate, simultaneous confidence intervals and multiple contrast tests are considered. We propose a purely nonparametric approach for the estimation of the AUC’s with the corresponding confidence intervals and statistical tests. This approach uses the correlation among the statistics to account for multiplicity. For small sample sizes, a Wild-Bootstrap approach is presented. It is shown that the corresponding intervals and tests are asymptotically exact. RESULTS: Extensive simulation studies indicate that the derived Wild-Bootstrap approach keeps and exploits the nominal type-I error at best, even for high accuracies and in case of small samples sizes. The strength of the correlation, the type of covariance structure, a skewed distribution, and also a moderate imbalanced case-control ratio do not have any impact on the behavior of the approach. A real data set illustrates the application of the proposed methods. CONCLUSION: We recommend the new Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials, especially for high accuracies and small samples sizes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0025-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4426186/ /pubmed/25925052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0025-y Text en © Zapf et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zapf, Antonia
Brunner, Edgar
Konietschke, Frank
A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials
title A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials
title_full A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials
title_fullStr A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials
title_full_unstemmed A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials
title_short A Wild Bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials
title_sort wild bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0025-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zapfantonia awildbootstrapapproachfortheselectionofbiomarkersinearlydiagnostictrials
AT brunneredgar awildbootstrapapproachfortheselectionofbiomarkersinearlydiagnostictrials
AT konietschkefrank awildbootstrapapproachfortheselectionofbiomarkersinearlydiagnostictrials
AT zapfantonia wildbootstrapapproachfortheselectionofbiomarkersinearlydiagnostictrials
AT brunneredgar wildbootstrapapproachfortheselectionofbiomarkersinearlydiagnostictrials
AT konietschkefrank wildbootstrapapproachfortheselectionofbiomarkersinearlydiagnostictrials