Cargando…
Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status
Metagenomic analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA has been used to profile microbial communities at high resolution, and to examine their association with host diet or diseases. We examined the oral and gut microbiome composition of two captive koalas to determine whether bacterial communities are unusual i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25960327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10189 |
_version_ | 1782370620900638720 |
---|---|
author | Alfano, Niccoló Courtiol, Alexandre Vielgrader, Hanna Timms, Peter Roca, Alfred L. Greenwood, Alex D. |
author_facet | Alfano, Niccoló Courtiol, Alexandre Vielgrader, Hanna Timms, Peter Roca, Alfred L. Greenwood, Alex D. |
author_sort | Alfano, Niccoló |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metagenomic analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA has been used to profile microbial communities at high resolution, and to examine their association with host diet or diseases. We examined the oral and gut microbiome composition of two captive koalas to determine whether bacterial communities are unusual in this species, given that their diet consists almost exclusively of Eucalyptus leaves. Despite a highly specialized diet, koala oral and gut microbiomes were similar in composition to the microbiomes from the same body regions of other mammals. Rectal swabs contained all of the diversity present in faecal samples, along with additional taxa, suggesting that faecal bacterial communities may merely subsample the gut bacterial diversity. Furthermore, the faecal microbiomes of the captive koalas were similar to those reported for wild koalas, suggesting that captivity may not compromise koala microbial health. Since koalas frequently suffer from ocular diseases caused by Chlamydia infection, we also examined the eye microbiome composition of two captive koalas, establishing the healthy baseline for this body part. The eye microbial community was very diverse, similar to other mammalian ocular microbiomes but with an unusually high representation of bacteria from the family Phyllobacteriaceae. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4426690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44266902015-05-21 Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status Alfano, Niccoló Courtiol, Alexandre Vielgrader, Hanna Timms, Peter Roca, Alfred L. Greenwood, Alex D. Sci Rep Article Metagenomic analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA has been used to profile microbial communities at high resolution, and to examine their association with host diet or diseases. We examined the oral and gut microbiome composition of two captive koalas to determine whether bacterial communities are unusual in this species, given that their diet consists almost exclusively of Eucalyptus leaves. Despite a highly specialized diet, koala oral and gut microbiomes were similar in composition to the microbiomes from the same body regions of other mammals. Rectal swabs contained all of the diversity present in faecal samples, along with additional taxa, suggesting that faecal bacterial communities may merely subsample the gut bacterial diversity. Furthermore, the faecal microbiomes of the captive koalas were similar to those reported for wild koalas, suggesting that captivity may not compromise koala microbial health. Since koalas frequently suffer from ocular diseases caused by Chlamydia infection, we also examined the eye microbiome composition of two captive koalas, establishing the healthy baseline for this body part. The eye microbial community was very diverse, similar to other mammalian ocular microbiomes but with an unusually high representation of bacteria from the family Phyllobacteriaceae. Nature Publishing Group 2015-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4426690/ /pubmed/25960327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10189 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Alfano, Niccoló Courtiol, Alexandre Vielgrader, Hanna Timms, Peter Roca, Alfred L. Greenwood, Alex D. Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status |
title | Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status |
title_full | Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status |
title_fullStr | Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status |
title_short | Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status |
title_sort | variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25960327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alfanoniccolo variationinkoalamicrobiomeswithinandbetweenindividualseffectofbodyregionandcaptivitystatus AT courtiolalexandre variationinkoalamicrobiomeswithinandbetweenindividualseffectofbodyregionandcaptivitystatus AT vielgraderhanna variationinkoalamicrobiomeswithinandbetweenindividualseffectofbodyregionandcaptivitystatus AT timmspeter variationinkoalamicrobiomeswithinandbetweenindividualseffectofbodyregionandcaptivitystatus AT rocaalfredl variationinkoalamicrobiomeswithinandbetweenindividualseffectofbodyregionandcaptivitystatus AT greenwoodalexd variationinkoalamicrobiomeswithinandbetweenindividualseffectofbodyregionandcaptivitystatus |