Cargando…
Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases were searched until January 2013. The study included randomized controlled trials that the effectiveness of acupuncture alone was compared to anti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7 |
_version_ | 1782370635678220288 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Changhe Ji, Kangshou Cao, Huijuan Wang, Ying Jin, Hwang Hye Zhang, Zhe Yang, Guanlin |
author_facet | Yu, Changhe Ji, Kangshou Cao, Huijuan Wang, Ying Jin, Hwang Hye Zhang, Zhe Yang, Guanlin |
author_sort | Yu, Changhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases were searched until January 2013. The study included randomized controlled trials that the effectiveness of acupuncture alone was compared to anti-angina medicines (in addition to conventional treatment) and the effectiveness of a combination of acupuncture plus anti-angina medicines was compared to anti-angina medicines alone. The trial selection, data extraction, quality assessment and data analytic procedures outlined in the 2011 Cochrane Handbook were involved. RESULTS: The study included 25 randomized controlled trials (involving 2,058 patients) that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed that the number of patients with ineffectiveness of angina relief was less in the combined acupuncture-anti-angina treatment group than in the anti-angina medicines alone group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Similarly, compared to the anti-angina medicines alone group, fewer patients in the combined treatment group showed no ECG improvement (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40-0.62, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). However, no differences were observed between acupuncture treatment alone and anti-angina medicines alone for both outcome measures. Only four trials mentioned adverse effects. One trial found no significant difference between acupuncture and Chinese medicine, and three reported no adverse events. The quality of the trials was found to be low. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed very low evidence to support the use of acupuncture for improving angina symptoms and ECG of angina patients. However, the quality of the trials included in this study was low. Large and rigorously designed trials are needed to confirm the potential benefit and adverse events of acupuncture. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4426772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44267722015-05-12 Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Yu, Changhe Ji, Kangshou Cao, Huijuan Wang, Ying Jin, Hwang Hye Zhang, Zhe Yang, Guanlin BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases were searched until January 2013. The study included randomized controlled trials that the effectiveness of acupuncture alone was compared to anti-angina medicines (in addition to conventional treatment) and the effectiveness of a combination of acupuncture plus anti-angina medicines was compared to anti-angina medicines alone. The trial selection, data extraction, quality assessment and data analytic procedures outlined in the 2011 Cochrane Handbook were involved. RESULTS: The study included 25 randomized controlled trials (involving 2,058 patients) that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed that the number of patients with ineffectiveness of angina relief was less in the combined acupuncture-anti-angina treatment group than in the anti-angina medicines alone group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Similarly, compared to the anti-angina medicines alone group, fewer patients in the combined treatment group showed no ECG improvement (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40-0.62, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). However, no differences were observed between acupuncture treatment alone and anti-angina medicines alone for both outcome measures. Only four trials mentioned adverse effects. One trial found no significant difference between acupuncture and Chinese medicine, and three reported no adverse events. The quality of the trials was found to be low. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed very low evidence to support the use of acupuncture for improving angina symptoms and ECG of angina patients. However, the quality of the trials included in this study was low. Large and rigorously designed trials are needed to confirm the potential benefit and adverse events of acupuncture. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4426772/ /pubmed/25888363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7 Text en © Yu et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yu, Changhe Ji, Kangshou Cao, Huijuan Wang, Ying Jin, Hwang Hye Zhang, Zhe Yang, Guanlin Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title | Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuchanghe effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jikangshou effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT caohuijuan effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangying effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jinhwanghye effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangzhe effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yangguanlin effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |