Cargando…

Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases were searched until January 2013. The study included randomized controlled trials that the effectiveness of acupuncture alone was compared to anti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Changhe, Ji, Kangshou, Cao, Huijuan, Wang, Ying, Jin, Hwang Hye, Zhang, Zhe, Yang, Guanlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7
_version_ 1782370635678220288
author Yu, Changhe
Ji, Kangshou
Cao, Huijuan
Wang, Ying
Jin, Hwang Hye
Zhang, Zhe
Yang, Guanlin
author_facet Yu, Changhe
Ji, Kangshou
Cao, Huijuan
Wang, Ying
Jin, Hwang Hye
Zhang, Zhe
Yang, Guanlin
author_sort Yu, Changhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases were searched until January 2013. The study included randomized controlled trials that the effectiveness of acupuncture alone was compared to anti-angina medicines (in addition to conventional treatment) and the effectiveness of a combination of acupuncture plus anti-angina medicines was compared to anti-angina medicines alone. The trial selection, data extraction, quality assessment and data analytic procedures outlined in the 2011 Cochrane Handbook were involved. RESULTS: The study included 25 randomized controlled trials (involving 2,058 patients) that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed that the number of patients with ineffectiveness of angina relief was less in the combined acupuncture-anti-angina treatment group than in the anti-angina medicines alone group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Similarly, compared to the anti-angina medicines alone group, fewer patients in the combined treatment group showed no ECG improvement (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40-0.62, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). However, no differences were observed between acupuncture treatment alone and anti-angina medicines alone for both outcome measures. Only four trials mentioned adverse effects. One trial found no significant difference between acupuncture and Chinese medicine, and three reported no adverse events. The quality of the trials was found to be low. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed very low evidence to support the use of acupuncture for improving angina symptoms and ECG of angina patients. However, the quality of the trials included in this study was low. Large and rigorously designed trials are needed to confirm the potential benefit and adverse events of acupuncture. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4426772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44267722015-05-12 Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Yu, Changhe Ji, Kangshou Cao, Huijuan Wang, Ying Jin, Hwang Hye Zhang, Zhe Yang, Guanlin BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris. METHODS: Eleven electronic databases were searched until January 2013. The study included randomized controlled trials that the effectiveness of acupuncture alone was compared to anti-angina medicines (in addition to conventional treatment) and the effectiveness of a combination of acupuncture plus anti-angina medicines was compared to anti-angina medicines alone. The trial selection, data extraction, quality assessment and data analytic procedures outlined in the 2011 Cochrane Handbook were involved. RESULTS: The study included 25 randomized controlled trials (involving 2,058 patients) that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed that the number of patients with ineffectiveness of angina relief was less in the combined acupuncture-anti-angina treatment group than in the anti-angina medicines alone group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Similarly, compared to the anti-angina medicines alone group, fewer patients in the combined treatment group showed no ECG improvement (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40-0.62, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). However, no differences were observed between acupuncture treatment alone and anti-angina medicines alone for both outcome measures. Only four trials mentioned adverse effects. One trial found no significant difference between acupuncture and Chinese medicine, and three reported no adverse events. The quality of the trials was found to be low. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed very low evidence to support the use of acupuncture for improving angina symptoms and ECG of angina patients. However, the quality of the trials included in this study was low. Large and rigorously designed trials are needed to confirm the potential benefit and adverse events of acupuncture. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4426772/ /pubmed/25888363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7 Text en © Yu et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Changhe
Ji, Kangshou
Cao, Huijuan
Wang, Ying
Jin, Hwang Hye
Zhang, Zhe
Yang, Guanlin
Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness of acupuncture for angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0586-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchanghe effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jikangshou effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT caohuijuan effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangying effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jinhwanghye effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangzhe effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangguanlin effectivenessofacupunctureforanginapectorisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials