Cargando…
Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis
Cardiopulmonary late toxicity is of concern in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the benefit of proton beam therapy (PBT) using clinical data and adaptive dose–volume histogram (DVH) analysis. The subjects were 44 patients with esophageal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25755255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv001 |
_version_ | 1782370652113600512 |
---|---|
author | Makishima, Hirokazu Ishikawa, Hitoshi Terunuma, Toshiyuki Hashimoto, Takayuki Yamanashi, Koichi Sekiguchi, Takao Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakae, Takeji Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_facet | Makishima, Hirokazu Ishikawa, Hitoshi Terunuma, Toshiyuki Hashimoto, Takayuki Yamanashi, Koichi Sekiguchi, Takao Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakae, Takeji Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_sort | Makishima, Hirokazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiopulmonary late toxicity is of concern in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the benefit of proton beam therapy (PBT) using clinical data and adaptive dose–volume histogram (DVH) analysis. The subjects were 44 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent definitive CCRT using X-rays (n = 19) or protons (n = 25). Experimental recalculation using protons was performed for the patient actually treated with X-rays, and vice versa. Target coverage and dose constraints of normal tissues were conserved. Lung V5–V20, mean lung dose (MLD), and heart V30–V50 were compared for risk organ doses between experimental plans and actual treatment plans. Potential toxicity was estimated using protons in patients actually treated with X-rays, and vice versa. Pulmonary events of Grade ≥2 occurred in 8/44 cases (18%), and cardiac events were seen in 11 cases (25%). Risk organ doses in patients with events of Grade ≥2 were significantly higher than for those with events of Grade ≤1. Risk organ doses were lower in proton plans compared with X-ray plans. All patients suffering toxicity who were treated with X-rays (n = 13) had reduced predicted doses in lung and heart using protons, while doses in all patients treated with protons (n = 24) with toxicity of Grade ≤1 had worsened predicted toxicity with X-rays. Analysis of normal tissue complication probability showed a potential reduction in toxicity by using proton beams. Irradiation dose, volume and adverse effects on the heart and lung can be reduced using protons. Thus, PBT is a promising treatment modality for the management of esophageal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4426925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44269252015-05-15 Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis Makishima, Hirokazu Ishikawa, Hitoshi Terunuma, Toshiyuki Hashimoto, Takayuki Yamanashi, Koichi Sekiguchi, Takao Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakae, Takeji Sakurai, Hideyuki J Radiat Res Oncology Cardiopulmonary late toxicity is of concern in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the benefit of proton beam therapy (PBT) using clinical data and adaptive dose–volume histogram (DVH) analysis. The subjects were 44 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent definitive CCRT using X-rays (n = 19) or protons (n = 25). Experimental recalculation using protons was performed for the patient actually treated with X-rays, and vice versa. Target coverage and dose constraints of normal tissues were conserved. Lung V5–V20, mean lung dose (MLD), and heart V30–V50 were compared for risk organ doses between experimental plans and actual treatment plans. Potential toxicity was estimated using protons in patients actually treated with X-rays, and vice versa. Pulmonary events of Grade ≥2 occurred in 8/44 cases (18%), and cardiac events were seen in 11 cases (25%). Risk organ doses in patients with events of Grade ≥2 were significantly higher than for those with events of Grade ≤1. Risk organ doses were lower in proton plans compared with X-ray plans. All patients suffering toxicity who were treated with X-rays (n = 13) had reduced predicted doses in lung and heart using protons, while doses in all patients treated with protons (n = 24) with toxicity of Grade ≤1 had worsened predicted toxicity with X-rays. Analysis of normal tissue complication probability showed a potential reduction in toxicity by using proton beams. Irradiation dose, volume and adverse effects on the heart and lung can be reduced using protons. Thus, PBT is a promising treatment modality for the management of esophageal cancer. Oxford University Press 2015-05 2015-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4426925/ /pubmed/25755255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv001 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Oncology Makishima, Hirokazu Ishikawa, Hitoshi Terunuma, Toshiyuki Hashimoto, Takayuki Yamanashi, Koichi Sekiguchi, Takao Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakae, Takeji Sakurai, Hideyuki Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis |
title | Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis |
title_full | Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis |
title_short | Comparison of adverse effects of proton and X-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis |
title_sort | comparison of adverse effects of proton and x-ray chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using an adaptive dose–volume histogram analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25755255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makishimahirokazu comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT ishikawahitoshi comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT terunumatoshiyuki comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT hashimototakayuki comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT yamanashikoichi comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT sekiguchitakao comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT mizumotomasashi comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT okumuratoshiyuki comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT sakaetakeji comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis AT sakuraihideyuki comparisonofadverseeffectsofprotonandxraychemoradiotherapyforesophagealcancerusinganadaptivedosevolumehistogramanalysis |