Cargando…

Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Pretreatment dose verification with beam-by-beam analysis for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is commonly performed with a gantry angle of 0° using a 2D diode detector array. Any changes in multileaf collimator (MLC) position between the actual treatment gantry angle and 0° may result i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sumida, Iori, Yamaguchi, Hajime, Kizaki, Hisao, Aboshi, Keiko, Tsujii, Mari, Yamada, Yuji, Yagi, Masashi, Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25742866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv008
_version_ 1782370653732601856
author Sumida, Iori
Yamaguchi, Hajime
Kizaki, Hisao
Aboshi, Keiko
Tsujii, Mari
Yamada, Yuji
Yagi, Masashi
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_facet Sumida, Iori
Yamaguchi, Hajime
Kizaki, Hisao
Aboshi, Keiko
Tsujii, Mari
Yamada, Yuji
Yagi, Masashi
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
author_sort Sumida, Iori
collection PubMed
description Pretreatment dose verification with beam-by-beam analysis for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is commonly performed with a gantry angle of 0° using a 2D diode detector array. Any changes in multileaf collimator (MLC) position between the actual treatment gantry angle and 0° may result in deviations from the planned dose. We evaluated the effects of MLC positioning errors between the actual treatment gantry angles and nominal gantry angles. A gantry angle correction (GAC) factor was generated by performing a non-gap test at various gantry angles using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). To convert pixel intensity to dose at the MLC abutment positions, a non-gap test was performed using an EPID and a film at 0° gantry angle. We then assessed the correlations between pixel intensities and doses. Beam-by-beam analyses for 15 prostate IMRT cases as patient-specific quality assurance were performed with a 2D diode detector array at 0° gantry angle to determine the relative dose error for each beam. The resulting relative dose error with or without GAC was added back to the original dose grid for each beam. We compared the predicted dose distributions with or without GAC for film measurements to validate GAC effects. A gamma pass rate with a tolerance of 2%/2 mm was used to evaluate these dose distributions. The gamma pass rate with GAC was higher than that without GAC (P = 0.01). The predicted dose distribution improved with GAC, although the dosimetric effect to a patient was minimal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4426932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44269322015-05-15 Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy Sumida, Iori Yamaguchi, Hajime Kizaki, Hisao Aboshi, Keiko Tsujii, Mari Yamada, Yuji Yagi, Masashi Ogawa, Kazuhiko J Radiat Res Physics Pretreatment dose verification with beam-by-beam analysis for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is commonly performed with a gantry angle of 0° using a 2D diode detector array. Any changes in multileaf collimator (MLC) position between the actual treatment gantry angle and 0° may result in deviations from the planned dose. We evaluated the effects of MLC positioning errors between the actual treatment gantry angles and nominal gantry angles. A gantry angle correction (GAC) factor was generated by performing a non-gap test at various gantry angles using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). To convert pixel intensity to dose at the MLC abutment positions, a non-gap test was performed using an EPID and a film at 0° gantry angle. We then assessed the correlations between pixel intensities and doses. Beam-by-beam analyses for 15 prostate IMRT cases as patient-specific quality assurance were performed with a 2D diode detector array at 0° gantry angle to determine the relative dose error for each beam. The resulting relative dose error with or without GAC was added back to the original dose grid for each beam. We compared the predicted dose distributions with or without GAC for film measurements to validate GAC effects. A gamma pass rate with a tolerance of 2%/2 mm was used to evaluate these dose distributions. The gamma pass rate with GAC was higher than that without GAC (P = 0.01). The predicted dose distribution improved with GAC, although the dosimetric effect to a patient was minimal. Oxford University Press 2015-05 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4426932/ /pubmed/25742866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv008 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Physics
Sumida, Iori
Yamaguchi, Hajime
Kizaki, Hisao
Aboshi, Keiko
Tsujii, Mari
Yamada, Yuji
Yagi, Masashi
Ogawa, Kazuhiko
Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_short Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_sort incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3d dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
topic Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4426932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25742866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrv008
work_keys_str_mv AT sumidaiori incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT yamaguchihajime incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT kizakihisao incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT aboshikeiko incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT tsujiimari incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT yamadayuji incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT yagimasashi incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT ogawakazuhiko incorporationofgantryanglecorrectionfor3ddosepredictioninintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy