Cargando…
Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia (GA) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the Web of Knowledge databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25961831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126587 |
_version_ | 1782370718828199936 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Henglong Qin, Baolong He, Deng Lu, Yuchao Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Jiaqiao Wang, Yufeng Wang, Shaogang |
author_facet | Hu, Henglong Qin, Baolong He, Deng Lu, Yuchao Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Jiaqiao Wang, Yufeng Wang, Shaogang |
author_sort | Hu, Henglong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia (GA) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the Web of Knowledge databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. After literature screening and data extraction, a meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) involving 2270 patients were included. Patients receiving RA were associated with shorter operative time (−6.22 min; 95%CI, −9.70 to −2.75; p = 0.0005), lower visual analgesic score on the first and third postoperative day (WMD, −2.62; 95%CI, −3.04 to −2.19; p < 0.00001 WMD, −0.38; 95%CI, −0.58 to −0.18; p = 0.0002), less analgesic requirements (WMD, −59.40 mg; 95%CI, −78.39 to −40.40; p<0.00001), shorter hospitalization (WMD, −0.36d; 95%CI, −0.66 to −0.05; p = 0.02), less blood transfusion (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.41 to 0.93; p = 0.02), fewer modified Clavion-Dindo Grade II (RR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.37 to 0.83; p = 0.005), Grade III or above postoperative complications (RR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.77; p = 0.001), and potential benefits of less fever (RR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.61 to 1.02; p = 0.07), nausea or vomiting (RR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.20 to 1.46; p = 0.23), whereas more intraoperative hypotension (RR, 3.13; 95%CI, 1.76 to 5.59; p = 0.0001) when compared with patients receiving GA. When nRCTs were excluded, most of the results were stable but the significant differences were no longer detectable in blood transfusion, Grade II and more severe complications. No significant difference in the total postoperative complications and stone-free rate were found. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that both RA and GA can provide safe and effective anesthesia for PNL in carefully evaluated and selected patients. Each anesthesia technique has its own advantages but some aspects still remain unclear and need to be explored in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4427359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44273592015-05-21 Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis Hu, Henglong Qin, Baolong He, Deng Lu, Yuchao Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Jiaqiao Wang, Yufeng Wang, Shaogang PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia (GA) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the Web of Knowledge databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. After literature screening and data extraction, a meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) involving 2270 patients were included. Patients receiving RA were associated with shorter operative time (−6.22 min; 95%CI, −9.70 to −2.75; p = 0.0005), lower visual analgesic score on the first and third postoperative day (WMD, −2.62; 95%CI, −3.04 to −2.19; p < 0.00001 WMD, −0.38; 95%CI, −0.58 to −0.18; p = 0.0002), less analgesic requirements (WMD, −59.40 mg; 95%CI, −78.39 to −40.40; p<0.00001), shorter hospitalization (WMD, −0.36d; 95%CI, −0.66 to −0.05; p = 0.02), less blood transfusion (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.41 to 0.93; p = 0.02), fewer modified Clavion-Dindo Grade II (RR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.37 to 0.83; p = 0.005), Grade III or above postoperative complications (RR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.77; p = 0.001), and potential benefits of less fever (RR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.61 to 1.02; p = 0.07), nausea or vomiting (RR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.20 to 1.46; p = 0.23), whereas more intraoperative hypotension (RR, 3.13; 95%CI, 1.76 to 5.59; p = 0.0001) when compared with patients receiving GA. When nRCTs were excluded, most of the results were stable but the significant differences were no longer detectable in blood transfusion, Grade II and more severe complications. No significant difference in the total postoperative complications and stone-free rate were found. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that both RA and GA can provide safe and effective anesthesia for PNL in carefully evaluated and selected patients. Each anesthesia technique has its own advantages but some aspects still remain unclear and need to be explored in future studies. Public Library of Science 2015-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4427359/ /pubmed/25961831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126587 Text en © 2015 Hu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hu, Henglong Qin, Baolong He, Deng Lu, Yuchao Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Jiaqiao Wang, Yufeng Wang, Shaogang Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | regional versus general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25961831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huhenglong regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis AT qinbaolong regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis AT hedeng regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis AT luyuchao regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis AT zhaozhenyu regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis AT zhangjiaqiao regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis AT wangyufeng regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis AT wangshaogang regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis |