Cargando…

Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia (GA) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the Web of Knowledge databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Henglong, Qin, Baolong, He, Deng, Lu, Yuchao, Zhao, Zhenyu, Zhang, Jiaqiao, Wang, Yufeng, Wang, Shaogang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25961831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126587
_version_ 1782370718828199936
author Hu, Henglong
Qin, Baolong
He, Deng
Lu, Yuchao
Zhao, Zhenyu
Zhang, Jiaqiao
Wang, Yufeng
Wang, Shaogang
author_facet Hu, Henglong
Qin, Baolong
He, Deng
Lu, Yuchao
Zhao, Zhenyu
Zhang, Jiaqiao
Wang, Yufeng
Wang, Shaogang
author_sort Hu, Henglong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia (GA) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the Web of Knowledge databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. After literature screening and data extraction, a meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) involving 2270 patients were included. Patients receiving RA were associated with shorter operative time (−6.22 min; 95%CI, −9.70 to −2.75; p = 0.0005), lower visual analgesic score on the first and third postoperative day (WMD, −2.62; 95%CI, −3.04 to −2.19; p < 0.00001 WMD, −0.38; 95%CI, −0.58 to −0.18; p = 0.0002), less analgesic requirements (WMD, −59.40 mg; 95%CI, −78.39 to −40.40; p<0.00001), shorter hospitalization (WMD, −0.36d; 95%CI, −0.66 to −0.05; p = 0.02), less blood transfusion (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.41 to 0.93; p = 0.02), fewer modified Clavion-Dindo Grade II (RR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.37 to 0.83; p = 0.005), Grade III or above postoperative complications (RR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.77; p = 0.001), and potential benefits of less fever (RR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.61 to 1.02; p = 0.07), nausea or vomiting (RR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.20 to 1.46; p = 0.23), whereas more intraoperative hypotension (RR, 3.13; 95%CI, 1.76 to 5.59; p = 0.0001) when compared with patients receiving GA. When nRCTs were excluded, most of the results were stable but the significant differences were no longer detectable in blood transfusion, Grade II and more severe complications. No significant difference in the total postoperative complications and stone-free rate were found. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that both RA and GA can provide safe and effective anesthesia for PNL in carefully evaluated and selected patients. Each anesthesia technique has its own advantages but some aspects still remain unclear and need to be explored in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4427359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44273592015-05-21 Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis Hu, Henglong Qin, Baolong He, Deng Lu, Yuchao Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Jiaqiao Wang, Yufeng Wang, Shaogang PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of regional anesthesia (RA) and general anesthesia (GA) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the Web of Knowledge databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. After literature screening and data extraction, a meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) involving 2270 patients were included. Patients receiving RA were associated with shorter operative time (−6.22 min; 95%CI, −9.70 to −2.75; p = 0.0005), lower visual analgesic score on the first and third postoperative day (WMD, −2.62; 95%CI, −3.04 to −2.19; p < 0.00001 WMD, −0.38; 95%CI, −0.58 to −0.18; p = 0.0002), less analgesic requirements (WMD, −59.40 mg; 95%CI, −78.39 to −40.40; p<0.00001), shorter hospitalization (WMD, −0.36d; 95%CI, −0.66 to −0.05; p = 0.02), less blood transfusion (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.41 to 0.93; p = 0.02), fewer modified Clavion-Dindo Grade II (RR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.37 to 0.83; p = 0.005), Grade III or above postoperative complications (RR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.33 to 0.77; p = 0.001), and potential benefits of less fever (RR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.61 to 1.02; p = 0.07), nausea or vomiting (RR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.20 to 1.46; p = 0.23), whereas more intraoperative hypotension (RR, 3.13; 95%CI, 1.76 to 5.59; p = 0.0001) when compared with patients receiving GA. When nRCTs were excluded, most of the results were stable but the significant differences were no longer detectable in blood transfusion, Grade II and more severe complications. No significant difference in the total postoperative complications and stone-free rate were found. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that both RA and GA can provide safe and effective anesthesia for PNL in carefully evaluated and selected patients. Each anesthesia technique has its own advantages but some aspects still remain unclear and need to be explored in future studies. Public Library of Science 2015-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4427359/ /pubmed/25961831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126587 Text en © 2015 Hu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Henglong
Qin, Baolong
He, Deng
Lu, Yuchao
Zhao, Zhenyu
Zhang, Jiaqiao
Wang, Yufeng
Wang, Shaogang
Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis
title Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort regional versus general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25961831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126587
work_keys_str_mv AT huhenglong regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis
AT qinbaolong regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis
AT hedeng regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis
AT luyuchao regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis
AT zhaozhenyu regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis
AT zhangjiaqiao regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis
AT wangyufeng regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis
AT wangshaogang regionalversusgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyametaanalysis