Cargando…

Exposure-dependent variation in cryolite induced lethality in the non-target insect, Drosophila melanogaster

The starting point of toxicity testing of any chemical in an organism is the determination of its Lethal Concentration 50 (LC(50)). In the present study, LC(50) of a fluorinated insecticide cryolite is determined in a non-target insect model, Drosophila melanogaster. Interestingly, the result shows...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podder, Sayanti, Roy, Sumedha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Slovak Toxicology Society SETOX 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038671
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0003
Descripción
Sumario:The starting point of toxicity testing of any chemical in an organism is the determination of its Lethal Concentration 50 (LC(50)). In the present study, LC(50) of a fluorinated insecticide cryolite is determined in a non-target insect model, Drosophila melanogaster. Interestingly, the result shows that acute LC(50) of cryolite was much greater in comparison to the chronic one in case of Drosophila larvae. Larvae which were exposed to 65,000 to 70,000 µg/ml cryolite through food showed 50% mortality after 18 hours of acute exposure, whereas only 150 to 160 µg/ml cryolite was sufficient to cause 50% mortality in case of chronic exposure. Thus cryolite in a small amount when applied once cannot produce noticeable changes in Drosophila, whereas the same amount when used continuously can be fatal. The non-feeding pupal stage was also seen to be affected by chemical treatment. This suggests that the test chemical affects the developmental fate and results in failure of adult emergence. Absence of chemical-induced mortality in adults assumes that the toxicity of cryolite might be restricted to the preimaginal stages of the organism. Reduction in body size of larvae after ingestion of cryolite (with food) in acute treatment schedule is another interesting finding of this study. Some individuals consuming cryolite containing food cannot survive whereas the few survivors manifest a significant growth retardation which might be due to a tendency of refusal in feeding. Hence the present findings provide a scope of assessment of risk of other similar non-target groups.