Cargando…

Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison

BACKGROUND: The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) mostly uses ‘Situational’ Questions (SQs) as an interview format within a station, rather than ‘Past-Behavioural’ Questions (PBQs), which are most frequently adopted in traditional single-station personal interviews (SSPIs) for non-medical and medical se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshimura, Hiroshi, Kitazono, Hidetaka, Fujitani, Shigeki, Machi, Junji, Saiki, Takuya, Suzuki, Yasuyuki, Ponnamperuma, Gominda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0361-y
_version_ 1782370798969815040
author Yoshimura, Hiroshi
Kitazono, Hidetaka
Fujitani, Shigeki
Machi, Junji
Saiki, Takuya
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Ponnamperuma, Gominda
author_facet Yoshimura, Hiroshi
Kitazono, Hidetaka
Fujitani, Shigeki
Machi, Junji
Saiki, Takuya
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Ponnamperuma, Gominda
author_sort Yoshimura, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) mostly uses ‘Situational’ Questions (SQs) as an interview format within a station, rather than ‘Past-Behavioural’ Questions (PBQs), which are most frequently adopted in traditional single-station personal interviews (SSPIs) for non-medical and medical selection. This study investigated reliability and acceptability of the postgraduate admissions MMI with PBQ and SQ interview formats within MMI stations. METHODS: Twenty-six Japanese medical graduates, first completed the two-year national obligatory initial postgraduate clinical training programme and then applied to three specialty training programmes - internal medicine, general surgery, and emergency medicine - in a Japanese teaching hospital, where they underwent the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-competency-based MMI. This MMI contained five stations, with two examiners per station. In each station, a PBQ, and then an SQ were asked consecutively. PBQ and SQ interview formats were not separated into two different stations, or the order of questioning of PBQs and SQs in individual stations was not changed due to lack of space and experienced examiners. Reliability was analysed for the scores of these two MMI question types. Candidates and examiners were surveyed on this experience. RESULTS: The PBQ and SQ formats had generalisability coefficients of 0.822 and 0.821, respectively. With one examiner per station, seven stations could produce a reliability of more than 0.80 in both PBQ and SQ formats. More than 60% of both candidates and examiners felt positive about the overall candidates’ ability. All participants liked the fairness of this MMI when compared with the previously experienced SSPI. SQs were perceived more favourable by candidates; in contrast, PBQs were perceived more relevant by examiners. CONCLUSIONS: Both PBQs and SQs are equally reliable and acceptable as station interview formats in the postgraduate admissions MMI. However, the use of the two formats within the same station, and with a fixed order, is not the best to maximise its utility as an admission test. Future studies are required to evaluate how best the SQs and PBQs should be combined as station interview formats to enhance reliability, feasibility, acceptability and predictive validity of the MMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4427914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44279142015-05-13 Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison Yoshimura, Hiroshi Kitazono, Hidetaka Fujitani, Shigeki Machi, Junji Saiki, Takuya Suzuki, Yasuyuki Ponnamperuma, Gominda BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) mostly uses ‘Situational’ Questions (SQs) as an interview format within a station, rather than ‘Past-Behavioural’ Questions (PBQs), which are most frequently adopted in traditional single-station personal interviews (SSPIs) for non-medical and medical selection. This study investigated reliability and acceptability of the postgraduate admissions MMI with PBQ and SQ interview formats within MMI stations. METHODS: Twenty-six Japanese medical graduates, first completed the two-year national obligatory initial postgraduate clinical training programme and then applied to three specialty training programmes - internal medicine, general surgery, and emergency medicine - in a Japanese teaching hospital, where they underwent the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-competency-based MMI. This MMI contained five stations, with two examiners per station. In each station, a PBQ, and then an SQ were asked consecutively. PBQ and SQ interview formats were not separated into two different stations, or the order of questioning of PBQs and SQs in individual stations was not changed due to lack of space and experienced examiners. Reliability was analysed for the scores of these two MMI question types. Candidates and examiners were surveyed on this experience. RESULTS: The PBQ and SQ formats had generalisability coefficients of 0.822 and 0.821, respectively. With one examiner per station, seven stations could produce a reliability of more than 0.80 in both PBQ and SQ formats. More than 60% of both candidates and examiners felt positive about the overall candidates’ ability. All participants liked the fairness of this MMI when compared with the previously experienced SSPI. SQs were perceived more favourable by candidates; in contrast, PBQs were perceived more relevant by examiners. CONCLUSIONS: Both PBQs and SQs are equally reliable and acceptable as station interview formats in the postgraduate admissions MMI. However, the use of the two formats within the same station, and with a fixed order, is not the best to maximise its utility as an admission test. Future studies are required to evaluate how best the SQs and PBQs should be combined as station interview formats to enhance reliability, feasibility, acceptability and predictive validity of the MMI. BioMed Central 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4427914/ /pubmed/25890189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0361-y Text en © Yoshimura et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yoshimura, Hiroshi
Kitazono, Hidetaka
Fujitani, Shigeki
Machi, Junji
Saiki, Takuya
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Ponnamperuma, Gominda
Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison
title Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison
title_full Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison
title_fullStr Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison
title_full_unstemmed Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison
title_short Past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison
title_sort past-behavioural versus situational questions in a postgraduate admissions multiple mini-interview: a reliability and acceptability comparison
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0361-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshimurahiroshi pastbehaviouralversussituationalquestionsinapostgraduateadmissionsmultipleminiinterviewareliabilityandacceptabilitycomparison
AT kitazonohidetaka pastbehaviouralversussituationalquestionsinapostgraduateadmissionsmultipleminiinterviewareliabilityandacceptabilitycomparison
AT fujitanishigeki pastbehaviouralversussituationalquestionsinapostgraduateadmissionsmultipleminiinterviewareliabilityandacceptabilitycomparison
AT machijunji pastbehaviouralversussituationalquestionsinapostgraduateadmissionsmultipleminiinterviewareliabilityandacceptabilitycomparison
AT saikitakuya pastbehaviouralversussituationalquestionsinapostgraduateadmissionsmultipleminiinterviewareliabilityandacceptabilitycomparison
AT suzukiyasuyuki pastbehaviouralversussituationalquestionsinapostgraduateadmissionsmultipleminiinterviewareliabilityandacceptabilitycomparison
AT ponnamperumagominda pastbehaviouralversussituationalquestionsinapostgraduateadmissionsmultipleminiinterviewareliabilityandacceptabilitycomparison