Cargando…

Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Whether overweight or obese end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are suitable for renal transplantation (RT) is often debated. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to systematically investigate the outcome of low versus high BMI recipients after RT. METHODS: Comprehensiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafranca, Jeffrey A, IJermans, Jan NM, Betjes, Michiel GH, Dor, Frank JMF
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25963131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0340-5
_version_ 1782370816570163200
author Lafranca, Jeffrey A
IJermans, Jan NM
Betjes, Michiel GH
Dor, Frank JMF
author_facet Lafranca, Jeffrey A
IJermans, Jan NM
Betjes, Michiel GH
Dor, Frank JMF
author_sort Lafranca, Jeffrey A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether overweight or obese end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are suitable for renal transplantation (RT) is often debated. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to systematically investigate the outcome of low versus high BMI recipients after RT. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2014, issue 8). We reviewed four major guidelines that are available regarding (potential) RT recipients. The methodology was in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and written based on the PRISMA statement. The quality assessment of studies was performed by using the GRADE tool. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Random-effects models were used. RESULTS: After identifying 5,526 studies addressing this topic, 56 studies were included. We extracted data for 37 outcome measures (including data of more than 209,000 RT recipients), of which 26 could be meta-analysed. The following outcome measures demonstrated significant differences in favour of low BMI (<30) recipients: mortality (RR = 1.52), delayed graft function (RR = 1.52), acute rejection (RR = 1.17), 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival (RR = 0.97, 0.95, and 0.97), 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survival (RR = 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99), wound infection and dehiscence (RR = 3.13 and 4.85), NODAT (RR = 2.24), length of hospital stay (2.31 days), operation duration (0.77 hours), hypertension (RR = 1.35), and incisional hernia (RR = 2.72). However, patient survival expressed in hazard ratios was in significant favour of high BMI recipients. Differences in other outcome parameters were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Several of the pooled outcome measurements show significant benefits for ‘low’ BMI (<30) recipients. Therefore, we postulate that ESRD patients with a BMI >30 preferably should lose weight prior to RT. If this cannot be achieved with common measures, in morbidly obese RT candidates, bariatric surgery could be considered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0340-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4427990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44279902015-05-13 Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lafranca, Jeffrey A IJermans, Jan NM Betjes, Michiel GH Dor, Frank JMF BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Whether overweight or obese end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are suitable for renal transplantation (RT) is often debated. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to systematically investigate the outcome of low versus high BMI recipients after RT. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2014, issue 8). We reviewed four major guidelines that are available regarding (potential) RT recipients. The methodology was in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and written based on the PRISMA statement. The quality assessment of studies was performed by using the GRADE tool. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Random-effects models were used. RESULTS: After identifying 5,526 studies addressing this topic, 56 studies were included. We extracted data for 37 outcome measures (including data of more than 209,000 RT recipients), of which 26 could be meta-analysed. The following outcome measures demonstrated significant differences in favour of low BMI (<30) recipients: mortality (RR = 1.52), delayed graft function (RR = 1.52), acute rejection (RR = 1.17), 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival (RR = 0.97, 0.95, and 0.97), 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survival (RR = 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99), wound infection and dehiscence (RR = 3.13 and 4.85), NODAT (RR = 2.24), length of hospital stay (2.31 days), operation duration (0.77 hours), hypertension (RR = 1.35), and incisional hernia (RR = 2.72). However, patient survival expressed in hazard ratios was in significant favour of high BMI recipients. Differences in other outcome parameters were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Several of the pooled outcome measurements show significant benefits for ‘low’ BMI (<30) recipients. Therefore, we postulate that ESRD patients with a BMI >30 preferably should lose weight prior to RT. If this cannot be achieved with common measures, in morbidly obese RT candidates, bariatric surgery could be considered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0340-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4427990/ /pubmed/25963131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0340-5 Text en © Lafranca et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lafranca, Jeffrey A
IJermans, Jan NM
Betjes, Michiel GH
Dor, Frank JMF
Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4427990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25963131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0340-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lafrancajeffreya bodymassindexandoutcomeinrenaltransplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ijermansjannm bodymassindexandoutcomeinrenaltransplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT betjesmichielgh bodymassindexandoutcomeinrenaltransplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dorfrankjmf bodymassindexandoutcomeinrenaltransplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis