Cargando…

Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the US dialysis Prospective Payment System bundle, launched in January 2011, was reduction and more accurate prediction of costs of services, whilst maintaining or improving patient care. Dialysis facilities could either adopt the bundle completely (100%) in the first year of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monda, Keri L, Joseph, Parveen Nedra, Neumann, Peter J, Bradbury, Brian D, Rubin, Robert J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0059-8
_version_ 1782370842114523136
author Monda, Keri L
Joseph, Parveen Nedra
Neumann, Peter J
Bradbury, Brian D
Rubin, Robert J
author_facet Monda, Keri L
Joseph, Parveen Nedra
Neumann, Peter J
Bradbury, Brian D
Rubin, Robert J
author_sort Monda, Keri L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the US dialysis Prospective Payment System bundle, launched in January 2011, was reduction and more accurate prediction of costs of services, whilst maintaining or improving patient care. Dialysis facilities could either adopt the bundle completely (100%) in the first year of launch, or phase-in (25%) over four years. Differences in practice patterns and patient outcomes were hypothesized to occur in facilities that phased-in 25% compared to those that did not. METHODS: Data are from STEPPS, a study of 51 small dialysis organization facilities designed to describe trends in dialytic treatment before and after bundle implementation. Baseline was defined as October-December 2010; follow-up as January-December 2011. Facility- and patient-level data were collected at enrollment and regularly thereafter. Cox proportional hazards and linear multi-level models were used to estimate the effect of opting-in 25% (vs. 100%) on practice patterns and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 12 facilities (patient n = 346) opted-in 25% and 37 facilities (patient n = 1296) opted-in 100% to the dialysis bundle. At baseline, patients at 25% facilities were primarily covered by Medicare, were more likely to be black, and were receiving higher monthly epoetin alfa (EPO) doses. Throughout 2011, patients in 100% facilities received lower monthly EPO doses, and had lower mean hemoglobin concentrations; hospitalization and mortality rates were numerically lower in 25% facilities but not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: The economic pressure for dialysis providers to work within an expanded composite rate bundle whilst maintaining patient care may be a driver of practice indicator outcomes. Additional investigations are warranted to more precisely estimate clinical outcomes in patients attending facilities enrolling into the bundle 100% relative to the previous fee-for-service framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0059-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4428114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44281142015-05-13 Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study Monda, Keri L Joseph, Parveen Nedra Neumann, Peter J Bradbury, Brian D Rubin, Robert J BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the US dialysis Prospective Payment System bundle, launched in January 2011, was reduction and more accurate prediction of costs of services, whilst maintaining or improving patient care. Dialysis facilities could either adopt the bundle completely (100%) in the first year of launch, or phase-in (25%) over four years. Differences in practice patterns and patient outcomes were hypothesized to occur in facilities that phased-in 25% compared to those that did not. METHODS: Data are from STEPPS, a study of 51 small dialysis organization facilities designed to describe trends in dialytic treatment before and after bundle implementation. Baseline was defined as October-December 2010; follow-up as January-December 2011. Facility- and patient-level data were collected at enrollment and regularly thereafter. Cox proportional hazards and linear multi-level models were used to estimate the effect of opting-in 25% (vs. 100%) on practice patterns and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 12 facilities (patient n = 346) opted-in 25% and 37 facilities (patient n = 1296) opted-in 100% to the dialysis bundle. At baseline, patients at 25% facilities were primarily covered by Medicare, were more likely to be black, and were receiving higher monthly epoetin alfa (EPO) doses. Throughout 2011, patients in 100% facilities received lower monthly EPO doses, and had lower mean hemoglobin concentrations; hospitalization and mortality rates were numerically lower in 25% facilities but not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: The economic pressure for dialysis providers to work within an expanded composite rate bundle whilst maintaining patient care may be a driver of practice indicator outcomes. Additional investigations are warranted to more precisely estimate clinical outcomes in patients attending facilities enrolling into the bundle 100% relative to the previous fee-for-service framework. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0059-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4428114/ /pubmed/25928734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0059-8 Text en © Monda et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Monda, Keri L
Joseph, Parveen Nedra
Neumann, Peter J
Bradbury, Brian D
Rubin, Robert J
Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study
title Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study
title_full Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study
title_fullStr Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study
title_short Comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the STEPPS study
title_sort comparative changes in treatment practices and clinical outcomes following implementation of a prospective payment system: the stepps study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0059-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mondakeril comparativechangesintreatmentpracticesandclinicaloutcomesfollowingimplementationofaprospectivepaymentsystemthesteppsstudy
AT josephparveennedra comparativechangesintreatmentpracticesandclinicaloutcomesfollowingimplementationofaprospectivepaymentsystemthesteppsstudy
AT neumannpeterj comparativechangesintreatmentpracticesandclinicaloutcomesfollowingimplementationofaprospectivepaymentsystemthesteppsstudy
AT bradburybriand comparativechangesintreatmentpracticesandclinicaloutcomesfollowingimplementationofaprospectivepaymentsystemthesteppsstudy
AT rubinrobertj comparativechangesintreatmentpracticesandclinicaloutcomesfollowingimplementationofaprospectivepaymentsystemthesteppsstudy