Cargando…
Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments
Functional MRI (fMRI) used for neurosurgical planning delineates functionally eloquent brain areas by time-series analysis of task-induced BOLD signal changes. Commonly used frequentist statistics protect against false positive results based on a p-value threshold. In surgical planning, false negati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26029041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00168 |
_version_ | 1782370845114499072 |
---|---|
author | Magerkurth, Joerg Mancini, Laura Penny, William Flandin, Guillaume Ashburner, John Micallef, Caroline De Vita, Enrico Daga, Pankaj White, Mark J. Buckley, Craig Yamamoto, Adam K. Ourselin, Sebastien Yousry, Tarek Thornton, John S. Weiskopf, Nikolaus |
author_facet | Magerkurth, Joerg Mancini, Laura Penny, William Flandin, Guillaume Ashburner, John Micallef, Caroline De Vita, Enrico Daga, Pankaj White, Mark J. Buckley, Craig Yamamoto, Adam K. Ourselin, Sebastien Yousry, Tarek Thornton, John S. Weiskopf, Nikolaus |
author_sort | Magerkurth, Joerg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Functional MRI (fMRI) used for neurosurgical planning delineates functionally eloquent brain areas by time-series analysis of task-induced BOLD signal changes. Commonly used frequentist statistics protect against false positive results based on a p-value threshold. In surgical planning, false negative results are equally if not more harmful, potentially masking true brain activity leading to erroneous resection of eloquent regions. Bayesian statistics provides an alternative framework, categorizing areas as activated, deactivated, non-activated or with low statistical confidence. This approach has not yet found wide clinical application partly due to the lack of a method to objectively define an effect size threshold. We implemented a Bayesian analysis framework for neurosurgical planning fMRI. It entails an automated effect-size threshold selection method for posterior probability maps accounting for inter-individual BOLD response differences, which was calibrated based on the frequentist results maps thresholded by two clinical experts. We compared Bayesian and frequentist analysis of passive-motor fMRI data from 10 healthy volunteers measured on a pre-operative 3T and an intra-operative 1.5T MRI scanner. As a clinical case study, we tested passive motor task activation in a brain tumor patient at 3T under clinical conditions. With our novel effect size threshold method, the Bayesian analysis revealed regions of all four categories in the 3T data. Activated region foci and extent were consistent with the frequentist analysis results. In the lower signal-to-noise ratio 1.5T intra-operative scanner data, Bayesian analysis provided improved brain-activation detection sensitivity compared with the frequentist analysis, albeit the spatial extents of the activations were smaller than at 3T. Bayesian analysis of fMRI data using operator-independent effect size threshold selection may improve the sensitivity and certainty of information available to guide neurosurgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4428130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44281302015-05-29 Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments Magerkurth, Joerg Mancini, Laura Penny, William Flandin, Guillaume Ashburner, John Micallef, Caroline De Vita, Enrico Daga, Pankaj White, Mark J. Buckley, Craig Yamamoto, Adam K. Ourselin, Sebastien Yousry, Tarek Thornton, John S. Weiskopf, Nikolaus Front Neurosci Neuroscience Functional MRI (fMRI) used for neurosurgical planning delineates functionally eloquent brain areas by time-series analysis of task-induced BOLD signal changes. Commonly used frequentist statistics protect against false positive results based on a p-value threshold. In surgical planning, false negative results are equally if not more harmful, potentially masking true brain activity leading to erroneous resection of eloquent regions. Bayesian statistics provides an alternative framework, categorizing areas as activated, deactivated, non-activated or with low statistical confidence. This approach has not yet found wide clinical application partly due to the lack of a method to objectively define an effect size threshold. We implemented a Bayesian analysis framework for neurosurgical planning fMRI. It entails an automated effect-size threshold selection method for posterior probability maps accounting for inter-individual BOLD response differences, which was calibrated based on the frequentist results maps thresholded by two clinical experts. We compared Bayesian and frequentist analysis of passive-motor fMRI data from 10 healthy volunteers measured on a pre-operative 3T and an intra-operative 1.5T MRI scanner. As a clinical case study, we tested passive motor task activation in a brain tumor patient at 3T under clinical conditions. With our novel effect size threshold method, the Bayesian analysis revealed regions of all four categories in the 3T data. Activated region foci and extent were consistent with the frequentist analysis results. In the lower signal-to-noise ratio 1.5T intra-operative scanner data, Bayesian analysis provided improved brain-activation detection sensitivity compared with the frequentist analysis, albeit the spatial extents of the activations were smaller than at 3T. Bayesian analysis of fMRI data using operator-independent effect size threshold selection may improve the sensitivity and certainty of information available to guide neurosurgery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4428130/ /pubmed/26029041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00168 Text en Copyright © 2015 Magerkurth, Mancini, Penny, Flandin, Ashburner, Micallef, De Vita, Daga, White, Buckley, Yamamoto, Ourselin, Yousry, Thornton and Weiskopf. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Magerkurth, Joerg Mancini, Laura Penny, William Flandin, Guillaume Ashburner, John Micallef, Caroline De Vita, Enrico Daga, Pankaj White, Mark J. Buckley, Craig Yamamoto, Adam K. Ourselin, Sebastien Yousry, Tarek Thornton, John S. Weiskopf, Nikolaus Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments |
title | Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments |
title_full | Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments |
title_fullStr | Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments |
title_short | Objective Bayesian fMRI analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments |
title_sort | objective bayesian fmri analysis—a pilot study in different clinical environments |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26029041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magerkurthjoerg objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT mancinilaura objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT pennywilliam objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT flandinguillaume objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT ashburnerjohn objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT micallefcaroline objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT devitaenrico objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT dagapankaj objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT whitemarkj objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT buckleycraig objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT yamamotoadamk objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT ourselinsebastien objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT yousrytarek objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT thorntonjohns objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments AT weiskopfnikolaus objectivebayesianfmrianalysisapilotstudyindifferentclinicalenvironments |