Cargando…

Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to review the reliability and reproducibility of 3D-CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) cephalometric landmark identification. METHODS: : Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for papers published from 1998 to October 2014. Specif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LISBOA, Cinthia de Oliveira, MASTERSON, Daniele, MOTTA, Andréa Fonseca Jardim, MOTTA, Alexandre Trindade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26018303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140336
_version_ 1782370893145571328
author LISBOA, Cinthia de Oliveira
MASTERSON, Daniele
MOTTA, Andréa Fonseca Jardim
MOTTA, Alexandre Trindade
author_facet LISBOA, Cinthia de Oliveira
MASTERSON, Daniele
MOTTA, Andréa Fonseca Jardim
MOTTA, Alexandre Trindade
author_sort LISBOA, Cinthia de Oliveira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to review the reliability and reproducibility of 3D-CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) cephalometric landmark identification. METHODS: : Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for papers published from 1998 to October 2014. Specific strategies were developed for each database, with the guidance of a librarian. Two reviewers independently analyzed the titles and abstracts for inclusion. The articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for full-text reading, and the selected articles went through methodological quality evaluation. After the exclusion of repeated articles, the titles of the remaining ones were read and 1,328 of them were excluded. The abstracts of 173 articles were read, of which 43 were selected, read in full and submitted to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen articles or studies with reliable methodology and reproducibility remained. The data were collected, organized into figures and analyzed for determination of the reliability and reproducibility of the three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks. RESULTS: : Overall, the landmarks on the median sagittal line and dental landmarks had the highest reliability, while the landmarks on the condyle, porion and the orbitale presented lower levels of reliability. Point S must be marked in the multiplanar views associated with visualization in 3D reconstruction. Further studies are necessary for evaluating soft tissue landmarks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4428454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44284542015-05-13 Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review LISBOA, Cinthia de Oliveira MASTERSON, Daniele MOTTA, Andréa Fonseca Jardim MOTTA, Alexandre Trindade J Appl Oral Sci Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to review the reliability and reproducibility of 3D-CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) cephalometric landmark identification. METHODS: : Electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for papers published from 1998 to October 2014. Specific strategies were developed for each database, with the guidance of a librarian. Two reviewers independently analyzed the titles and abstracts for inclusion. The articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for full-text reading, and the selected articles went through methodological quality evaluation. After the exclusion of repeated articles, the titles of the remaining ones were read and 1,328 of them were excluded. The abstracts of 173 articles were read, of which 43 were selected, read in full and submitted to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen articles or studies with reliable methodology and reproducibility remained. The data were collected, organized into figures and analyzed for determination of the reliability and reproducibility of the three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks. RESULTS: : Overall, the landmarks on the median sagittal line and dental landmarks had the highest reliability, while the landmarks on the condyle, porion and the orbitale presented lower levels of reliability. Point S must be marked in the multiplanar views associated with visualization in 3D reconstruction. Further studies are necessary for evaluating soft tissue landmarks. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4428454/ /pubmed/26018303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140336 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
LISBOA, Cinthia de Oliveira
MASTERSON, Daniele
MOTTA, Andréa Fonseca Jardim
MOTTA, Alexandre Trindade
Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_full Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_fullStr Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_short Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review
title_sort reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using cbct: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26018303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140336
work_keys_str_mv AT lisboacinthiadeoliveira reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview
AT mastersondaniele reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview
AT mottaandreafonsecajardim reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview
AT mottaalexandretrindade reliabilityandreproducibilityofthreedimensionalcephalometriclandmarksusingcbctasystematicreview