Cargando…

Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?

OBJECTIVE: Smoking prevalence is frequently estimated on the basis of self-reported smoking status. That can lead to an underestimation of smoking rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between self-reported smoking status and that determined through the use of objective measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stelmach, Rafael, Fernandes, Frederico Leon Arrabal, Carvalho-Pinto, Regina Maria, Athanazio, Rodrigo Abensur, Rached, Samia Zahi, Prado, Gustavo Faibischew, Cukier, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132015000004526
_version_ 1782370951414939648
author Stelmach, Rafael
Fernandes, Frederico Leon Arrabal
Carvalho-Pinto, Regina Maria
Athanazio, Rodrigo Abensur
Rached, Samia Zahi
Prado, Gustavo Faibischew
Cukier, Alberto
author_facet Stelmach, Rafael
Fernandes, Frederico Leon Arrabal
Carvalho-Pinto, Regina Maria
Athanazio, Rodrigo Abensur
Rached, Samia Zahi
Prado, Gustavo Faibischew
Cukier, Alberto
author_sort Stelmach, Rafael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Smoking prevalence is frequently estimated on the basis of self-reported smoking status. That can lead to an underestimation of smoking rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between self-reported smoking status and that determined through the use of objective measures of smoking at a pulmonary outpatient clinic. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving 144 individuals: 51 asthma patients, 53 COPD patients, 20 current smokers, and 20 never-smokers. Smoking status was determined on the basis of self-reports obtained in interviews, as well as through tests of exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and urinary cotinine. RESULTS: All of the asthma patients and COPD patients declared they were not current smokers. In the COPD and asthma patients, the median urinary cotinine concentration was 167 ng/mL (range, 2-5,348 ng/mL) and 47 ng/mL (range, 5-2,735 ng/mL), respectively (p < 0.0001), whereas the median eCO level was 8 ppm (range, 0-31 ppm) and 5 ppm (range, 2-45 ppm), respectively (p < 0.05). In 40 (38%) of the patients with asthma or COPD (n = 104), there was disagreement between the self-reported smoking status and that determined on the basis of the urinary cotinine concentration, a concentration > 200 ng/mL being considered indicative of current smoking. In 48 (46%) of those 104 patients, the self-reported non-smoking status was refuted by an eCO level > 6 ppm, which is also considered indicative of current smoking. In 30 (29%) of the patients with asthma or COPD, the urinary cotinine concentration and the eCO level both belied the patient claims of not being current smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that high proportions of smoking pulmonary patients with lung disease falsely declare themselves to be nonsmokers. The accurate classification of smoking status is pivotal to the treatment of lung diseases. Objective measures of smoking could be helpful in improving clinical management and counseling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4428849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44288492015-05-13 Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth? Stelmach, Rafael Fernandes, Frederico Leon Arrabal Carvalho-Pinto, Regina Maria Athanazio, Rodrigo Abensur Rached, Samia Zahi Prado, Gustavo Faibischew Cukier, Alberto J Bras Pneumol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Smoking prevalence is frequently estimated on the basis of self-reported smoking status. That can lead to an underestimation of smoking rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between self-reported smoking status and that determined through the use of objective measures of smoking at a pulmonary outpatient clinic. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving 144 individuals: 51 asthma patients, 53 COPD patients, 20 current smokers, and 20 never-smokers. Smoking status was determined on the basis of self-reports obtained in interviews, as well as through tests of exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and urinary cotinine. RESULTS: All of the asthma patients and COPD patients declared they were not current smokers. In the COPD and asthma patients, the median urinary cotinine concentration was 167 ng/mL (range, 2-5,348 ng/mL) and 47 ng/mL (range, 5-2,735 ng/mL), respectively (p < 0.0001), whereas the median eCO level was 8 ppm (range, 0-31 ppm) and 5 ppm (range, 2-45 ppm), respectively (p < 0.05). In 40 (38%) of the patients with asthma or COPD (n = 104), there was disagreement between the self-reported smoking status and that determined on the basis of the urinary cotinine concentration, a concentration > 200 ng/mL being considered indicative of current smoking. In 48 (46%) of those 104 patients, the self-reported non-smoking status was refuted by an eCO level > 6 ppm, which is also considered indicative of current smoking. In 30 (29%) of the patients with asthma or COPD, the urinary cotinine concentration and the eCO level both belied the patient claims of not being current smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that high proportions of smoking pulmonary patients with lung disease falsely declare themselves to be nonsmokers. The accurate classification of smoking status is pivotal to the treatment of lung diseases. Objective measures of smoking could be helpful in improving clinical management and counseling. Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4428849/ /pubmed/25972966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132015000004526 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Stelmach, Rafael
Fernandes, Frederico Leon Arrabal
Carvalho-Pinto, Regina Maria
Athanazio, Rodrigo Abensur
Rached, Samia Zahi
Prado, Gustavo Faibischew
Cukier, Alberto
Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?
title Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?
title_full Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?
title_fullStr Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?
title_short Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth?
title_sort comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or copd: are our patients telling us the truth?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132015000004526
work_keys_str_mv AT stelmachrafael comparisonbetweenobjectivemeasuresofsmokingandselfreportedsmokingstatusinpatientswithasthmaorcopdareourpatientstellingusthetruth
AT fernandesfredericoleonarrabal comparisonbetweenobjectivemeasuresofsmokingandselfreportedsmokingstatusinpatientswithasthmaorcopdareourpatientstellingusthetruth
AT carvalhopintoreginamaria comparisonbetweenobjectivemeasuresofsmokingandselfreportedsmokingstatusinpatientswithasthmaorcopdareourpatientstellingusthetruth
AT athanaziorodrigoabensur comparisonbetweenobjectivemeasuresofsmokingandselfreportedsmokingstatusinpatientswithasthmaorcopdareourpatientstellingusthetruth
AT rachedsamiazahi comparisonbetweenobjectivemeasuresofsmokingandselfreportedsmokingstatusinpatientswithasthmaorcopdareourpatientstellingusthetruth
AT pradogustavofaibischew comparisonbetweenobjectivemeasuresofsmokingandselfreportedsmokingstatusinpatientswithasthmaorcopdareourpatientstellingusthetruth
AT cukieralberto comparisonbetweenobjectivemeasuresofsmokingandselfreportedsmokingstatusinpatientswithasthmaorcopdareourpatientstellingusthetruth