Cargando…

Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches

External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmieder, Daniela A., Benítez, Hugo A., Borissov, Ivailo M., Fruciano, Carmelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25965335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127043
_version_ 1782370959074787328
author Schmieder, Daniela A.
Benítez, Hugo A.
Borissov, Ivailo M.
Fruciano, Carmelo
author_facet Schmieder, Daniela A.
Benítez, Hugo A.
Borissov, Ivailo M.
Fruciano, Carmelo
author_sort Schmieder, Daniela A.
collection PubMed
description External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4428882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44288822015-05-21 Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches Schmieder, Daniela A. Benítez, Hugo A. Borissov, Ivailo M. Fruciano, Carmelo PLoS One Research Article External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern. Public Library of Science 2015-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4428882/ /pubmed/25965335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127043 Text en © 2015 Schmieder et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmieder, Daniela A.
Benítez, Hugo A.
Borissov, Ivailo M.
Fruciano, Carmelo
Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
title Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
title_full Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
title_fullStr Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
title_short Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
title_sort bat species comparisons based on external morphology: a test of traditional versus geometric morphometric approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25965335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127043
work_keys_str_mv AT schmiederdanielaa batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches
AT benitezhugoa batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches
AT borissovivailom batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches
AT frucianocarmelo batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches