Cargando…
Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches
External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25965335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127043 |
_version_ | 1782370959074787328 |
---|---|
author | Schmieder, Daniela A. Benítez, Hugo A. Borissov, Ivailo M. Fruciano, Carmelo |
author_facet | Schmieder, Daniela A. Benítez, Hugo A. Borissov, Ivailo M. Fruciano, Carmelo |
author_sort | Schmieder, Daniela A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4428882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44288822015-05-21 Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches Schmieder, Daniela A. Benítez, Hugo A. Borissov, Ivailo M. Fruciano, Carmelo PLoS One Research Article External morphology is commonly used to identify bats as well as to investigate flight and foraging behavior, typically relying on simple length and area measures or ratios. However, geometric morphometrics is increasingly used in the biological sciences to analyse variation in shape and discriminate among species and populations. Here we compare the ability of traditional versus geometric morphometric methods in discriminating between closely related bat species – in this case European horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae, Chiroptera) – based on morphology of the wing, body and tail. In addition to comparing morphometric methods, we used geometric morphometrics to detect interspecies differences as shape changes. Geometric morphometrics yielded improved species discrimination relative to traditional methods. The predicted shape for the variation along the between group principal components revealed that the largest differences between species lay in the extent to which the wing reaches in the direction of the head. This strong trend in interspecific shape variation is associated with size, which we interpret as an evolutionary allometry pattern. Public Library of Science 2015-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4428882/ /pubmed/25965335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127043 Text en © 2015 Schmieder et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schmieder, Daniela A. Benítez, Hugo A. Borissov, Ivailo M. Fruciano, Carmelo Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches |
title | Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches |
title_full | Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches |
title_fullStr | Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches |
title_short | Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches |
title_sort | bat species comparisons based on external morphology: a test of traditional versus geometric morphometric approaches |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4428882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25965335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmiederdanielaa batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches AT benitezhugoa batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches AT borissovivailom batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches AT frucianocarmelo batspeciescomparisonsbasedonexternalmorphologyatestoftraditionalversusgeometricmorphometricapproaches |