Cargando…
Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a devastating lung disease, is changing. To investigate the effectiveness of treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis we undertook a systematic review, network meta-analysis and indirect comparison. METHODS: We searched MEDLI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y |
_version_ | 1782371024064479232 |
---|---|
author | Loveman, Emma Copley, Vicky R Scott, David A Colquitt, Jill L Clegg, Andrew J O’Reilly, Katherine MA |
author_facet | Loveman, Emma Copley, Vicky R Scott, David A Colquitt, Jill L Clegg, Andrew J O’Reilly, Katherine MA |
author_sort | Loveman, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a devastating lung disease, is changing. To investigate the effectiveness of treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis we undertook a systematic review, network meta-analysis and indirect comparison. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane library for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials of pirfenidone, nintedanib or N-acetylcysteine were eligible. Predefined processes for selecting references, extracting data and assessing study quality were applied. Our network meta-analysis of published data used a fixed effect model. For forced vital capacity measures a standardised mean difference approach was used and converted to odds ratios for interpretation. RESULTS: Of 1076 references, 67 were retrieved and 11 studies included. Studies were of reasonable size, populations were similar, and the overall quality was good. Only two treatments, pirfenidone (odds ratio 0.62, 95% credible interval 0.52, 0.74) and nintedanib (0.41, 95% credible interval 0.34, 0.51) produced a statistically significant slowing in the rate of forced vital capacity decline compared with placebo. In an indirect comparison, results indicate that nintedanib is statistically significantly better than pirfenidone in slowing forced vital capacity decline (odds ratio 0.67, 95% credible interval 0.51, 0.88). Results were stable in scenario analysis and random effects models. Indirect comparisons of mortality were not statistically significant between nintedanib and pirfenidone. CONCLUSIONS: Two treatments show beneficial effects and when compared indirectly nintedanib appears to have superior benefit on forced vital capacity. Limitations to indirect comparisons should be considered when interpreting these results, however, our findings can be useful to inform treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4429373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44293732015-05-14 Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis Loveman, Emma Copley, Vicky R Scott, David A Colquitt, Jill L Clegg, Andrew J O’Reilly, Katherine MA BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a devastating lung disease, is changing. To investigate the effectiveness of treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis we undertook a systematic review, network meta-analysis and indirect comparison. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane library for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials of pirfenidone, nintedanib or N-acetylcysteine were eligible. Predefined processes for selecting references, extracting data and assessing study quality were applied. Our network meta-analysis of published data used a fixed effect model. For forced vital capacity measures a standardised mean difference approach was used and converted to odds ratios for interpretation. RESULTS: Of 1076 references, 67 were retrieved and 11 studies included. Studies were of reasonable size, populations were similar, and the overall quality was good. Only two treatments, pirfenidone (odds ratio 0.62, 95% credible interval 0.52, 0.74) and nintedanib (0.41, 95% credible interval 0.34, 0.51) produced a statistically significant slowing in the rate of forced vital capacity decline compared with placebo. In an indirect comparison, results indicate that nintedanib is statistically significantly better than pirfenidone in slowing forced vital capacity decline (odds ratio 0.67, 95% credible interval 0.51, 0.88). Results were stable in scenario analysis and random effects models. Indirect comparisons of mortality were not statistically significant between nintedanib and pirfenidone. CONCLUSIONS: Two treatments show beneficial effects and when compared indirectly nintedanib appears to have superior benefit on forced vital capacity. Limitations to indirect comparisons should be considered when interpreting these results, however, our findings can be useful to inform treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4429373/ /pubmed/25927225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y Text en © Loveman et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Loveman, Emma Copley, Vicky R Scott, David A Colquitt, Jill L Clegg, Andrew J O’Reilly, Katherine MA Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis |
title | Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lovemanemma comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT copleyvickyr comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT scottdavida comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT colquittjilll comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT cleggandrewj comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT oreillykatherinema comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis |