Cargando…

Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a devastating lung disease, is changing. To investigate the effectiveness of treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis we undertook a systematic review, network meta-analysis and indirect comparison. METHODS: We searched MEDLI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loveman, Emma, Copley, Vicky R, Scott, David A, Colquitt, Jill L, Clegg, Andrew J, O’Reilly, Katherine MA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y
_version_ 1782371024064479232
author Loveman, Emma
Copley, Vicky R
Scott, David A
Colquitt, Jill L
Clegg, Andrew J
O’Reilly, Katherine MA
author_facet Loveman, Emma
Copley, Vicky R
Scott, David A
Colquitt, Jill L
Clegg, Andrew J
O’Reilly, Katherine MA
author_sort Loveman, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a devastating lung disease, is changing. To investigate the effectiveness of treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis we undertook a systematic review, network meta-analysis and indirect comparison. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane library for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials of pirfenidone, nintedanib or N-acetylcysteine were eligible. Predefined processes for selecting references, extracting data and assessing study quality were applied. Our network meta-analysis of published data used a fixed effect model. For forced vital capacity measures a standardised mean difference approach was used and converted to odds ratios for interpretation. RESULTS: Of 1076 references, 67 were retrieved and 11 studies included. Studies were of reasonable size, populations were similar, and the overall quality was good. Only two treatments, pirfenidone (odds ratio 0.62, 95% credible interval 0.52, 0.74) and nintedanib (0.41, 95% credible interval 0.34, 0.51) produced a statistically significant slowing in the rate of forced vital capacity decline compared with placebo. In an indirect comparison, results indicate that nintedanib is statistically significantly better than pirfenidone in slowing forced vital capacity decline (odds ratio 0.67, 95% credible interval 0.51, 0.88). Results were stable in scenario analysis and random effects models. Indirect comparisons of mortality were not statistically significant between nintedanib and pirfenidone. CONCLUSIONS: Two treatments show beneficial effects and when compared indirectly nintedanib appears to have superior benefit on forced vital capacity. Limitations to indirect comparisons should be considered when interpreting these results, however, our findings can be useful to inform treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4429373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44293732015-05-14 Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis Loveman, Emma Copley, Vicky R Scott, David A Colquitt, Jill L Clegg, Andrew J O’Reilly, Katherine MA BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a devastating lung disease, is changing. To investigate the effectiveness of treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis we undertook a systematic review, network meta-analysis and indirect comparison. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane library for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials of pirfenidone, nintedanib or N-acetylcysteine were eligible. Predefined processes for selecting references, extracting data and assessing study quality were applied. Our network meta-analysis of published data used a fixed effect model. For forced vital capacity measures a standardised mean difference approach was used and converted to odds ratios for interpretation. RESULTS: Of 1076 references, 67 were retrieved and 11 studies included. Studies were of reasonable size, populations were similar, and the overall quality was good. Only two treatments, pirfenidone (odds ratio 0.62, 95% credible interval 0.52, 0.74) and nintedanib (0.41, 95% credible interval 0.34, 0.51) produced a statistically significant slowing in the rate of forced vital capacity decline compared with placebo. In an indirect comparison, results indicate that nintedanib is statistically significantly better than pirfenidone in slowing forced vital capacity decline (odds ratio 0.67, 95% credible interval 0.51, 0.88). Results were stable in scenario analysis and random effects models. Indirect comparisons of mortality were not statistically significant between nintedanib and pirfenidone. CONCLUSIONS: Two treatments show beneficial effects and when compared indirectly nintedanib appears to have superior benefit on forced vital capacity. Limitations to indirect comparisons should be considered when interpreting these results, however, our findings can be useful to inform treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4429373/ /pubmed/25927225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y Text en © Loveman et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Loveman, Emma
Copley, Vicky R
Scott, David A
Colquitt, Jill L
Clegg, Andrew J
O’Reilly, Katherine MA
Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
title Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0034-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lovemanemma comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT copleyvickyr comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT scottdavida comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT colquittjilll comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT cleggandrewj comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT oreillykatherinema comparingnewtreatmentsforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisanetworkmetaanalysis