Cargando…
About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
Innamorati and colleagues (Innamorati et al., J Headache Pain 16:2, 2015) validated the “stagnation scale” and proposed to use it to screen for psychopathology. I have some critical comments to consider about the theoretical and clinical value of the instrument. First, items of the scale are not spe...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-3 |
_version_ | 1782371036406218752 |
---|---|
author | Crombez, Geert |
author_facet | Crombez, Geert |
author_sort | Crombez, Geert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Innamorati and colleagues (Innamorati et al., J Headache Pain 16:2, 2015) validated the “stagnation scale” and proposed to use it to screen for psychopathology. I have some critical comments to consider about the theoretical and clinical value of the instrument. First, items of the scale are not specific, and may equally well measure worry, self-worth and distress. Second, questionnaires are tools to assess the experiences of patients, but not hypothesized causal processes. The scale can thus not identify patients who repress emotions. Third, the routine use of this instrument will detract clinicians from what really is at stake in patients and what may help them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4429429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44294292015-05-20 About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes Crombez, Geert J Headache Pain Letter to the Editor Innamorati and colleagues (Innamorati et al., J Headache Pain 16:2, 2015) validated the “stagnation scale” and proposed to use it to screen for psychopathology. I have some critical comments to consider about the theoretical and clinical value of the instrument. First, items of the scale are not specific, and may equally well measure worry, self-worth and distress. Second, questionnaires are tools to assess the experiences of patients, but not hypothesized causal processes. The scale can thus not identify patients who repress emotions. Third, the routine use of this instrument will detract clinicians from what really is at stake in patients and what may help them. Springer Milan 2015-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4429429/ /pubmed/25971239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-3 Text en © Crombez; licensee Springer. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor Crombez, Geert About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes |
title | About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes |
title_full | About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes |
title_fullStr | About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes |
title_full_unstemmed | About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes |
title_short | About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes |
title_sort | about stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes |
topic | Letter to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crombezgeert aboutstagnationandtheemperorsnewclothes |