Cargando…

About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes

Innamorati and colleagues (Innamorati et al., J Headache Pain 16:2, 2015) validated the “stagnation scale” and proposed to use it to screen for psychopathology. I have some critical comments to consider about the theoretical and clinical value of the instrument. First, items of the scale are not spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Crombez, Geert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-3
_version_ 1782371036406218752
author Crombez, Geert
author_facet Crombez, Geert
author_sort Crombez, Geert
collection PubMed
description Innamorati and colleagues (Innamorati et al., J Headache Pain 16:2, 2015) validated the “stagnation scale” and proposed to use it to screen for psychopathology. I have some critical comments to consider about the theoretical and clinical value of the instrument. First, items of the scale are not specific, and may equally well measure worry, self-worth and distress. Second, questionnaires are tools to assess the experiences of patients, but not hypothesized causal processes. The scale can thus not identify patients who repress emotions. Third, the routine use of this instrument will detract clinicians from what really is at stake in patients and what may help them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4429429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44294292015-05-20 About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes Crombez, Geert J Headache Pain Letter to the Editor Innamorati and colleagues (Innamorati et al., J Headache Pain 16:2, 2015) validated the “stagnation scale” and proposed to use it to screen for psychopathology. I have some critical comments to consider about the theoretical and clinical value of the instrument. First, items of the scale are not specific, and may equally well measure worry, self-worth and distress. Second, questionnaires are tools to assess the experiences of patients, but not hypothesized causal processes. The scale can thus not identify patients who repress emotions. Third, the routine use of this instrument will detract clinicians from what really is at stake in patients and what may help them. Springer Milan 2015-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4429429/ /pubmed/25971239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-3 Text en © Crombez; licensee Springer. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Crombez, Geert
About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
title About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
title_full About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
title_fullStr About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
title_full_unstemmed About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
title_short About stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
title_sort about stagnation and the emperor’s new clothes
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-3
work_keys_str_mv AT crombezgeert aboutstagnationandtheemperorsnewclothes