Cargando…

Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Although the prone position providing better exposure for anorectal surgery is required it can cause a reduction of cardiac output and cardiac index. The goal was to compare haemodynamic changes assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low-dose spinal anaesthesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borodiciene, Jurgita, Gudaityte, Jurate, Macas, Andrius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25943374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0055-3
_version_ 1782371037325819904
author Borodiciene, Jurgita
Gudaityte, Jurate
Macas, Andrius
author_facet Borodiciene, Jurgita
Gudaityte, Jurate
Macas, Andrius
author_sort Borodiciene, Jurgita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the prone position providing better exposure for anorectal surgery is required it can cause a reduction of cardiac output and cardiac index. The goal was to compare haemodynamic changes assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low-dose spinal anaesthesia in lithotomy and jack-knife position. METHODS: The prospective randomized controlled study included 104, ASA I-II adult patients admitted for elective minor anorectal surgery, assigned to be performed in lithotomy (groupL, n = 52) or jack-knife position (groupJ, n = 52). After arrival to operating room the standard monitoring, impedance cardiography device was connected to the patient, and the following variables were recorded: cardiac output, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, stroke index at times of arrival to operating room, placement for, start and end of surgery and placement to bed. Spinal block was made in the sitting position with 4 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 μg of Fentanyl injected over 2 min. Comparison was based on haemodynamic changes between and inside groups over time. Student’s t, chi square tests were used for statistical analysis with p < 0.05 regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: The reduction of cardiac output was statistically significant after placement of the patient into the prone position: from baseline 7.4+/−1.6 to 4.9+/−1.2 after placement for and 4.7+/−1.2 at the start and end of surgery (mean +/−SD l/min). The difference of cardiac output between groups was 2.0 l/min after positioning for and the start of surgery and 1.5 l/min at the end of surgery (p < 0.05). Mean cardiac index reduced from baseline 3.9+/−0.8 to 2.6+/−0.7 and 2.4+/−0.6 (mean+/−SD l/min/m(2)) in groupJ and between groups: by 1.0 l/min/m(2) after placement for, 1.1 at the start and 0.8 at the end of surgery (p < 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance increased from baseline 1080+/−338 to 1483+/−479 after placement for, 1523+/−481 at the start and 1525+/−545 at the end of surgery in groupJ (mean+/−SD dynes/sec/cm(−5), p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to impedance cardiography, jack-knife position after low-dose spinal anaesthesia produces transitory, but statistically significant reduction of cardiac output and cardiac index with increase of systemic vascular resistance, compared to insignificant changes in lithotomy position. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT02115178.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4429455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44294552015-05-14 Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial Borodiciene, Jurgita Gudaityte, Jurate Macas, Andrius BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although the prone position providing better exposure for anorectal surgery is required it can cause a reduction of cardiac output and cardiac index. The goal was to compare haemodynamic changes assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low-dose spinal anaesthesia in lithotomy and jack-knife position. METHODS: The prospective randomized controlled study included 104, ASA I-II adult patients admitted for elective minor anorectal surgery, assigned to be performed in lithotomy (groupL, n = 52) or jack-knife position (groupJ, n = 52). After arrival to operating room the standard monitoring, impedance cardiography device was connected to the patient, and the following variables were recorded: cardiac output, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, stroke index at times of arrival to operating room, placement for, start and end of surgery and placement to bed. Spinal block was made in the sitting position with 4 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 μg of Fentanyl injected over 2 min. Comparison was based on haemodynamic changes between and inside groups over time. Student’s t, chi square tests were used for statistical analysis with p < 0.05 regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: The reduction of cardiac output was statistically significant after placement of the patient into the prone position: from baseline 7.4+/−1.6 to 4.9+/−1.2 after placement for and 4.7+/−1.2 at the start and end of surgery (mean +/−SD l/min). The difference of cardiac output between groups was 2.0 l/min after positioning for and the start of surgery and 1.5 l/min at the end of surgery (p < 0.05). Mean cardiac index reduced from baseline 3.9+/−0.8 to 2.6+/−0.7 and 2.4+/−0.6 (mean+/−SD l/min/m(2)) in groupJ and between groups: by 1.0 l/min/m(2) after placement for, 1.1 at the start and 0.8 at the end of surgery (p < 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance increased from baseline 1080+/−338 to 1483+/−479 after placement for, 1523+/−481 at the start and 1525+/−545 at the end of surgery in groupJ (mean+/−SD dynes/sec/cm(−5), p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to impedance cardiography, jack-knife position after low-dose spinal anaesthesia produces transitory, but statistically significant reduction of cardiac output and cardiac index with increase of systemic vascular resistance, compared to insignificant changes in lithotomy position. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT02115178. BioMed Central 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4429455/ /pubmed/25943374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0055-3 Text en © Borodiciene et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Borodiciene, Jurgita
Gudaityte, Jurate
Macas, Andrius
Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25943374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0055-3
work_keys_str_mv AT borodicienejurgita lithotomyversusjackknifepositiononhaemodynamicparametersassessedbyimpedancecardiographyduringanorectalsurgeryunderlowdosespinalanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gudaitytejurate lithotomyversusjackknifepositiononhaemodynamicparametersassessedbyimpedancecardiographyduringanorectalsurgeryunderlowdosespinalanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT macasandrius lithotomyversusjackknifepositiononhaemodynamicparametersassessedbyimpedancecardiographyduringanorectalsurgeryunderlowdosespinalanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial