Cargando…

Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences

This comprehensive review critically evaluates whether supposed health benefits propounded upon human consumption of conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) are clinically proven or not. With a general introduction on the chemistry of CLA, major clinical evidences pertaining to intervention strategies, bod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin, Sailas, Prakasan, Priji, Sreedharan, Sajith, Wright, Andre-Denis G, Spener, Friedrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-12-4
_version_ 1782371037801873408
author Benjamin, Sailas
Prakasan, Priji
Sreedharan, Sajith
Wright, Andre-Denis G
Spener, Friedrich
author_facet Benjamin, Sailas
Prakasan, Priji
Sreedharan, Sajith
Wright, Andre-Denis G
Spener, Friedrich
author_sort Benjamin, Sailas
collection PubMed
description This comprehensive review critically evaluates whether supposed health benefits propounded upon human consumption of conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) are clinically proven or not. With a general introduction on the chemistry of CLA, major clinical evidences pertaining to intervention strategies, body composition, cardio-vascular health, immunity, asthma, cancer and diabetes are evaluated. Supposed adverse effects such as oxidative stress, insulin resistance, irritation of intestinal tract and milk fat depression are also examined. It seems that no consistent result was observed even in similar studies conducted at different laboratories, this may be due to variations in age, gender, racial and geographical disparities, coupled with type and dose of CLA supplemented. Thus, supposed promising results reported in mechanistic and pre-clinical studies cannot be extrapolated with humans, mainly due to the lack of inconsistency in analyses, prolonged intervention studies, follow-up studies and international co-ordination of concerted studies. Briefly, clinical evidences accumulated thus far show that CLA is not eliciting significantly promising and consistent health effects so as to uphold it as neither a functional nor a medical food.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4429457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44294572015-05-14 Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences Benjamin, Sailas Prakasan, Priji Sreedharan, Sajith Wright, Andre-Denis G Spener, Friedrich Nutr Metab (Lond) Review This comprehensive review critically evaluates whether supposed health benefits propounded upon human consumption of conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) are clinically proven or not. With a general introduction on the chemistry of CLA, major clinical evidences pertaining to intervention strategies, body composition, cardio-vascular health, immunity, asthma, cancer and diabetes are evaluated. Supposed adverse effects such as oxidative stress, insulin resistance, irritation of intestinal tract and milk fat depression are also examined. It seems that no consistent result was observed even in similar studies conducted at different laboratories, this may be due to variations in age, gender, racial and geographical disparities, coupled with type and dose of CLA supplemented. Thus, supposed promising results reported in mechanistic and pre-clinical studies cannot be extrapolated with humans, mainly due to the lack of inconsistency in analyses, prolonged intervention studies, follow-up studies and international co-ordination of concerted studies. Briefly, clinical evidences accumulated thus far show that CLA is not eliciting significantly promising and consistent health effects so as to uphold it as neither a functional nor a medical food. BioMed Central 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4429457/ /pubmed/25972911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-12-4 Text en © Benjamin et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Benjamin, Sailas
Prakasan, Priji
Sreedharan, Sajith
Wright, Andre-Denis G
Spener, Friedrich
Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
title Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
title_full Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
title_fullStr Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
title_full_unstemmed Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
title_short Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
title_sort pros and cons of cla consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-12-4
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminsailas prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences
AT prakasanpriji prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences
AT sreedharansajith prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences
AT wrightandredenisg prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences
AT spenerfriedrich prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences