Cargando…
Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences
This comprehensive review critically evaluates whether supposed health benefits propounded upon human consumption of conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) are clinically proven or not. With a general introduction on the chemistry of CLA, major clinical evidences pertaining to intervention strategies, bod...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-12-4 |
_version_ | 1782371037801873408 |
---|---|
author | Benjamin, Sailas Prakasan, Priji Sreedharan, Sajith Wright, Andre-Denis G Spener, Friedrich |
author_facet | Benjamin, Sailas Prakasan, Priji Sreedharan, Sajith Wright, Andre-Denis G Spener, Friedrich |
author_sort | Benjamin, Sailas |
collection | PubMed |
description | This comprehensive review critically evaluates whether supposed health benefits propounded upon human consumption of conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) are clinically proven or not. With a general introduction on the chemistry of CLA, major clinical evidences pertaining to intervention strategies, body composition, cardio-vascular health, immunity, asthma, cancer and diabetes are evaluated. Supposed adverse effects such as oxidative stress, insulin resistance, irritation of intestinal tract and milk fat depression are also examined. It seems that no consistent result was observed even in similar studies conducted at different laboratories, this may be due to variations in age, gender, racial and geographical disparities, coupled with type and dose of CLA supplemented. Thus, supposed promising results reported in mechanistic and pre-clinical studies cannot be extrapolated with humans, mainly due to the lack of inconsistency in analyses, prolonged intervention studies, follow-up studies and international co-ordination of concerted studies. Briefly, clinical evidences accumulated thus far show that CLA is not eliciting significantly promising and consistent health effects so as to uphold it as neither a functional nor a medical food. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4429457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44294572015-05-14 Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences Benjamin, Sailas Prakasan, Priji Sreedharan, Sajith Wright, Andre-Denis G Spener, Friedrich Nutr Metab (Lond) Review This comprehensive review critically evaluates whether supposed health benefits propounded upon human consumption of conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) are clinically proven or not. With a general introduction on the chemistry of CLA, major clinical evidences pertaining to intervention strategies, body composition, cardio-vascular health, immunity, asthma, cancer and diabetes are evaluated. Supposed adverse effects such as oxidative stress, insulin resistance, irritation of intestinal tract and milk fat depression are also examined. It seems that no consistent result was observed even in similar studies conducted at different laboratories, this may be due to variations in age, gender, racial and geographical disparities, coupled with type and dose of CLA supplemented. Thus, supposed promising results reported in mechanistic and pre-clinical studies cannot be extrapolated with humans, mainly due to the lack of inconsistency in analyses, prolonged intervention studies, follow-up studies and international co-ordination of concerted studies. Briefly, clinical evidences accumulated thus far show that CLA is not eliciting significantly promising and consistent health effects so as to uphold it as neither a functional nor a medical food. BioMed Central 2015-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4429457/ /pubmed/25972911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-12-4 Text en © Benjamin et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Benjamin, Sailas Prakasan, Priji Sreedharan, Sajith Wright, Andre-Denis G Spener, Friedrich Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences |
title | Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences |
title_full | Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences |
title_fullStr | Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences |
title_full_unstemmed | Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences |
title_short | Pros and cons of CLA consumption: an insight from clinical evidences |
title_sort | pros and cons of cla consumption: an insight from clinical evidences |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-12-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminsailas prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences AT prakasanpriji prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences AT sreedharansajith prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences AT wrightandredenisg prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences AT spenerfriedrich prosandconsofclaconsumptionaninsightfromclinicalevidences |