Cargando…

Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate predictors and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients treated for acetabular fractures in a tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective cohort study with a nested case–control study. All patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baschera, Dominik, Rad, Hooman, Collopy, Dermot, Zellweger, René
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0202-z
_version_ 1782371041311457280
author Baschera, Dominik
Rad, Hooman
Collopy, Dermot
Zellweger, René
author_facet Baschera, Dominik
Rad, Hooman
Collopy, Dermot
Zellweger, René
author_sort Baschera, Dominik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate predictors and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients treated for acetabular fractures in a tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective cohort study with a nested case–control study. All patients treated with internal fixation of acetabular fractures from January 2004 to October 2013. Ninety patients had postoperative imaging available at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and received no prophylaxis. Plain radiographs were used to grade HO. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was used to compare outcomes between patients suffering from HO with patients who did not. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (17.7%) suffered from HO. According to the Brooker classification, 5 had class I, 4 class II, 3 class III and 4 class IV HO. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was the only significant risk factor for developing HO (odds ratio (OR) 8.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.693–43.753), p = 0.014). The HO rate in patients with an anterior (ilioinguinal) or posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck) surgical approach was 20% and 21% respectively, and the HO rate in patients with a combined approach was much lower at 11%. Neither fracture type nor gender nor age increased the risk of HO significantly. The outcome measured by HOOS was not significantly different between patients with HO and patients in the control group. Patients with HO Brooker class II–IV had slightly lower (effect estimate +4.25, 95% CI (−10.2 to +12.10), p = 0.220) HOOS compared to the majority of the control group. CONCLUSION: A very low rate of HO was found compared to the HO rates described in other studies with similar patient cohorts who received prophylaxis. Based on our findings and the current literature, we do not recommend giving prophylaxis against HO to patients after internal fixation of acetabular fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4429472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44294722015-05-14 Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study Baschera, Dominik Rad, Hooman Collopy, Dermot Zellweger, René J Orthop Surg Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate predictors and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients treated for acetabular fractures in a tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective cohort study with a nested case–control study. All patients treated with internal fixation of acetabular fractures from January 2004 to October 2013. Ninety patients had postoperative imaging available at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and received no prophylaxis. Plain radiographs were used to grade HO. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was used to compare outcomes between patients suffering from HO with patients who did not. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (17.7%) suffered from HO. According to the Brooker classification, 5 had class I, 4 class II, 3 class III and 4 class IV HO. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was the only significant risk factor for developing HO (odds ratio (OR) 8.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.693–43.753), p = 0.014). The HO rate in patients with an anterior (ilioinguinal) or posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck) surgical approach was 20% and 21% respectively, and the HO rate in patients with a combined approach was much lower at 11%. Neither fracture type nor gender nor age increased the risk of HO significantly. The outcome measured by HOOS was not significantly different between patients with HO and patients in the control group. Patients with HO Brooker class II–IV had slightly lower (effect estimate +4.25, 95% CI (−10.2 to +12.10), p = 0.220) HOOS compared to the majority of the control group. CONCLUSION: A very low rate of HO was found compared to the HO rates described in other studies with similar patient cohorts who received prophylaxis. Based on our findings and the current literature, we do not recommend giving prophylaxis against HO to patients after internal fixation of acetabular fractures. BioMed Central 2015-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4429472/ /pubmed/25956896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0202-z Text en © Baschera et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baschera, Dominik
Rad, Hooman
Collopy, Dermot
Zellweger, René
Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study
title Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study
title_full Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study
title_fullStr Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study
title_short Incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study
title_sort incidence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification after internal fixation of acetabular fractures: retrospective cohort and case control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0202-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bascheradominik incidenceandclinicalrelevanceofheterotopicossificationafterinternalfixationofacetabularfracturesretrospectivecohortandcasecontrolstudy
AT radhooman incidenceandclinicalrelevanceofheterotopicossificationafterinternalfixationofacetabularfracturesretrospectivecohortandcasecontrolstudy
AT collopydermot incidenceandclinicalrelevanceofheterotopicossificationafterinternalfixationofacetabularfracturesretrospectivecohortandcasecontrolstudy
AT zellwegerrene incidenceandclinicalrelevanceofheterotopicossificationafterinternalfixationofacetabularfracturesretrospectivecohortandcasecontrolstudy