Cargando…

SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Recruitment rates in multi-centre randomised trials often fall below target recruitment rates, causing problems for study outcomes. The Studies Within A Trial (SWAT) Programme, established by the All-Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research in collaboration with the Medical Research C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Valerie, Clarke, Mike, Begley, Cecily, Devane, Declan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25958221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0732-z
_version_ 1782371063503519744
author Smith, Valerie
Clarke, Mike
Begley, Cecily
Devane, Declan
author_facet Smith, Valerie
Clarke, Mike
Begley, Cecily
Devane, Declan
author_sort Smith, Valerie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruitment rates in multi-centre randomised trials often fall below target recruitment rates, causing problems for study outcomes. The Studies Within A Trial (SWAT) Programme, established by the All-Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research in collaboration with the Medical Research Council Network of Hubs in the United Kingdom and others, is developing methods for evaluating aspects of trial methodology through the conduct of research within research. A recently published design for a SWAT-1 provides a protocol for evaluating the effect of a site visit by the principal investigator on recruitment in multi-centre trials. METHODS: Using the SWAT-1 design, the effect of a site visit, with the sole purpose of discussing trial recruitment, on recruitment rates in a large multicentre trial in the Republic of Ireland was evaluated. A controlled before and after intervention comparison was used, where the date of the site visit provides the time point for the intervention, and for the comparison to control sites. Site A received the intervention. Site B and Site C acted as the controls. Z-scores for proportions were calculated to determine within site recruitment differences. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine between site recruitment differences. RESULTS: Recruitment rates were increased in Site A post-intervention (17% and 14% percentage point increases at 1 and 3 months, respectively). No differences in recruitment occurred in Site B or in Site C. Comparing between site differences, at 3 months post-intervention, a statistically significant difference was detected in favour of higher recruitment in Site A (34% versus 25%; odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.26). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported example of a study in the SWAT programme.. It provides evidence that a site visit, combined with a scheduled meeting, increases recruitment in a clinical trial. Using this example, other researchers might be encouraged to consider conducting a similar study, allowing the findings of future SWAT-1s to be compared and combined, so that higher level evidence on the effect of a site visit by the principal investigator can be obtained. THE ADCAR TRIAL: ISRCTN-96340041 (www.controlled-trials.com); date of registration: 25 March 2008.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4429599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44295992015-05-14 SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial Smith, Valerie Clarke, Mike Begley, Cecily Devane, Declan Trials Research BACKGROUND: Recruitment rates in multi-centre randomised trials often fall below target recruitment rates, causing problems for study outcomes. The Studies Within A Trial (SWAT) Programme, established by the All-Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research in collaboration with the Medical Research Council Network of Hubs in the United Kingdom and others, is developing methods for evaluating aspects of trial methodology through the conduct of research within research. A recently published design for a SWAT-1 provides a protocol for evaluating the effect of a site visit by the principal investigator on recruitment in multi-centre trials. METHODS: Using the SWAT-1 design, the effect of a site visit, with the sole purpose of discussing trial recruitment, on recruitment rates in a large multicentre trial in the Republic of Ireland was evaluated. A controlled before and after intervention comparison was used, where the date of the site visit provides the time point for the intervention, and for the comparison to control sites. Site A received the intervention. Site B and Site C acted as the controls. Z-scores for proportions were calculated to determine within site recruitment differences. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine between site recruitment differences. RESULTS: Recruitment rates were increased in Site A post-intervention (17% and 14% percentage point increases at 1 and 3 months, respectively). No differences in recruitment occurred in Site B or in Site C. Comparing between site differences, at 3 months post-intervention, a statistically significant difference was detected in favour of higher recruitment in Site A (34% versus 25%; odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.26). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported example of a study in the SWAT programme.. It provides evidence that a site visit, combined with a scheduled meeting, increases recruitment in a clinical trial. Using this example, other researchers might be encouraged to consider conducting a similar study, allowing the findings of future SWAT-1s to be compared and combined, so that higher level evidence on the effect of a site visit by the principal investigator can be obtained. THE ADCAR TRIAL: ISRCTN-96340041 (www.controlled-trials.com); date of registration: 25 March 2008. BioMed Central 2015-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4429599/ /pubmed/25958221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0732-z Text en © Smith et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Smith, Valerie
Clarke, Mike
Begley, Cecily
Devane, Declan
SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial
title SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial
title_full SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial
title_fullStr SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial
title_short SWAT-1: The effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial
title_sort swat-1: the effectiveness of a ‘site visit’ intervention on recruitment rates in a multi-centre randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25958221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0732-z
work_keys_str_mv AT smithvalerie swat1theeffectivenessofasitevisitinterventiononrecruitmentratesinamulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT clarkemike swat1theeffectivenessofasitevisitinterventiononrecruitmentratesinamulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT begleycecily swat1theeffectivenessofasitevisitinterventiononrecruitmentratesinamulticentrerandomisedtrial
AT devanedeclan swat1theeffectivenessofasitevisitinterventiononrecruitmentratesinamulticentrerandomisedtrial