Cargando…

Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delusional beliefs with persecutory content are common in psychosis, but difficult to treat. Interventions targeting hypothesised causal and maintaining factors have been proposed as a way of improving therapy. The current study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waller, Helen, Emsley, Richard, Freeman, Daniel, Bebbington, Paul, Dunn, Graham, Fowler, David, Hardy, Amy, Kuipers, Elizabeth, Garety, Philippa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25770671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.007
_version_ 1782371109768790016
author Waller, Helen
Emsley, Richard
Freeman, Daniel
Bebbington, Paul
Dunn, Graham
Fowler, David
Hardy, Amy
Kuipers, Elizabeth
Garety, Philippa
author_facet Waller, Helen
Emsley, Richard
Freeman, Daniel
Bebbington, Paul
Dunn, Graham
Fowler, David
Hardy, Amy
Kuipers, Elizabeth
Garety, Philippa
author_sort Waller, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delusional beliefs with persecutory content are common in psychosis, but difficult to treat. Interventions targeting hypothesised causal and maintaining factors have been proposed as a way of improving therapy. The current study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial of the ‘Thinking Well (TW)’ intervention: This novel approach combines the recently developed Maudsley Review Training Programme (MRTP), with additional, focussed cognitive-behavioural therapy sessions. METHODS: 31 participants with distressing persecutory delusions and schizophrenia spectrum disorders were randomised to TW or to treatment as usual in a 2:1 ratio. Participants completed outcome assessments at 0 (baseline), 1 (post-MRTP), 6 (post-TW) and 8 (follow-up) weeks. Key outcomes included belief flexibility, paranoia, and delusional conviction and distress. Participants allocated to TW completed the MRTP package and four CBT sessions with a clinical psychologist. RESULTS: Recruitment proved feasible. Participants reported the intervention was relevant and had resulted in positive changes in thinking and mood, which they could use in everyday life. Treatment effects were moderate-large for key outcomes including belief flexibility, paranoia conviction and distress. The additional TW sessions appeared to confer benefits over MRTP alone. LIMITATIONS: Assessments were not carried out blind to treatment condition. Recruitment was opportunistic, from an identified pool of research participants. Finally, a few participants had already completed the MRTP as part of a previous study. CONCLUSIONS: The TW intervention appears to be feasible and acceptable to participants, and the effects of treatment are promising. A fully powered randomised controlled trial of the intervention is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4429971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44299712015-09-01 Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs Waller, Helen Emsley, Richard Freeman, Daniel Bebbington, Paul Dunn, Graham Fowler, David Hardy, Amy Kuipers, Elizabeth Garety, Philippa J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delusional beliefs with persecutory content are common in psychosis, but difficult to treat. Interventions targeting hypothesised causal and maintaining factors have been proposed as a way of improving therapy. The current study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial of the ‘Thinking Well (TW)’ intervention: This novel approach combines the recently developed Maudsley Review Training Programme (MRTP), with additional, focussed cognitive-behavioural therapy sessions. METHODS: 31 participants with distressing persecutory delusions and schizophrenia spectrum disorders were randomised to TW or to treatment as usual in a 2:1 ratio. Participants completed outcome assessments at 0 (baseline), 1 (post-MRTP), 6 (post-TW) and 8 (follow-up) weeks. Key outcomes included belief flexibility, paranoia, and delusional conviction and distress. Participants allocated to TW completed the MRTP package and four CBT sessions with a clinical psychologist. RESULTS: Recruitment proved feasible. Participants reported the intervention was relevant and had resulted in positive changes in thinking and mood, which they could use in everyday life. Treatment effects were moderate-large for key outcomes including belief flexibility, paranoia conviction and distress. The additional TW sessions appeared to confer benefits over MRTP alone. LIMITATIONS: Assessments were not carried out blind to treatment condition. Recruitment was opportunistic, from an identified pool of research participants. Finally, a few participants had already completed the MRTP as part of a previous study. CONCLUSIONS: The TW intervention appears to be feasible and acceptable to participants, and the effects of treatment are promising. A fully powered randomised controlled trial of the intervention is warranted. Elsevier 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4429971/ /pubmed/25770671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.007 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Waller, Helen
Emsley, Richard
Freeman, Daniel
Bebbington, Paul
Dunn, Graham
Fowler, David
Hardy, Amy
Kuipers, Elizabeth
Garety, Philippa
Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs
title Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs
title_full Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs
title_fullStr Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs
title_full_unstemmed Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs
title_short Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs
title_sort thinking well: a randomised controlled feasibility study of a new cbt therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25770671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT wallerhelen thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT emsleyrichard thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT freemandaniel thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT bebbingtonpaul thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT dunngraham thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT fowlerdavid thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT hardyamy thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT kuiperselizabeth thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs
AT garetyphilippa thinkingwellarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudyofanewcbttherapytargetingreasoningbiasesinpeoplewithdistressingpersecutorydelusionalbeliefs