Cargando…

Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study

OBJECTIVE: Discectomy as a treatment for herniated lumbar discs results in outcomes after surgery that are not uniformly positive. Surgeons face the dilemma between limited nucleus removal which is associated with a higher risk of recurrence, or more aggressive nucleus removal which may lead to disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lequin, Michiel B., Barth, Martin, Thomė, Claudius, Bouma, Gerrit J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4430560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983843
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2012.9.4.340
_version_ 1782371196533211136
author Lequin, Michiel B.
Barth, Martin
Thomė, Claudius
Bouma, Gerrit J.
author_facet Lequin, Michiel B.
Barth, Martin
Thomė, Claudius
Bouma, Gerrit J.
author_sort Lequin, Michiel B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Discectomy as a treatment for herniated lumbar discs results in outcomes after surgery that are not uniformly positive. Surgeons face the dilemma between limited nucleus removal which is associated with a higher risk of recurrence, or more aggressive nucleus removal which may lead to disc height loss and persistent back-pain. annulus closure devices may allow for the benefits of limited nucleus removal without the increased risk of recurrence. This is an interim report of an ongoing 24-month post-marketing study of the Barricaid® annulus closure device, consisting of a flexible polymer mesh that blocks the defect, held in place by a titanium bone anchor. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 45 patients at four hospitals, and implanted the Barricaid® after a limited discectomy. annulus defect size and volume of removed nucleus were recorded. Reherniations were reported, pain and function were monitored and imaging was performed at regular intervals during 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At 12 months postsurgery, pain and function were significantly improved, comparing favorably to reported results from limited discectomy. Disc height has been well maintained. One reherniation has occurred (2.4%), which was associated with a misplaced device. No device fracture, subsidence or migration has been observed. CONCLUSION: The use of an annulus closure device may provide a reduction in reherniation rate for lumbar discectomy patients with large annulus defects who are at the greatest risk of recurrence. Using such a device should provide the surgeon increased confidence in minimizing nucleus removal, which, in turn, may preserve disc height and biomechanics, reducing degeneration and associated poor clinical outcomes in the long-term. A randomized multicenter study evaluating limited discectomy with and without the Barricaid® is currently underway, and will provide a higher level of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4430560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44305602015-05-15 Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study Lequin, Michiel B. Barth, Martin Thomė, Claudius Bouma, Gerrit J. Korean J Spine Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: Discectomy as a treatment for herniated lumbar discs results in outcomes after surgery that are not uniformly positive. Surgeons face the dilemma between limited nucleus removal which is associated with a higher risk of recurrence, or more aggressive nucleus removal which may lead to disc height loss and persistent back-pain. annulus closure devices may allow for the benefits of limited nucleus removal without the increased risk of recurrence. This is an interim report of an ongoing 24-month post-marketing study of the Barricaid® annulus closure device, consisting of a flexible polymer mesh that blocks the defect, held in place by a titanium bone anchor. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 45 patients at four hospitals, and implanted the Barricaid® after a limited discectomy. annulus defect size and volume of removed nucleus were recorded. Reherniations were reported, pain and function were monitored and imaging was performed at regular intervals during 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: At 12 months postsurgery, pain and function were significantly improved, comparing favorably to reported results from limited discectomy. Disc height has been well maintained. One reherniation has occurred (2.4%), which was associated with a misplaced device. No device fracture, subsidence or migration has been observed. CONCLUSION: The use of an annulus closure device may provide a reduction in reherniation rate for lumbar discectomy patients with large annulus defects who are at the greatest risk of recurrence. Using such a device should provide the surgeon increased confidence in minimizing nucleus removal, which, in turn, may preserve disc height and biomechanics, reducing degeneration and associated poor clinical outcomes in the long-term. A randomized multicenter study evaluating limited discectomy with and without the Barricaid® is currently underway, and will provide a higher level of evidence. The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2012-12 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4430560/ /pubmed/25983843 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2012.9.4.340 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Lequin, Michiel B.
Barth, Martin
Thomė, Claudius
Bouma, Gerrit J.
Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study
title Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study
title_full Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study
title_fullStr Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study
title_short Primary Limited Lumbar Discectomy with an Annulus Closure Device: One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study
title_sort primary limited lumbar discectomy with an annulus closure device: one-year clinical and radiographic results from a prospective, multi-center study
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4430560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983843
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2012.9.4.340
work_keys_str_mv AT lequinmichielb primarylimitedlumbardiscectomywithanannulusclosuredeviceoneyearclinicalandradiographicresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT barthmartin primarylimitedlumbardiscectomywithanannulusclosuredeviceoneyearclinicalandradiographicresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT thomeclaudius primarylimitedlumbardiscectomywithanannulusclosuredeviceoneyearclinicalandradiographicresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterstudy
AT boumagerritj primarylimitedlumbardiscectomywithanannulusclosuredeviceoneyearclinicalandradiographicresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterstudy