Cargando…

An excellent result of surgical treatment in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension following mitral valve disease

OBJECTIVE: Observe the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension caused by mitral valve disease. METHODS: We examined the results of surgical treatment in 32 patients with mitral valve disease and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (pulmonary arterial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Xiaochun, Zhang, Cui, Chen, Xin, Chen, Yongming, Shi, Qiankun, Niu, Yongsheng, Xiao, Jilai, Mu, Xinwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25962897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0274-1
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Observe the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension caused by mitral valve disease. METHODS: We examined the results of surgical treatment in 32 patients with mitral valve disease and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure ≥ 80 mmHg) retrospectively. Operative and postoperative data collection included type of the surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross-clamp time and the mortality rate. Pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction were recorded and compared. RESULTS: A total number of 32 patients had the operation of mitral valve replacement. Among those subjects, twenty-seven patients were surgically replaced with mechanical prosthesis and five patients with tissue prosthesis. Only one patient died of pneumonia, with a mortality rate of 3.1 %. The statistical results of preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic data showed significant decrease in pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (101.2 ± 20.3 versus 48.1 ± 14.3 mmHg, P < 0.05), left atrial diameter(67.6 ± 15.7 versus 54.4 ± 11.4 mm, P < 0.05) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (52.3 ± 9.5 versus 49.2 ± 5.9 mm, P < 0.05). There was no significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (59.2 ± 6.5 versus 57.9 ± 7.6, P = NS). At the time of follow-up, twenty-eight (96.6 %) patients were classified in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, one(3.4 %) in class III, with the mortality rate is zero percent. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve replacement can be performed successfully in patients with mitral valve disease and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension with an acceptable perioperative risk.