Cargando…

Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol

INTRODUCTION: People living with and beyond cancer are vulnerable to a number of physical, functional and psychological issues. Undertaking a holistic needs assessment (HNA) is one way to support a structured discussion of patients’ needs within a clinical consultation. However, there is little evid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snowden, Austyn, Young, Jenny, White, Craig, Murray, Esther, Richard, Claude, Lussier, Marie-Therese, MacArthur, Ewan, Storey, Dawn, Schipani, Stefano, Wheatley, Duncan, McMahon, Jeremy, Ross, Elaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25967990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006840
_version_ 1782371285728231424
author Snowden, Austyn
Young, Jenny
White, Craig
Murray, Esther
Richard, Claude
Lussier, Marie-Therese
MacArthur, Ewan
Storey, Dawn
Schipani, Stefano
Wheatley, Duncan
McMahon, Jeremy
Ross, Elaine
author_facet Snowden, Austyn
Young, Jenny
White, Craig
Murray, Esther
Richard, Claude
Lussier, Marie-Therese
MacArthur, Ewan
Storey, Dawn
Schipani, Stefano
Wheatley, Duncan
McMahon, Jeremy
Ross, Elaine
author_sort Snowden, Austyn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: People living with and beyond cancer are vulnerable to a number of physical, functional and psychological issues. Undertaking a holistic needs assessment (HNA) is one way to support a structured discussion of patients’ needs within a clinical consultation. However, there is little evidence on how HNA impacts on the dynamics of the clinical consultation. This study aims to establish (1) how HNA affects the type of conversation that goes on during a clinical consultation and (2) how these putative changes impact on shared decision-making and self-efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is hosted by 10 outpatient oncology clinics in the West of Scotland and South West England. Participants are patients with a diagnosis of head and neck, breast, urological, gynaecological and colorectal cancer who have received treatment for their cancer. Patients are randomised to an intervention or control group. The control group entails standard care—routine consultation between the patient and clinician. In the intervention group, the patient completes a holistic needs assessment prior to consultation. The completed assessment is then given to the clinician where it informs a discussion based on the patient's needs and concerns as identified by them. The primary outcome measure is patient participation, as determined by dialogue ratio (DR) and preponderance of initiative (PI) within the consultation. The secondary outcome measures are shared decision-making and self-efficacy. It is hypothesised that HNA will be associated with greater patient participation within the consultation, and that shared decision-making and feelings of self-efficacy will increase as a function of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been given a favourable opinion by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee and NHS Research & Development. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference attendance. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov NCT02274701.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4431131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44311312015-05-20 Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol Snowden, Austyn Young, Jenny White, Craig Murray, Esther Richard, Claude Lussier, Marie-Therese MacArthur, Ewan Storey, Dawn Schipani, Stefano Wheatley, Duncan McMahon, Jeremy Ross, Elaine BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: People living with and beyond cancer are vulnerable to a number of physical, functional and psychological issues. Undertaking a holistic needs assessment (HNA) is one way to support a structured discussion of patients’ needs within a clinical consultation. However, there is little evidence on how HNA impacts on the dynamics of the clinical consultation. This study aims to establish (1) how HNA affects the type of conversation that goes on during a clinical consultation and (2) how these putative changes impact on shared decision-making and self-efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is hosted by 10 outpatient oncology clinics in the West of Scotland and South West England. Participants are patients with a diagnosis of head and neck, breast, urological, gynaecological and colorectal cancer who have received treatment for their cancer. Patients are randomised to an intervention or control group. The control group entails standard care—routine consultation between the patient and clinician. In the intervention group, the patient completes a holistic needs assessment prior to consultation. The completed assessment is then given to the clinician where it informs a discussion based on the patient's needs and concerns as identified by them. The primary outcome measure is patient participation, as determined by dialogue ratio (DR) and preponderance of initiative (PI) within the consultation. The secondary outcome measures are shared decision-making and self-efficacy. It is hypothesised that HNA will be associated with greater patient participation within the consultation, and that shared decision-making and feelings of self-efficacy will increase as a function of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been given a favourable opinion by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee and NHS Research & Development. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference attendance. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov NCT02274701. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4431131/ /pubmed/25967990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006840 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Snowden, Austyn
Young, Jenny
White, Craig
Murray, Esther
Richard, Claude
Lussier, Marie-Therese
MacArthur, Ewan
Storey, Dawn
Schipani, Stefano
Wheatley, Duncan
McMahon, Jeremy
Ross, Elaine
Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol
title Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol
title_full Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol
title_fullStr Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol
title_short Evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol
title_sort evaluating holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care—a randomised controlled trial: the study protocol
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25967990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006840
work_keys_str_mv AT snowdenaustyn evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT youngjenny evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT whitecraig evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT murrayesther evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT richardclaude evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT lussiermarietherese evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT macarthurewan evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT storeydawn evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT schipanistefano evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT wheatleyduncan evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT mcmahonjeremy evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol
AT rosselaine evaluatingholisticneedsassessmentinoutpatientcancercarearandomisedcontrolledtrialthestudyprotocol