Cargando…
MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16
OBJECTIVES: To identify the first time point of an MRI-verified response to certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty-one patients with active RA despite disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy were randomised 2:1 to CZP (CZP loading dose 400 mg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206359 |
_version_ | 1782371327692242944 |
---|---|
author | Østergaard, M Jacobsson, L T H Schaufelberger, C Hansen, M Sejer Bijlsma, J W J Dudek, A Rell-Bakalarska, M Staelens, F Haake, R Sundman-Engberg, B Bliddal, H |
author_facet | Østergaard, M Jacobsson, L T H Schaufelberger, C Hansen, M Sejer Bijlsma, J W J Dudek, A Rell-Bakalarska, M Staelens, F Haake, R Sundman-Engberg, B Bliddal, H |
author_sort | Østergaard, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To identify the first time point of an MRI-verified response to certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty-one patients with active RA despite disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy were randomised 2:1 to CZP (CZP loading dose 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0–4; CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 6–16) or placebo→CZP (placebo at weeks 0–2; CZP loading dose at weeks 2–6; CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 8–16). Contrast-enhanced MRI of one hand and wrist was acquired at baseline (week 0) and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16. All six time points were read simultaneously, blinded to time, using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials RA MRI scoring system. Primary outcome was change in synovitis score in the CZP group; secondary outcomes were change in bone oedema (osteitis) and erosion scores and clinical outcome measures. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated (27 CZP, 13 placebo→CZP), and 36 (24 CZP, 12 placebo→CZP) completed week 16. In the CZP group, there were significant reductions from baseline synovitis (Hodges–Lehmann estimate of median change, −1.5, p=0.049) and osteitis scores (−2.5, p=0.031) at week 16. Numerical, but statistically insignificant, MRI inflammation reductions were observed at weeks 1–2 in the CZP group. No significant change was seen in bone erosion score. Improvements across all clinical outcomes were seen in the CZP group. CONCLUSIONS: CZP reduced MRI synovitis and osteitis scores at week 16, despite small sample size and the technical challenge of reading six time points simultaneously. This study provides essential information on optimal MRI timing for subsequent trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01235598. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4431335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44313352015-05-15 MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 Østergaard, M Jacobsson, L T H Schaufelberger, C Hansen, M Sejer Bijlsma, J W J Dudek, A Rell-Bakalarska, M Staelens, F Haake, R Sundman-Engberg, B Bliddal, H Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: To identify the first time point of an MRI-verified response to certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty-one patients with active RA despite disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy were randomised 2:1 to CZP (CZP loading dose 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0–4; CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 6–16) or placebo→CZP (placebo at weeks 0–2; CZP loading dose at weeks 2–6; CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 8–16). Contrast-enhanced MRI of one hand and wrist was acquired at baseline (week 0) and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16. All six time points were read simultaneously, blinded to time, using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials RA MRI scoring system. Primary outcome was change in synovitis score in the CZP group; secondary outcomes were change in bone oedema (osteitis) and erosion scores and clinical outcome measures. RESULTS: Forty patients were treated (27 CZP, 13 placebo→CZP), and 36 (24 CZP, 12 placebo→CZP) completed week 16. In the CZP group, there were significant reductions from baseline synovitis (Hodges–Lehmann estimate of median change, −1.5, p=0.049) and osteitis scores (−2.5, p=0.031) at week 16. Numerical, but statistically insignificant, MRI inflammation reductions were observed at weeks 1–2 in the CZP group. No significant change was seen in bone erosion score. Improvements across all clinical outcomes were seen in the CZP group. CONCLUSIONS: CZP reduced MRI synovitis and osteitis scores at week 16, despite small sample size and the technical challenge of reading six time points simultaneously. This study provides essential information on optimal MRI timing for subsequent trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01235598. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06 2014-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4431335/ /pubmed/25512675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206359 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Epidemiological Research Østergaard, M Jacobsson, L T H Schaufelberger, C Hansen, M Sejer Bijlsma, J W J Dudek, A Rell-Bakalarska, M Staelens, F Haake, R Sundman-Engberg, B Bliddal, H MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 |
title | MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 |
title_full | MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 |
title_fullStr | MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 |
title_short | MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 |
title_sort | mri assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase iiib study applying mri at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 |
topic | Clinical and Epidemiological Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT østergaardm mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT jacobssonlth mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT schaufelbergerc mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT hansenmsejer mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT bijlsmajwj mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT dudeka mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT rellbakalarskam mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT staelensf mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT haaker mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT sundmanengbergb mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 AT bliddalh mriassessmentofearlyresponsetocertolizumabpegolinrheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphaseiiibstudyapplyingmriatweeks01248and16 |