Cargando…

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact

Antimicrobial stewardship is a new field that struggles to find the right balance between meaningful and useful metrics to study the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). ASP metrics primarily measure antimicrobial use, although microbiological resistance and clinical outcomes are als...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Morris, Andrew M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-014-0015-3
_version_ 1782371390656086016
author Morris, Andrew M.
author_facet Morris, Andrew M.
author_sort Morris, Andrew M.
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial stewardship is a new field that struggles to find the right balance between meaningful and useful metrics to study the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). ASP metrics primarily measure antimicrobial use, although microbiological resistance and clinical outcomes are also important measures of the impact an ASP has on a hospital and its patient population. Antimicrobial measures looking at consumption are the most commonly used measures, and are focused on defined daily doses, days of therapy, and costs, usually standardized per 1,000 patient-days. Each measure provides slightly different information, with their own upsides and downfalls. Point prevalence measurement of antimicrobial use is an increasingly used approach to understanding consumption that does not entirely rely on sophisticated electronic information systems, and is also replicable. Appropriateness measures hold appeal and promise, but have not been developed to the degree that makes them useful and widely applicable. The primary reason why antimicrobial stewardship is necessary is the growth of antimicrobial resistance. Accordingly, antimicrobial resistance is an important metric of the impact of an ASP. The most common approach to measuring resistance for ASP purposes is to report rates of common or important community- or nosocomial-acquired antimicrobial-resistant organisms, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile. Such an approach is dependent on detection methods, community rates of resistance, and co-interventions, and therefore may not be the most accurate or reflective measure of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Development of an index to reflect the net burden of resistance holds theoretical promise, but has yet to be realized. Finally, programs must consider patient outcome measures. Mortality is the most objective and reliable method, but has several drawbacks. Disease- or organism-specific mortality, or cure, are increasingly used metrics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4431704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44317042015-05-19 Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact Morris, Andrew M. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis Antimicrobial Stewardship (A Pakyz, Section Editor) Antimicrobial stewardship is a new field that struggles to find the right balance between meaningful and useful metrics to study the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). ASP metrics primarily measure antimicrobial use, although microbiological resistance and clinical outcomes are also important measures of the impact an ASP has on a hospital and its patient population. Antimicrobial measures looking at consumption are the most commonly used measures, and are focused on defined daily doses, days of therapy, and costs, usually standardized per 1,000 patient-days. Each measure provides slightly different information, with their own upsides and downfalls. Point prevalence measurement of antimicrobial use is an increasingly used approach to understanding consumption that does not entirely rely on sophisticated electronic information systems, and is also replicable. Appropriateness measures hold appeal and promise, but have not been developed to the degree that makes them useful and widely applicable. The primary reason why antimicrobial stewardship is necessary is the growth of antimicrobial resistance. Accordingly, antimicrobial resistance is an important metric of the impact of an ASP. The most common approach to measuring resistance for ASP purposes is to report rates of common or important community- or nosocomial-acquired antimicrobial-resistant organisms, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile. Such an approach is dependent on detection methods, community rates of resistance, and co-interventions, and therefore may not be the most accurate or reflective measure of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Development of an index to reflect the net burden of resistance holds theoretical promise, but has yet to be realized. Finally, programs must consider patient outcome measures. Mortality is the most objective and reliable method, but has several drawbacks. Disease- or organism-specific mortality, or cure, are increasingly used metrics. Springer US 2014-04-26 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4431704/ /pubmed/25999798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-014-0015-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Antimicrobial Stewardship (A Pakyz, Section Editor)
Morris, Andrew M.
Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact
title Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact
title_full Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact
title_short Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact
title_sort antimicrobial stewardship programs: appropriate measures and metrics to study their impact
topic Antimicrobial Stewardship (A Pakyz, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40506-014-0015-3
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisandrewm antimicrobialstewardshipprogramsappropriatemeasuresandmetricstostudytheirimpact